Skip to main content
Log in

Female preferences for male calling bout duration in a field cricket

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The calls of male field crickets attract sexually receptive females. In Gryllus integer, males differ from one another in their durations of uninterrupted calling (calling bout lengths). Tape recordings of the calls of 50 wild-caught males revealed that 14 males spent most of their calling time in short bouts (Fig. 1A), 18 in both short and long bouts (Fig. 1B), and 18 in long bouts (Fig. 1C). Re-recordings of 32 males after 3 weeks showed that calling bout lengths of individual males are stable with time (age) (Fig. 2). Three phonotaxis experiments investigated whether calling bout lengths of males affect female preferences. They demonstrated that (1) females can discriminate among conspecific males on the basis of calls alone; (2) females are preferentially attracted to males with long calling bout lengths; and (3) calling bout length is the specific factor responsible for preferential attraction. These results precisely identify a criterion that females use to discriminate among potential mates of their own species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In: Pimentel D (ed) Insects, science and society. Academic Press, New York (pp 35–77)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1982) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ (1985) Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Experientia 41:1296–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • Boake CRB (1983) Mating systems and signals in crickets. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview Press, Boulder (pp 28–44)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boake CRB, Capranica RR (1982) Aggressive signal in “courtship” chirps of a gregarious cricket. Science 218:580–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (pp 109–138)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk T (1983) Male aggression and female choice in a field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus): the importance of courtship song. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview Press, Boulder (pp 97–119)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH (1981) Alternative male strategies: genetic differences in crickets. Science 212:563–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH, Wyatt D (1984) Factors affecting calling behavior in field crickets, Teleogryllus and Gryllus (age, weight, density and parasites). Behaviour 88:61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Crankshaw OS (1979) Female choice in relation to calling and courtship songs in Acheta domesticus. Anim Behav 27:1274–1275

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest TG (1983) Calling songs and mate choice in mole crickets. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview Press, Boulder (pp 185–204)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1982) Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrops (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for mate choice. Am Zool 22:581–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1983) Male nutritional investment and the evolution of sexual differences in Tettigoniidae and other Orthoptera. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview Press, Boulder (pp 337–366)

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (pp 3–32)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science 218:384–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy RR, Pollack GS, Moiseff A (1982) Species-recognition in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus: behavioral and neural mechanisms. Am Zool 22:597–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Majerus MEN, O'Donald P, Weir J (1982) Female mating preference is genetic. Nature 300:521–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1980) Female mate choice in a neotropical frog. Science 209:523–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA (1982) The evolutionary effects of mate selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:57–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker TJ (1957) Specificity in the response of female tree crickets to calling songs of males. Ann Entomol Soc Am 50:626–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Hedrick AV (1982) Speciation and the economics of mate choice. Evol Theory 6:15–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedrick, A.V. Female preferences for male calling bout duration in a field cricket. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19, 73–77 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303845

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303845

Keywords

Navigation