Skip to main content
Log in

Insights fourth and fifth graders bring to multiplication and division with decimals

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to gain information about the understandings children in Israel and the United States have about multiplication and division of whole numbers that may be useful in building accurate understandings of these operations with decimals and the extent to which they hold conceptions about these operations that may interfere with their work with decimals. Data from interviews of the fourth and fifth graders indicate that students of this age already hold misconceptions such as “multiplication always makes bigger.” However they also hold conceptions that are prerequisite to understanding the area model of multiplication and the measurement model of division. These early conceptions might be used to build understanding of multiplication and division by decimals. Implications for the content and sequencing of instructional activities are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BellA. W.: 1982, ‘Diagnosing students misconceptions’, Australian Mathematics Teacher 38, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • BellA. W., E.Fischbein, and B.Greer: 1984, ‘Choice of operation in verbal arithmetic problems: The effects of number size, problem structure and content’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 15, 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • BellA., M.Swan, and G.Taylor: 1981, ‘Choice of operation in verbal problems with decimal numbers’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, 399–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • BrownM.: 1981, ‘Place value and operations’, in K. M.Hart (ed.), Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11–16, pp. 48–65, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • CarpenterT. C., M. K.Corbitt, H. S.Kepner, M. M.Lindquist, and R. E.Reys: 1981, ‘Decimals: Results and implications from national assessment’, Arithmetic Teacher 28(8), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • CaseR.: 1985, Intellectual Development: Birth to Adulthood, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DavisR.: 1984, Learning Mathematics: The Cognitive Science Approach to Mathematics Education, Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • EkenstamA.: 1977, ‘On children's quantitative understanding of numbers’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 8, 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • FischbeinE., M.Deri, M. S.Nello, and M. S.Marino: 1985, ‘The role of implicit models in solving problems in multiplication and division’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 16, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • FischbeinE.: 1987, Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach, Kluwer Academic, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, A. O. and K. Baker: (in press), ‘Curriculum materials and misconceptions concerning multiplication and division’, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics.

  • GraeberA. O., D.Tirosh, and R.Glover: 1989, ‘Preservice teachers' misconceptions in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20(1), 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • GreerB. and C.Mangan: 1986, ‘Choice of operations: From 10-year-olds to student teachers’, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 25–30, University of London, Institute of Education, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • HartK. (ed.): 1981, Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11–16, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J. and D. Wearne: 1983, April, ‘Students' conceptions of decimal numbers’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.

  • KieranT. E.: 1980, ‘Knowing rational numbers: Ideas and symbols’, in M. M.Lindquist (ed.), Selected Issues in Mathematics Education, pp. 69–81, McCutchan, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnightC., J.Crosswhite, J.Dossey, E.Kifer, J.Swafford, K.Travers, and T.Cooney: 1987, The Underachieving Curriculum: Assessing U.S. School Mathematics from an International Perspective, Stipes Publishing, Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • SemadeniZ.: 1984, ‘A principle of concretization permanence for the formation of arithmetical concepts’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 15, 379–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • SowderL.: 1986, ‘Strategies children use in solving problems’, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 469–474, University of London, Institute of Education, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L.: (in press), ‘Children's construction of meaning for arithmetical words: A curriculum problem’, in D. Tirosh (ed.), Implicit and Explicit Knowledge: An Educational Approach.

  • SwanM.: 1983, Teaching decimal place value: A comparative study of ‘conflict’ and ‘positive only’ approaches, Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • ThorndikeE.: 1921, The New Methods in Arithmetic, Rand McNally, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • TiroshD.: 1989, ‘Division and multiplication: What is in textbooks?’ (unpublished manuscript), Tel-Aviv University, (in Hebrew, Tel-Aviv.

    Google Scholar 

  • TiroshD. and A. O.Graeber: 1989, ‘Preservice elementary teachers' explicit beliefs about multiplication and division’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(1), 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graeber, A.O., Tirosh, D. Insights fourth and fifth graders bring to multiplication and division with decimals. Educ Stud Math 21, 565–588 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315945

Keywords

Navigation