Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of microbiological methods for evaluating quality and fertility of soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Routine soil testing procedures that are rapid and accurate are needed to evaluate C and N mineralization in agricultural soils in order to determine soil quality and fertility. Laboratory methods were compared for their usefulness in determining soil microbial biomass and potential activity in a Weswood silty clay loam (fine, mixed, thermic Fluventic Ustochrept) subjected to long-term tillage, crop sequence, and N-fertilizer management practices. The methods included basal soil respiration, net N mineralization during a 10-day incubation, soil microbial biomass C with the chloroform fumigation-incubation technique with and without subtracting a control value, soil microbial biomass N with the chloroform fumigation-incubation technique, substrate-induced respiration, and arginine ammonification. All methods were highly correlated with each other and, therefore, appear to adequately reflect soil microbial biomass and potential activity under laboratory conditions. The longer incubation times used with the basal soil respiration, N mineralization, and microbial biomass C and N assays resulted in higher correlations and lower variation among replications compared to the shorter incubation times used with substrate-induced respiration and arginine ammonification. The relatively rapid procedural time (3 h) required for the latter two assays could make these methods more attractive for routine soil testing, although multiple assays on the same sample may be necessary because these methods are less precise than the incubation methods that require 10 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alef K, Beck T, Zelles L, Kleiner D (1988) A comparison of methods to estimate microbial biomass and N-mineralization in agricultural and grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 20:561–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Alef K, Kleiner D (1986) Arginine ammonification, a simple method to estimate microbial activity potentials in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 18:233–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE (1982) Soil respiration. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, 2nd edn. Agron Monogr 9, Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wis, pp 837–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T-H, Domsch KH (1989) Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 21:471–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Beare MH, Neely CL, Coleman DC, Hargrove WL (1991) Characterization of a substrate-induced respiration method for measuring fungal, bacterial and total microbial biomass on plant residues. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS (1988) The determination of microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in soil. In: Wilson JR (ed) Advances in nitrogen cycling in agricultural ecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 368–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN (1981) Microbial biomass in soil: Measurement and turnover. Soil Biochem 5:415–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. V. A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 8:209–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser E-A, Mueller T, Joergensen RG, Insam H, Heinemeyer O (1992) Evaluation of methods to estimate the soil microbial biomass and their relationship with soil texture and organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 24:675–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens R (1985) Limitations in the application of the fumigation technique for biomass estimations in amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 17:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens R (1987) Estimation of microbial biomass in soil by the respiration method: Importance of soil pH and flushing methods for the measurement of respired CO2. Soil Biol Biochem 19:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Grego S, Ceccanti B (1990) Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. Soil Biochem 6:293–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson D, Coleman DC (1991) Microbial communities, activity and biomass. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:3–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlson DS, Brookes PC, Christensen BT (1987) Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total soil organic matter due to straw incorporation. Soil Biol Biochem 19:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell EJ (1905) Oxidation of soils and its connection with fertility. J Agric Sci 1:261–279

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1985) SAS user's guide: Statistics, version 5. Cary, NC

  • Smith JL, Paul EA (1990) The significance of soil microbial biomass estimations. Soil Biochem 6:357–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL, McNeal BL, Cheng HH (1985) Estimation of soil microbial biomass: An analysis of the respiratory response of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 17:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford G (1982) Assessment of soil nitrogen availability. In: Stevenson FJ (ed) Nitrogen in agricultural soils, Agron Monogr 22, Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wis, pp 651–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Technicon Industrial Systems (1977) Determination of nitrogen in BS digests. Technicon industrial method 334–74 W/B. Technicon Industrial Systems, Tarrytown, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser S, Parkinson D (1992) Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality: Soil microorganisms. Am J Alternative Agric 7:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Voroney RP, Paul EA (1984) Determination of k c and k N in situ for calibration of the chloroform fumigation-incubation method. Soil Biol Biochem 16:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Waksman SA, Starkey RL (1924) Microbiological analysis of soil as an index of soil fertility. VII: Carbon dioxide evolution. Soil Sci 17:141–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Parkinson D (1991) A statistical evaluation of equations for predicting total microbial biomass carbon using physiological and biochemical methods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:75–86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franzluebbers, A.J., Zuberer, D.A. & Hons, F.M. Comparison of microbiological methods for evaluating quality and fertility of soil. Biol Fertil Soils 19, 135–140 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336149

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336149

Key words

Navigation