Summary
We use field and laboratory experiments to determine whether Hyphydrus ovatus, a predatory aquatic beetle, is food limited, and whether any food shortage results from depletion of prey by these predators (intrinsic food shortage) or is independent of predation by these beetles (extrinsic food shortage). In the laboratory, differences in feeding rate influence body fat content, thus making fat content a useful index of recent feeding history. H. ovatus collected during the breeding season have fat contents significantly greater than those of H. ovatus starved for 25 days, but not significantly different from those of H. ovatus fed ad libitum for 25 days, indicating that natural feeding rates are near the maximum possible. H. ovatus confined at a density 60 times greater than natural show reduced fat content and feeding rate relative to natural, indicating that at very high densities H. ovatus is capable of depleting its prey. Addition of supplemental natural prey (primarily Cladocera) to experimental enclosures resulted in an order of magnitude increase in prey availability, and a significant increase in fat content and feeding rate of confined H. ovatus. Adults of this species do not appear to be food limited during the breeding season, and extraordinarily high densities of adults seem to be necessary to produce intrinsic food shortage. These results suggest that feeding links between H. ovatus an its principal prey do not have major effects on population dynamics under typical field conditions, and call into question the assumption that closely coupled predator-prey interactions are the sole explanation for observed food-web patterns.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrewartha HG, Birch LC (1984) The Ecological Web. More on the distribution and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Balfour-Browne J (1940) British Water Beetles. Vol. I. The Ray Society, London
Bistrom O (1982) A revision of the genus Hyphydrus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Contribution to the study of Dytiscidae. 5. Acta Zool Fenn 165: 1–121
Eisenberg RM, Hurd LE, Bartley JA (1981) Ecological consequences of food limitation for adult mantids (Tenodera ardifolia sinensis Saussure). Am Mid Nat 106: 209–218
Evans HF (1976) The effect of prey density and host plant characteristics on oviposition and fertility in Anthocoris confusus (Reuter). Ecol Entomol 1: 157–161
Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat 94: 421–425
Herbes SE, Allen CP (1983) Lipid quantification of freshwater invertebrates: Method modification for microquantitation. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 40: 1315–1317
Ives PM (1981) Feeding and egg production of two species of coccinellids in the laboratory. Can Entomol 113: 999–1005
Juliano SA (1986a) Food limitation of reproduction and survival for populations of Brachinus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ecology 67: 1036–1045
Juliano SA (1986b) A test for competition for food among adult Brachinus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ecology 67: 1655–1664
Juliano SA (1986c) Resistance to desiccation and starvation of two species of Brachinus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from southeastern Arizona. Can J Zool 64: 73–80
Juliano SA, Lawton JH (1990a) The relationship between competition and morphology. I. Morphological patterns among cooccurring dytiscid beetles. J Anim Ecol 59: 401–418
Juliano SA, Lawton JH (1990b) The relationship between competition and morphology. II. Experiments on co-occurring dytiscid beetles. J Anim Ecol 59 (in press)
Lawton JH (1971) Maximum and actual field feeding rates in larvae of the damselfly, Pyrrhosoma nymphula (Sulzer) (Odonata: Zygoptera). Fresh Biol 1: 99–111
Lawton JH (1989) Food webs. In: Cherrett JM (ed) Ecological concepts. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 43–78
Lawton JH, Warren PH (1988) Static and dynamic explanations for patterns in food webs. Trends Ecol Evol 3: 242–245
Lenski RE (1984) Food limitation and competition: a field experiment with two Carabus species. J Anim Ecol 53: 203–216
Matsura T, Morooka K (1983) Influences of prey density on fecundity in a mantis Paratenodera angustipennis (S.). Oecologia 56: 303–312
Matsura T, Inoue T, Hosomi Y (1975) Ecological studies of a mantid, Paratenodera angustipennis DeSaussure I. Evaluation of feeding condition in natural habitats. Res Popul Ecol 17: 64–76
Paine RT (1980) Food webs: Linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure. J Anim Ecol 49: 667–685
Paine RT (1988) Food webs: Road maps of interactions or grist for theoretical development? Ecology 69: 1648–1654
Pimm SL (1982) Food Webs. Chapman and Hall, London
Polis GA, McCormick SJ (1987) Intraguild predation and competition among desert scorpions. Ecology 68: 332–343
Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1985) Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
SAS Institute Inc (1987) SAS/STATTM Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary
Schoener TW (1989) Food webs from the small to the large. Ecology 70: 1559–1589
Sota T (1985) Limitation of reprodution by feeding condition in a carabid beetle, Carabus yaconinus. Res Popul Ecol 27: 171–184
Warren PH (1988) The structure and dynamics of a freshwater benthic foodweb. D. Phil. Thesis. University of York, York, UK
Wise DH (1979) Effects of an experimental increase in prey abundance upon reproductive rates of two orb-weaving spider species (Arnaeae: Araneidae). Oecologia 41: 289–300
Wise DH (1983) The role of competition in spider communities: insights from field experiments with a model organism. In: Strong DR Jr, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological Communities, Conceptual Issues and the Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 42–53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Juliano, S.A., Lawton, J.H. Extrinsic vs. intrinsic food shortage and the strength of feeding links: effects of density and food availability on feeding rate of Hyphydrus ovatus . Oecologia 83, 535–540 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317206
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317206