Skip to main content
Log in

The development of chromosome-specific composite DNA probes for the mouse and their application to chromosome painting

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The speed and ease of human cytogenetic analysis has been greatly enhanced by the technique of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Non-radioactive fluorescently tagged complex DNA probes specific for individual chromosomes can be hybridized to conventionally obtained metaphase chromosome spreads. Several chromosomes may be “painted” concurrently by using combinations of different labeled probes. Surveys of chromosome breakage and rearrangement may be performed very quickly by avoiding the time consuming process of GTG-banding. The application of FISH to mouse cytogenetics would allow large scale molecular toxicology studies to be conducted on the effects of such environmental insults as potential carcinogens, mutagens and radiation. Progress has been hampered, however, as the Mus musculus karyotype consists of 40 acrocentric chromosomes of approximately the same size, making the recognition and separation of individual chromosomes very difficult. We now describe the successful production and application of chromosome-specific composite DNA probes for M. musculus chromosomes 2 and 8. Stable Robertsonian translocated chromosomes were isolated on a flow sorter and their DNA subsequently amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide primer (DOP) PCR. Small pools (300 copies) of each chromosome were denatured at 94° C then annealed with the primer at 30°C for 15 cycles. This was followed by 20 cycles at an annealing temperature of 62° C. Additional amplification was performed at an annealing temperature of 62° C. The chromosome-specific DNA was labeled with biotin 11-dUTP by nick translation and used for FISH. The usefulness of the technique for translocation detection is demonstrated by analyzing chromosome exchanges induced in mice irradiated with 137Cs γ rays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Awa AA, Sofuni T, Honda T, Itoh M, Neriishi S, Otake M (1978) Relationship between the radiation dose and chromosome aberrations in atomic bomb survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. J Radiat Res 19:126–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahary N, Pachter JE, Felman R, Leibel RL, Albright K, Cram S, Friedman JM (1992) Molecular mapping of mouse chromosomes 4 and 8: use of a flow-sorted Robertsonian chromosome. Genomics 13:761–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle AL, Ward DC (1992) Isolation and initial characterization of a large repeat sequence element specific to mouse chromosome 8. Genomics 12:517–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Broccoli D, Trevor KT, Miller OJ, Miller DA (1991) Isolation of a variant family of mouse minor satellite DNA that hybridizes preferentially to chromosome 4. Genomics 10:68–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Backton KE (1976) Identification with G and R banding of the position of breakage points induced in human chromosomes by in vitro X irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 29:475–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrano AV (1973a) Chromosome aberrations and radiation-induced cell death. I. Transmission and survival parameters of aberrations. Mutat Res 17:341–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrano AV (1973b) Chromosome aberrations and radiation-induced cell death. II. Predicted and observed cell survival. Mutat Res 17:355–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell JK (1984) A photographic representation of the variability in the G-banded structure of the chromosomes in the mouse karyotype. A guide to the identification of the individual chromosomes. Chromosoma 89:294–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Disteche CM, Carrano AV, Ashworth LK, Burkhart-Schultz K, Latt SA (1981) Flow sorting of the mouse Cattanach X chromosome, T (X;7) 1 Ct, in an active or inactive state. Cytogenet Cell Genet 29:189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon SC, Miller NG, Carter NP, Tucker EM (1992) Bivariate flow cytometry of farm animal chromosomes: a potential tool for gene mapping. Anim Genet 23:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans HJ (1962) Chromosome aberrations induced by ionizing radiation. Int Rev Cytol 13:221–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher EM, Cavanna JS, Brown SD (1985) Microdissection and microcloning of the mouse X chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:5846–5849

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray J (1989) Flow cytogenetics. Academic Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (1990) Molecular cloning of DNA from specific chromosomal regions by microdissection and sequence-independent amplification of DNA. Genomics 6:243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford CF, Telenius H, Carter NP, Miller NGA, Tucker EM (1992) Chromosome painting using chromosome-specific probes from flow sorted pig chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 61:221–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter P, Cremer T, Borden J, Manuelidis L, Ward DC (1988a) Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries. Hum Genet 80:224–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter P, Cremer T, Tang CJ, Watkins PC, Manuelidis L, Ward DC (1988b) Rapid detection of human chromosome 21 aberrations by in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:9664–9668

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JN, Tenjin T, Straume T, Pinkel D, Moore D 2d, Litt M, Gray JW (1989) Rapid human chromosome aberration analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Int J Radiat Biol 56:35–44. Published erratum appears in Int J Radiat Biol (1989) 56:201

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JN, Awa A, Straume T, Poggensee M, Kodama Y, Nakano M, Ohtaki K, Weier HU, Pinkel D, Gray J, Littlefield (1992) Rapid translocation frequency analysis in humans decades after exposure to ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 62:53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Milan D, Yerle M, Schmitz A, Chaput B, Vaiman M, Frelat G, Gellin J (1993) A PCR-based method to amplify DNA with random primers: determining the chromosomal content of porcine flow-karyotype peaks by chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet 62:139–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DA, Sharma V, Mitchell AR (1988) A human-derived probe, p82H, hybridizes to the centromeres of gorilla, chimpanzee, and orangutan. Chromosoma 96:270–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Dixon SC, Miller NG, Tucker EM, Hindkjaer J, Thomsen PD (1992) A chromosome 1-specific DNA library from the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domestica). Cytogenet Cell Genet 61:128–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan AT, Vyas RC, Darroudi F, Vermeulen S (1992) Frequencies of X-ray-induced chromosome translocations in human peripheral lymphocytes as detected by in situ hybridization using chromosome-specific DNA libraries. Int J Radiat Biol 61:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohtaki K, Shimba H, Awa AA, Sofuni T (1982) Comparison of type and frequency of chromosome aberrations by conventional and G-staining methods in Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors. J Radiat Res 23:441–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkel D, Landegent J, Collins C, Fuscoe J, Seagraves R, Lucas J, Gray J (1988) Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:9138–9142

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford IR, Hodgson GS, Matthews JP (1988) Critical DNA target size modeling of ionizing radiation-induced mammalian cell death. Int J Radiat Biol 54:63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho AT, Nascimento ACH, Natarajan AT (1988) Dose assessments by cytogenetic analysis in the Goiana (Brazil) radiation accident. Radiat Prev Dosim 25:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Ried T, Baldini A, Rand TC, Ward DC (1992a) Simultaneous visualization of seven different DNA probes by in situ hybridization using combinatorial fluorescence and digital imaging microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1388–1392

    Google Scholar 

  • Ried T, Landes G, Dackowski W, Klinger K, Ward DC (1992b) Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization for the simultaneous detection of probe sets for chromosomes 13, 18, 21 X and Y in uncultured amniotic fluid cells. Hum Mol Genet 1:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillar R, Young BD (1981) A new method for the preparation of metaphase chromosomes for flow analysis. J Histochem 29:74–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Straume T, Langlois RG, Lucas J, Jensen RH, Bigbee WL, Ramalho AT, Brandao-Mello CE (1991) Novel methods applied to victims of the Goiana accident. Health Phys 60:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Straume T, Lucas JN, Tucker JD, Bigbee WL, Langlois RG (1992) Biodosimetry for a radiation worker using multiple assays. Health Phys 62:122–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Carter NP, Bebb CE, Nordenskjold M, Ponder BA, Tunnacliffe A (1992) Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics 13:718–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Trask BJ (1991) Fluorescence in situ hybridization: applications in cytogenetics and gene mapping. Trends Genet 7:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker JD, Christensen ML, Strout CL, Carrano AV (1986) Determination of the baseline sister chromatid exchange frequency in human and mouse peripheral lymphocytes using monoclonal antibodies and very low doses of bromodeoxyuridine. Cytogenet Cell Genet 43:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker JD, Ramsey MJ, Lee DA, Mi nkler J (1993) Validation of chromsome painting as a biodosimeter in human peripheral lymphocytes following acute exposure to ionizing radiation in vitro. Int J Radiat Biol 64CD:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Vissel B, Choo KH (1989) Mouse major (gamma) satellite DNA is highly conserved and organized into extremely long tandem arrays: implications for recombination between nonhomologous chromosomes. Genomics 5:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Weier HUG, Lucas JN, Poggensee M, Seagraves R, Pinkel D, Gray JW (1991) Two-color hybridization with high complexity chromosome-specific probes and degenerate alpha satellite probe DNA allows unambiguous discrimination between symmetrical and asymmetrical translocations. Chromosoma 100:371–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner JE, Endo TR, Gill BS (1992) Toward a cytogenetically based physical map of the wheat genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11307–11311

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerle M, Schmitz A, Milan D, Chaput B, Monteagudo L, Vaiman M, Frelat G, Gellin J (1993) Accurate characterization of porcine bivariate flow karyotype by PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics 16:97–103

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by: D. Schweizer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breneman, J.W., Ramsey, M.J., Lee, D.A. et al. The development of chromosome-specific composite DNA probes for the mouse and their application to chromosome painting. Chromosoma 102, 591–598 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352306

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352306

Keywords

Navigation