Skip to main content
Log in

The orthopteran descending movement detector (DMD) neurones: a characterisation and review

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The thoracic connectives of the Acridoidea, Grylloidea and Tettigonioidea contain 2 units which appear functionally identical except that they are activated by ipsilateral and contralateral eyes respectively. They are purely visual, responding to dimming of small areas of the retina or to moving objects subtending small angles, but not to whole field stimulation (Fig. 8). The axons run from the optic lobe to the metathoracic ganglion; the contralateral unit crosses the brain in the tritocerebrum. Their relative sizes differ in the different taxa, but they appear functionally homologous.

  2. 2.

    The common identity of the units previously described by Palka and by Rowell and Horn is established, and areas of conflict are reexamined. The units do not respond to whole field stimulation caused by movement of the animal in a structured visual field. Palka found that the response to small area stimulation was totally inhibited during such movement, whereas Rowell and Horn did not. It is shown that the inhibition is graded, and is complete only at high angular velocities; also that it wanes if movement is sustained. Both descriptions of the units are correct, but were made at different angular velocities. At medium angular velocities of the whole field the unit responds adequately to normal stimuli, but at a somewhat diminished level (Fig. 3–5).

  3. 3.

    The units play no part in the optokinetic memory previously described in the locust (Fig. 6).

  4. 4.

    Activity of the visual units has no direct effect on any of the major thoracic motor output systems, nor upon the behaviour of chronically implanted freely moving animals (Fig. 7).

  5. 5.

    The occurrence, anatomy, response characteristics, afferent and efferent connections and function of the DMD units is reviewed. Their apparent specialisation for a “warning” function, plus the absence of direct motor output, leads to the speculation that they may switch the thoracic neuropile from thoracic to cerebral inputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett, D.: Receptive field organisation of units in the first optic ganglion of Diptera. Science, N.Y., in press (1971).

  • Bishop, L. G., Keehn, D. G.: Two types of neurones sensitive to motion in the optic lobe of the fly. Nature (Lond.) 212, 1374–1376 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, McCann, G. D.: Motion detection by interneurons of optic lobes and brain of the flies Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. J. Neurophysiol. 31, 509–525 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blest, A. D., Collett, T. S.: Micro-electrode studies of the medial protocerebrum of some Lepidoptera. I. Response to simple, binocular visual stimulation. J. Insect Physiol. 11, 1079–1103 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Micro-electrode studies of the medial protocerebrum of some Lepidoptera. II. Response to visual flicker. J. Insect Physiol. 11, 1289–1356 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, E. T., Catton, W. T.: Visual perception of movement in the locust. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 125, 566–580 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Electrical responses to visual stimulation in the optic lobes of the locust and certain other insects. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 133, 68–88 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Transmission of visual responses in the nervous system of the locust. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 146, 492–514 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The properties of single unit discharges in the optic lobes of the locust. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 154 479–490 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: A diffraction theory of insect vision. I. An experimental investigation of visual acuity and image formation in the compound eyes of three species of insects. Proc. roy. Soc. B 157, 53–82 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Perception by locusts of rotated patterns. Science, N. Y. 151, 224 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Resolution of the locust eye measured by rotation of radial striped patterns. Proc. roy. Soc. B 173, 513–529 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. T., Chakraborty, A.: Single neuron responses to visual and mechanical stimuli in the thoracic nerve cord of the locust. J. Insect Physiol. 15, 245–258 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W. D.: Motoneuron responses to visual stimuli in Oncopeltus fasciatus Dallas. J. exp. Biol. 45, 401–410 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, T. S.: Centripetal and centrifugal visual cells in medulla of the insect optic lobe. J. Neurophysiol. 33, 239–256 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Blest, A. D.: Binocular, directionally selective neurones, possibly involved in the optomotor response of insects. Nature (Lond.) 212, 1330–1333 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens, D. J.: Visual sensitivity in the light- and dark-adapted compound eye of the desert locust. J. Insect Physiol. 12, 871–890 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, N.: Kommandofasern im Zentralnervensystem der Heuschrecke Gastrimargus africanus (Oedipodinae). Zool. Anz., Suppl. 33, Verh. deutsch, zool. Ges. 1969, 465–471 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, G., Rowell, C., H. F.: Medium and long-term changes in the behaviour of visual neurones in the tritocerebrum of locusts. J. exp. Biol. 49, 143–169 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge, G. A.: Optokinetic memory in the locust. J. exp. Biol. 44, 255–262 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Scholes, J. H., Shaw, S., Tunstall, J.: Extracellular recordings from single neurones in the optic lobe and brain of the locust. In: The physiology of the insect central nervous system, ed. J. E. Treherne and J. W. L. Beament. London: Academic Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, G.: Exploration of neuronal mechanisms underlying behaviour in insects. In: Neural theory and modelling, ed. R. F. Reiss. Stanford U. P. 1964.

  • —: An isolated insect ganglion-nerve-muscle preparation. J. exp. Biol. 44, 413–428 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, F.: Central control of movements and behavior of invertebrates. In: Invertebrate nervous systems (ed. C. A. G. Wiersma). Chicago U. P. 1967.

  • Ishikawa, S.: Visual response patterns of single ganglion cells in the optic lobe of the silk worm moth, Bombyx mori L. J. Insect Physiol. 8, 485–491 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameda, K.: Electrical acitivity of optic ganglion cells in locust (Orthoptera). Bull. Tokyo med. dent. Univ. 11, 281–295 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, G. D., Dill, J. C.: Fundamental properties of intensity, form and motion perception in the visual nervous system of Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. J. gen. Physiol. 53, 385–413 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S. F.: Binocular interactions of motion detection fibres in the optic lobes of flies. Kybernetik, in press (1971).

  • Northrop, R. B., Guignon, E. F.: Information processing in the optic lobes of the lubber grasshopper. J. Insect Physiol. 16, 691–713 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palka, J.: Diffraction and visual acuity in insects. Science, N. Y. 149, 551–553 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: An inhibitory process influencing visual responses in a fibre of the ventral nerve cord of locusts. J. Insect Physiol. 13, 235–248 (1967a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Head movement inhibits locust visual unit's response to target movement. Amer. Zool. 7, 728 (1967b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Discrimination between movements of eye and object by visual interneurones of crickets. J. exp. Biol. 50, 723–732 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, D. A.: The function of the insect ocellus. J. exp. Biol. 24, 211–219 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, C. H. F.: A general method for silvering invertebrate central nervous systems. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 104, 81–87 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, C. H. F.: Variable responsiveness of the DCMD neurone in the free-moving locust, and its relation to behaviour and arousal. J. exp. Biol., in press (1971a).

  • - - Antennal cleaning, arousal, and visual neurone responsiveness in the locust. J. exp. Biol., in press (1971b).

  • —, Horn, G.: Response characteristics of neurones in an insect brain. Nature (Lond.) 216, 702–703 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Dishabituation and arousal in the response of single nerve cells in an insect brain. J. exp. Biol. 49, 171–183 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Satija, R. C.: Studies on the course and functions of the giant nerve fibres from the eye and the tegumentary nerve to the ventral nerve cord in Locusta migratoria. Res. Bull. Panjab Univ. 132, 511–519 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: A histological and experimental study of nervous pathways in the brain and thoracic nerve cord of Locusta migratoria migratorioides. Res. Bull. Panjab Univ. 137, 13–22 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga, N., Katsuki, Y.: Vision in insects in terms of the electrical activities of the descending nerve fibres. Nature (Lond.) 194, 658–660 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart, S. L.: Single unit activity in the visual pathway of the butterfly Heliconius erato. J. Insect Physiol. 14, 1589–1601 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall, J., Horridge, G. A.: Electrophysiological investigation of the optics of the locust retina. Z. vergl. Physiol. 55, 167–182 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowell, C.H.F. The orthopteran descending movement detector (DMD) neurones: a characterisation and review. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 73, 167–194 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304131

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304131

Keywords

Navigation