Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of orientation at behavior of univalent in living grasshopper spermatocytes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Orientational movements and modes of segregation at anaphase I were analyzed in three different types of univalents in living spermatocytes of the grasshopper species Eyprepocnemis plorans, namely the sex univalent, three types of accessory chromosomes and spontaneous and induced autosomal univalents. When two or more univalents were present in the same spindle, their dynamics were directly compared. Chromosomes may show variable velocity and number of reorientations: the X and the most common B types (B1 and B2) are slow and rarely reorient, a more geographically restricted B (B5) is faster and reorients more often, and autosomal univalents are the fastest and show the highest frequency of reorientations. Nonetheless, the X and the accessories are rigorously reductional at anaphase I whereas autosomal univalents often fail to migrate or divide equationally. This indicates that orientational and segregational behavior are controlled mainly by chromosomal rather than cellular characteristics and that chromosomes may display a great variety of strategies to achieve regular segregation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arana P, Nicklas RB (1992) Orientation and segregation of a micromanipulated multivalent: Familiar principles: divergent outcomes. Chromosoma 101: 399–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Ault JG (1984) Unipolar orientation stability of the sex univalent in the grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes. Chromosoma 89: 201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Ault JG (1986) Stable versus unstable orientations of sex chromosomes in two grasshopper species. Chromosoma 93: 298–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer H, Dietz R, Röbbelen C (1961) Die Spermatocytenteilungen der Tipuliden. III. Das Bewegungsverhalten der Chromosomen in Translokationheterozygoten von Tipula oleracea. Chromosoma 12: 116–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Church K, Lin H-PP (1985) Kinetocore microtubules and chromosome movement during prometaphase in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocytes studies in life and with the electron microscope. Chromosoma 92: 273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz R (1956) Die Spermatocytenteilungen der Tipuliden. II. Graphische Analyse der Chromosomenbewegung während der Prometaphase I im Leben. Chromosoma 8: 183–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein LSB (1981) Kinetochore structure and its role in chromosome orientation during the first meiotic division in male D. melanogaster. Cell 25: 591–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson SA (1963) Temperature and chiasma formation in Schistocerca gregaria. I. An analysis of the response at a constant 40°C. Heredity 18: 77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques-Gil N, Arana P (1990) Origin and substitution of B-chromosomes in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Evolution 44: 747–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques-Gil N, Santos JL, Giráldez R (1982) B-chromosome polymorphism and interchromosomal chiasma interference in Eyprepocnemis plorans (Acrididae, Orthoptera). Chromosoma 85:349–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques-Gil N, Arana P, Santos JL (1984a) Factors affecting the meiotic pairing behaviour of B chromosomes in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans (Acrididae, Orthoptera). Can J Genet Cytol 26:664–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques-Gil N, Santos JL, Arana P (1984b) Evolution of a complex B-chromosome polymorphism in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Chromosoma 89:290–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Janicke MA, LaFountain JR (1989) Centomeric dots in crane-fly spermatocytes: Meiotic maturation and malorientation. Chromosoma 98:358–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GH, Croft JA (1986) Surface spreading of synaptonemal complexes in locusts. II. Zygotene pairing behaviour. Chromosoma 93:489–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Loidl J (1989) Effects of elevated temperature on meiotic chromosome synapsis in Allium ursinum. Chromosoma 97:449–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-León MD, Cabrero J, Camacho JPM, Cano MI, Santos JL (1992) A widespread chromosome polymorphism maintained without apparent drive. Evolution 46:529–539

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh JR, Pfarr CM (1991) Mitotic motors. J Cell Biol 115: 577–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki WY, Orr-Weaver TL (1994) Sister-chromatid cohesion in mitosis and meiosis. Annu Rev Genet 28:167–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas RB (1961) Recurrent pole-to-pole movements of the sex chromosome during prometaphase I in Melanoplus differentialis spermatocytes. Chromosoma 12:97–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas RB (1967) Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientiation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. Chromosoma 21:17–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas RB, Kubai DF, Hays TS (1982) Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase. J Cell Biol 95:91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Östergren G (1951) The mechanism of co-orientiation in bivalents and multivalents. Hereditas 37:85–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Östergren G, Mole-Bajer J, Bajer A (1960) An interpretation of transport phenomena at mitosis. Ann NY Acad Sci 90: 381–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock WJ (1968) Replication, recombination, and chiasma in Goniaea australasiae (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Genetics 65: 593–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieder CL (1991) Mitosis: towards a molecular and understanding of chromosome behavior. Curr Opin Cell Biol 3:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Rufas JS, Mazzella C, Suja JA, Garcia de la Vega C (1989) Kinetochore structures are duplicated prior to the first meiotic metaphase. A model of meiotic behavior of kinetochores in grasshoppers. Eur J Cell Biol 48:220–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Rufas JS, Mazzella C, Garcia de la Vega C, Suja JA (1994) Ultrastructure detection of kinetochores by silver impregnation. Chromosome Res 2:369–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos JL, Cerro AL del, Díez M (1993) Spreading synaptonemal complexes from the grasshopper Chorthippus jacobsi: pachytene and zygotene observations. Hereditas 118:235–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon G, Simchen G (1990) Centromeric regions control autonomous segregation tendencies in single-division meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 125:487–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Simchen G, Hugerat Y (1993) What determines whether chromosomes segregate reductionally or equationally in meiosis? Bioessays 15:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibbens RV, Skeen VP, Salmon ED (1993) Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: A push-pull mechanism. J Cell Biol 122:859–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Vig BK, Paweletz N (1988) Kinetochores, centromeres, spindles and the induction of aneuploidy. Mutat Res 201:259–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar EB, Bray DF (1973) The ultrastructure of kinetochores of unpaired chromosomes in a wheat hybrid. Can J Genet Cytol 15:801–806

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf KW (1994) How meiotic cells deal with non-exchange chromosomes. Bioessays 16:107–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rebollo, E., Arana, P. A comparative study of orientation at behavior of univalent in living grasshopper spermatocytes. Chromosoma 104, 56–67 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352226

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352226

Keywords

Navigation