Skip to main content
Log in

Genetics of self incompatibility in diploid Ageratum houstonianum mill

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Diallels and backcrosses among self-incompatible (SI) clones and progeny of Ageratum houstonianum Mill. could be organized into intra-incompatible classes. Four of 5 progenies segregated in expected ratios of S genotypes. Ageratum expressed a one-locus incompatibility system of the sporophytic type with a linear dominance series of multiple alleles and complete allelic dominance in both pollen and stigma. In the second part of the study, a high percentage of self-seed set was observed during the first flowering of a progeny from a pseudo-self compatible (PSC) seed source. Six progenies were derived from the PSC seed source. Five of the 6 segregated PSC ∶ SI plants, 4 of which fit a 3 ∶ 1 ratio of PSC ∶ SI plants. All plants of the sixth progeny were SI. Two F1 progenies with the same PSC pollen parent produced significantly different segregations of PSC ∶ SI plants. It appeared that PSC acted as a major gene when the most recessive S allele was also present, but PSC was not expressed when the most dominant S allele was present. Clones propagated from PSC plants were SI and cross incompatible with a related S-allele tester. Thus, PSC was transient in that it was apparent in seed-propagated plants but not in plants clonally propagated from the PSC individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Ascher, P.D. (1976): Self-incompatibility systems in floriculture crops. Acta Hortic. 63, 205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J.G.; Parlevliet, J.E. (1969): Incompatibility as a new method for identification of pyrethrum clones. Euphytica 18, 320–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, L.K. (1954): Incompatibility in Cosmos bipinnatus. Heredity 8, 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewlow, L.W.; Ascher, P.D.; Widmer, R.E. (1973): Genetic studies of self incompatibiliy in the garden chrysanthemum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 43, 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Eenink, A.H. (1981): Compatibility and incompatibility in witloofchicory (Cichorium intybus L.). 2: The incompatibility system. Euphytica 30, 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel, D.U.; Riner, M.E. (1950): Self-incompatibility studies in guayule. 1: Pollen-tube behavior. J. Hered. 41, 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel, D.U. (1950): Self-incompatibility studies in guayule. 2: Inheritance. Genetics 35, 482–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Habura, E. (1957): Parasterilität bei Sonnenblumen. Z. Pflanzenzücht. 37, 280–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M.B.; Babcock, E.B. (1950): Self-incompatibility in Crepis foetida (L.) subsp. rhoedifolia. Genetics 35, 570–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, B.C.; Knowles, P.F. (1971): Genetic studies of self incompatibility in Carthamus flavescens. Crop Sci. 11, 6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann-Phillipp, R. (1965): The application of incompatibility in plant breeding. In: Genetics today 3, pp. 649–656. The Hague: XI. Int. Cong. Genet. 1963

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. F. Linskens

Scientific Journal Series Paper Number 12,299 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stephens, L.C., Ascher, P.D. & Widmer, R.E. Genetics of self incompatibility in diploid Ageratum houstonianum mill. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 63, 387–394 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303913

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303913

Key words

Navigation