Skip to main content
Log in

An overview on the standardization of chromatographic methods for screening analysis in toxicology by means of retention indices and secondary standards

I. Gas chromatography

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In systematic toxicological analysis, in which a logical analytical search for a potentially harmful substance has to be carried out, chromatographic methods are of utmost importance since the retention parameter can be used for primary identification. In gas chromatography the Kováts retention index (RI) system is generally accepted for standardization of the retention. In order to increase the reproducibility of the interlaboratory RI, secondary standards for RI calculation have proven to be very useful. The best secondary standards are those that are structurally resembling the substances under investigation. For example, for general toxicological screening analysis, mixtures of drugs are recommended. Stationary phases consisting of Carbowax are most extensively used for solvents and volatile compounds; for less volatile compounds SE-30/OV-1/dimethylsilicone stationary phases have proven to be useful. For these types of stationary phases extensive data compilations comprising over 6000 substances are available for use in toxicology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schepers P, Franke JP, De Zeeuw RA (1983) J Anal Toxicol 7:272–278

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kováts E (1958) Helv Chim Acta 41:1915–1932

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blomberg LG (1987) In: Giddings JC, Grushka E, Brown PR (eds) Advances in chromatography, vol 26. Dekker, New York, pp 229–276

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guardino X, Albaiges J, Firpo G, Rodrigues-Vinals R, Gassiot M (1976) J Chromatogr 118:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van den Dool H, Kratz PD (1963) J Chromatogr 11:463–471

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donike M, Stratmann D (1976) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 279:129–131

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peel HW, Perrigo BJ (1976) Can Soc Forens Sci J 9:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ardrey RE, De Zeeuw RA, Finkle BS, Franke JP, Moffat AC, Möller MR, Müller RK (1985) Gas-chromatographic retention indices of toxicologically relevant substances on SE-30 or OV-1. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franke JP, De Zeeuw RA, Wijsbeek J (1987) In: Brandenberger H, Brandenberger R (eds) Reports on forensic toxicology. Proceedings of the 22nd meeting of TIAFT, pp 109–115

  10. Berninger H, Möller MR (1977) Arch Toxicol 37:295–305

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franke JP, Wijsbeek J, De Zeeuw RA (1990) J Forens Sci 35:813–820

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bogusz M, Wijsbeek J, Franke JP, De Zeeuw RA (1983) J High Resol Chromatogr Chromatogr Commun 6:40–42

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bogusz M, Wijsbeek J, Franke JP, De Zeeuw RA (1983) J Anal Toxicol 7:188–192

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bogusz M, Wijsbeek J, Franke JP, De Zeeuw RA, Gierz J (1985) J Anal Toxicol 9:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yin HF, Zhu Y, Sun YL (1989) Chromatographia 28:502–504

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pacholec F, Poole CF (1984) J Chromatogr 302:289–301

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ballschmiter K, Zell M (1980) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 302:20–31

    Google Scholar 

  18. Donike M (1981) Personal Communication

  19. Watts VW, Simonick TF (1987) J Anal Toxicol 11:210–214

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aderjan R, Bogusz M (1988) J Chromatogr 454:345–351

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rasanen I, Ojanperä I, Vuori E, Hase TA (1992) Proceedings 30th TIAFT Meeting, Fukuoka, Japan (in press)

  22. Vassilaros DL, Kong RC, Later DW, Lee ML (1982) J Chromatogr 252:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  23. Raymer J, Wiesler D, Novotny M (1985) J Chromatogr 325:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  24. Christ DW, Noomano P, Rosas M, Rhone D (1988) J Anal Toxicol 12:84–88

    Google Scholar 

  25. Franke JP, De Zeeuw RA, Wijsbeek J (1988) TIAFT Proceedings of the 25th International Meeting. Groningen, pp 348–355

  26. Moffat AC, Stead AH, Smalldon KW (1974) J Chromatogr 90:19–33

    Google Scholar 

  27. Franke JP, Kuijpers EAP, Machbert G, De Zeeuw RA (1992) In: McLinden V (ed) Proceedings of the 27th International Meeting of TIAFT, Perth, pp 63–70

  28. Parker KD, Fontan CR, Yee JL, Kirk PL (1962) Anal Chem 34:1234–1236

    Google Scholar 

  29. Anthony RM, Suthelmer CA, Sunshine I (1980) J Anal Toxicol 4:43–45

    Google Scholar 

  30. Felby S, Nielsen E (1981) Blutalkohol 18:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  31. Göbel KJ (1982) J Chromatogr 235:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ramsey JD, Flanagan RJ (1982) J Chromatogr 240:423–444

    Google Scholar 

  33. Christmore DS, Kelly RC, Doshier LA (1984) J Forens Sci 29:1038–1044

    Google Scholar 

  34. Penton Z (1985) Clin Chem 31:439–441

    Google Scholar 

  35. Franke JP, Wijsbeek J, De Zeeuw RA, Möller MR, Niermeyer H (1988) J Anal Toxicol 12:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pfleger K, Maurer HH, Weber A (1985) Mass spectral and GC data of drugs, poisons and their metabolites. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mills III T, Roberson JC (1987) Instrumental data for drug analysis. Elsevier, New York, Amsterdam, London

    Google Scholar 

  38. Japp M, Gill R, Osselton MD, Cordonnier J (1986) In: Heyndrickx B (ed) Proceedings of the 23rd European International Meeting of TIAFT, Ghent, pp 172–190

  39. De Zeeuw RA, Franke JP, Geldmacher-von Mallinckrodt M, Machata G, Möller MR, Müller RK, Gräfe A, Tiess D (1992) Gas chromatographic retention indices of solvents and volatile substances for use in toxicological analysis. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tiess D (1984) Wiss Z Wilhelm-Pieck Univ Rostock 33:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  41. Streete PJ, Ruprah M, Ramsey JD, Flanagan RJ (1992) Analyst 117:1111–1127

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huizer H (1991) In: Gough TA (ed) The analysis of drugs of abuse. Wiley, Chichester, pp 23–92

    Google Scholar 

  43. Japp M, Gill R, Osselton MD (1987) J Forens Sci 32:1574–1586

    Google Scholar 

  44. De Zeeuw RA, Franke JP, Maurer HH, Pfleger K (1992) Gas chromatographic retention indices of toxicologically relevant substances on packed or capillary columns with dimethylsilicone stationary phases. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  45. Daldrup T, Susanto F, Michalke P (1981) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 308:413–427

    Google Scholar 

  46. Post D (1983) Schnelle gas-chromatographische Arzneimittelerkennung. Hüthig, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  47. Perrigo BJ, Peel HW (1981) J Chromatogr Sci 19:219–226

    Google Scholar 

  48. Manca D, Ferron L, Weber J-P (1989) Clin Chem 35:601–607

    Google Scholar 

  49. Moffat AC (1986) Clarke's isolation and identification of drugs. Pharmaceutical Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  50. Perrigo BJ, Peel HW, Ballantyne DJ (1985) J Chromatogr 341:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  51. Franke JP, Hegge HJG, De Zeeuw RA (1992) Merck toxicology screening system. Merck, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franke, J.P., Bogusz, M. & de Zeeuw, R.A. An overview on the standardization of chromatographic methods for screening analysis in toxicology by means of retention indices and secondary standards. Fresenius J Anal Chem 347, 67–72 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322833

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322833

Keywords

Navigation