Skip to main content
Log in

The relation between above- and belowground biomass allocation patterns and competitive ability

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a 2-year experiment, the evergreen shrubsErica tetralix andCalluna vulgaris (dominant on nutrient-poor heathland soils) and the perennial deciduous grassMolinia caerulea (dominant on nutrient-rich heathland soils) were grown in replacement series in a factorial combination of four competition types (no competition, only aboveground competition, only belowground competition, full competition) and two levels of nutrient supply (no nutrients and 10 g N+2 g P+10 g K m−2 yr−1). Both in the unfertilized and in the fertilized treatmentsMolinia allocated about twice as much biomass to its root system than didErica andCalluna. In all three species the relative amount of biomass allocated to the roots was lower at high than at low nutrient supply. The relative decrease was larger forMolinia than forErica andCalluna. In the fertilized monocultures biomass of all three species exceeded that in the unfertilized series.Molinia showed the greatest biomass increase. In the unfertilized series no effects of interspecific competition on the biomass of each species were observed in either of the competition treatments. In the fertilized mixtures where only belowground competition was possibleMolinia increased its biomass at the expense of bothErica andCalluna. When only aboveground competition was possible no effects of interspecific competition on the biomass of the competing species were observed. However, in contrast with the evergreens,Molinia responded by positioning its leaf layers relatively higher in the canopy. The effects of full competition were similar to those of only belowground competition, so in the fertilized series belowground competition determined the outcome of competition. The high competitive ability ofMolinia at high nutrient supply can be attributed to the combination of (1) a high potential productivity, (2) a high percentage biomass allocation to the roots, (3) an extensive root system exploiting a large soil volume, and (4) plasticity in the spatial arrangement of leaf layers over its tall canopy. In the species under study the allocation patterns entailed no apparent trade-off between the abilities to compete for above- and belowground resources. This study suggests that this trade-off can be overcome by: (1) plasticity in the spatial arrangement of leaf layers and roots, and (2) compensatory phenotypic and species-specific differences in specific leaf area and specific root length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts R (1990) Nutrient use efficiency in evergreen and deciduous species from heathlands. Oecologia 84:391–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R, Berendse F, Klerk NM, Bakker C (1989) Root production and root turnover in two dominant species of wet heathlands. Oecologia 81:374–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R, Berendse F, De Caluwe H, Schmitz M (1990) Competition in heathland along an experimental gradient of nutrient availability. Oikos 57:310–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Baan Hofman T, Ennik GC (1980) Investigation into plant characters affecting the competitive ability of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Neth J Agric Sci 28:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Baan Hofman T, Ennik GC (1982) The effect of root mass of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) on the competitive ability with respect to couchgrass (Elytrigia repens (L.) Desv). Neth J Agric Sci 30:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes PW, Jordan PW, Gold WG, Flint SD, Caldwell MM (1988) Competition, morphology and canopy structure in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and wild oat (Avena fatua L.) exposed to enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation. Funct Ecol 2:319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes PW, Beyschlag W, Ryel R, Flint SD, Caldwell MM (1990) Plant competition for light analyzed with a multispecies canopy model. III. Influence of canopy structure in mixtures and monocultures of wheat and wild oat. Oecologia 82:560–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berendse F (1990) Organic matter accumulation and nitrogen mineralization during secondary succession in heathland ecosystems. J Ecol 78:413–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Berendse F, Elberse WT (1989) Competition and nutrient losses from the plant. In: Lambers H et al. (eds), Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 269–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Berendse F, Oudhof H, Bol J (1987) A comparative study on nutrient cycling in wet heathland ecosystems. I Litter production and nutrient losses from the plant. Oecologia 74:174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boot RGA (1989) The significance of size and morphology of root systems for nutrient acquisition and competition. In: Lambers H et al. (eds), Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 299–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot RGA, Den Dubbelden K (1990) Effects of nitrogen supply on growth, allocation and gas exchange characteristics of two perennial grasses from inland dunes. Oecologia 85:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boot RGA, Mensink M (1990) Size and morphology of root systems of perennial grasses from contrasting habitats as affected by nitrogen supply. Plant and Soil 129:291–299

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R (1962a) Distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth J Agric Sci 10:361–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R (1962b) Nutritive influences on the distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth J Agric Sci 10:399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell MM (1987) Competition between root systems in natural communities. In: Gregory RJ, Lake JV, Rose DA (eds) Root development and function. Society for Experimental Botany, Seminar Series 30, Cambridge University Press, pp 167–185

  • Caldwell MM, Richards JH (1986) Competing roots systems: morphology and models of absorption. In: Givnish TJ (ed), On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 251–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conolly J, Wayne P, Murray R (1990) Time course of plant-plant interactions in experimental mixtures of annuals: density, frequency, and nutrient effects. Oecologia 82:513–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick JC, Grime JP (1987) Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology. New Phytol 107:403–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Eissenstat DM, Caldwell MM (1988) Competitive ability is linked to rates of water extraction: a field study of two arid tussock grasses. Oecologia 75:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissenstat DM, Caldwell MM (1989) Invasive root growth into disturbed soil of two tussock grasses that differ in competitive effectiveness. Funct Ecol 3:345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennik GC, Baan Hofman T (1983) Variation in the root mass of ryegrass types and its ecological consequences. Neth J Agric Sci 31:325–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson SK, Tilman D (1990) Allocation and the transient dynamics of succession on poor soils. Ecology 71:1144–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1988) Limiting factors for modellers. Nature 336:630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Hodgson JG (1987) Botanical contributions to contemporary ecological theory. In: Rorison IH, Grime JP, Hunt R, Hendry GAF, Lewis DH (eds) Frontiers of comparative plant ecology, Academic Press, London. New Phytol (Supplement) 106:283–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Crick JC, Rincon JE (1986) The ecological significance of plasticity. In: Jennings DH, Trewavas AJ (eds) Plasticity in plants, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 5–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Mackey JML, Hillier SH, Read DJ (1987) Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature 328:420–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Campbell BD, Mackey JML, Crick JC (1990) Root plasticity, nitrogen capture and competitive ability. In: Atkinson D (ed), Plant root systems. Their effect on ecosystem composition and structure. Proceedings BES Symposium, Aberdeen, September 1988 (in press)

  • Heil GW, Bruggink M (1987) Competition for nutrients betweenCalluna vulgaris (L.) Hull andMolinia caerulea (L.) Moench. Oecologia 73:105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson PS (1985) Effects of water and mineral nutrient supply on a deciduous and an evergreen dwarfshrub:Vaccinium uliginosum L. andV. vitis-idaea L. Holarctic Ecol 8:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Konings H, Koot E, Tijman-de Wolf A (1989) Growth characteristics, nutrient allocation and photosynthesis ofCarex species from floating fens. Oecologia 80:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Dijkstra P (1987) A physiological analysis of genotypic variation in relative growth rate: Can growth rate confer ecological advantage? In: Van Andel J et al. (eds), Disturbance in Grasslands. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 237–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud A, Grime JP (1976) An analysis of competitive ability in three perennial grasses. New Phytol 77:431–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchley J (1988) Control of relative abundance of perennials in chalk grassland in Southern England. II. Vertical canopy structure. J Ecol 76:341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsi M, Saeki T (1953) Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Jap J Bot 14:22–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Olff H, Van Andel J, Bakker JP (1990) Biomass and shoot/root allocation of five species from a grassland succession series at different combinations of light and nutrient supply. Funct Ecol 4:193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegtel BM (1976) On the ecology of two varieties ofSonchus arvensis L. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen

  • Poorter H, Remkes C (1990) Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia 83:553–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Rorison IH (1988) Plasticity in grass species in relation to nitrogen supply. Funct Ecol 2:249–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Roush ML, Radosevich SR (1985) Relationships between growth and competitiveness of four annual weeds. J Appl Ecol 22: 895–905

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1985) SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers, Version 6 Edition. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitters CJT, Aerts R (1983) Simulation of competition for light and water in crop-weed associations. Aspects of Applied Biology 4:467–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K (1987) The resource ratio hypothesis and the meaning of competition. Funct Ecol 1:297–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Grime JP (1988) Competition reconsidered — a reply to Tilman. Funct Ecol 2:114–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1985) The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am Nat 125:827–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1987) On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority. Funct Ecol 1:304–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Cowan ML (1989) Growth of old field herbs on a nitrogen gradient. Funct Ecol 3:425–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1988a) The effect of initial advantage on the course of plant competition. Oikos 51:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1988b) Shoot competition and root competition. J Appl Ecol 25:279–296

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aerts, R., Boot, R.G.A. & van der Aart, P.J.M. The relation between above- and belowground biomass allocation patterns and competitive ability. Oecologia 87, 551–559 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320419

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320419

Key words

Navigation