Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic relatedness and colony organization in a species complex of ponerine ants

II. Patterns of sex ratio investment

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the Rhytidoponera impressa group, populations of Type A (queenright, monogynous) colonies produce numerous colony-founding queens and have markedly female-biassed sex ratios of investment, the mean proportional investment in females (PF) being 0.824 for thirteen populations of confusa, chalybaea, and purpurea (0.839 for ten confusa populations). (All proportional means are retransformed from the angular transformation.)

By contrast, Type B (worker-reproductive, usually polygynous) colonies reproduce by colony fission and show less female-biassed investment ratios, with mean PF values (12 populations, 2 species) ranging from 0.358 to 0.721, for estimates of colony fission costs ranging from 10% to 50% of the worker force.

The population PF for Type A colonies shows significant positive correlations with the relative frequency (r=0.63, df=11, P<0.025) and density (r=0.70, df=11, P<0.01) of sympatric Type B colonies, indicating that Type A colonies compensate for male bias in the community sex ratio generated by Type B colonies.

In one population (of purpurea) consisting entirely of Type A colonies, the estimated population PF was 0.736. In the absence of evidence for inbreeding or local mate competition, this suggests worker control of the investment ratio.

There is a substantial amount of unexplained intrapopulation variation in colony sex ratios. Colony-level PF values for Type A colonies range from 0.00 to 1.00, and are not significantly correlated with colony size, number of alates, worker size, or weights of alates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD, Sherman PW (1977) Local mate competition and parental investment in social insects. Science 196:494–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford FA (1978) Fisher's theory of the sex ratio applied to the social Hymenoptera. J Theor Biol 72:701–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, van der Lee GA, van der Have TM (1982) On the production ecology of Lasius niger L. in successive coastal dune valleys. J Anim Ecol 51:975–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian MV (1979) Habitat differences in sexual production by two co-existent ants. J Anim Ecol 48:934–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig R (1980) Sex investment ratios in social Hymenoptera. Am Nat 116:311–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Clarendon

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth A (1981) Sex ratio and parental investment in an ant population. Evolution 35:1252–1253

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3:193–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Macevicz S (1979) Some consequency of Fisher's sex ratio principle for social. Hymenoptera that reproduce by colony fission. Am Nat 113:363–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf RA (1980) Sex ratios, parent-offspring conflict, and local competition for mates in the social wasps Polistes metricus and Polistes variatus. Am Nat 116:642–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster G, Eshel I, Cohen D (1977) Worker-queen conflict and the evolution of social insects. Theor Popul Biol 12:49–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen RE, Rodd FH, Plowright RC (1980) Sex ratios in bumble bee colonies: complications due to orphaning? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:287–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1982) Genetic evolution of sex ratios in eusocial Hymenoptera: allele frequency simulations. Am Nat 119:638–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P, Rosengren R (1983) Sex ratio strategies in Formica ants. Oikos 40:24–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyenoyama MK, Bengtsson BO (1981) Towards a genetic theory for the evolution of the sex ratio. II. Haplodiploid and diploid models with sibling and parental control of the brood sex ratio and brood size. Theor Popul Biol 20:57–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward PS (1980) Genetic variation and population differentiation in the Rhytidoponera impressa group, a species complex of ponerine ants. Evolution 34:1060–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward PS (1981a) Ecology and life history of the Rhytidoponera impressa group. I. Habitats, nest sites, and foraging behavior. Psyche 88:89–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward PS (1981b) Ecology and life history of the Rhytidoponera impressa group. II. Colony origin, seasonal cycles, and reproduction. Psyche 88:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward PS (1983) Genetic relatedness and colony organization in a species complex of ponerine ants. I. Gentoypic and phenotypic composition of colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:285–299

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, P.S. Genetic relatedness and colony organization in a species complex of ponerine ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12, 301–307 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302897

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302897

Keywords

Navigation