Abstract
This study explores for differences in self-concept among male and female primary and secondary teachers and the possible influence of such differences on how the teachers perceive the nature of mathematics and their attitudes to the teaching and learning of mathematics. Sixteen teachers, eight from primary schools and eight from secondary schools participated in this study. Within each school type there were four males and four females with two of each gender displaying very high self-concept and two displaying very low self-concept as measured by the Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ III). The teachers were interviewed to gain insights into how they formulated individual perceptions of themselves as mathematicians and as teachers of mathematics. Through these interviews their perceived influence on the attitudes of their students to mathematics were also determined. Although some gender differences did emerge, the greatest differences in attitudes to mathematics, to the teaching of mathematics and perceptions of themselves as salient role models were found between teachers with very high and very low self-concept profiles. These results have implications for the conduct of pre-service and in-service training for teachers of mathematics, particularly at the primary level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BarnesM.: 1983, ‘Sex differences in mathematics learning: A reappraisal of the importance of cognitive factors, Research in Mathematics Education in Australia 1, 2–6.
BeckerJ. R.: 1981, ‘Differential treatment of females and males in mathematics classes,’ Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 12, 40–53.
BenbowC. P.: 1992, ‘Academic achievement in mathematics and science students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability?’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 57–61.
BenbowC. P., and StanleyJ. C.: 1983, ‘Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts’, Science 222, 1029–1031.
BoliJ., AllenJ.L., and PayneA.: 1985, ‘High ability women and men in undergraduate mathematics and chemistry courses’, American Educational Researcher 15, 73–83.
BrandonP. R., NewtonB. J., and HammondO. W.: 1987, ‘Children's mathematics achievement in Hawaii: Sex differences favoring girls’, American Educational Research Journal 24, 437–461.
EcclesJ., and BlumenfeldP.: 1985, ‘Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter?’ In L. C.Wilkinson and C. B.Marrett (eds), Gender Influences in Classroom Interaction. New York: Academic Press.
EthingtonC. A., and WolfleL. M.: 1984, ‘Sex differences in a casual model of mathematics achievement’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 361–377.
EthingtonC. A., and WolfleL. M.: 1986 ‘A structural model of mathematics achievement for men and women’ American Educational Research Journal, 23, 65–75.
FarmerH. S.: 1987, ‘A multivariate model for explaining gender differences in career and achievement motivation’, Educational Researcher, 16 (2), 5–9.
FriedmanL.: 1989, ‘Mathematics and the gender gap: A meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks’, Review of Educational Research, 59, 185–213.
Leder, G.: 1986, November, Teacher-Student Interactions-a Hidden Message. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne.
LederG.: 1988, ‘Teacher student interaction: The mathematics classroom’, Unicorn, 14, 107–111.
MarshH. W.: 1988, ‘Causal effects of Academic self-concept on academic achievement: A reanalysis of Newman (1984)’, Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 100–104.
MarshH. W.: 1990, ‘A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification’, Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–172.
MarshH. W.: 1992, ‘Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 35–42.
MarshH. W. and O'NeillR.: 1984, ‘Self Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late-adolescents’, Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153–174.
MarshH. W., RelichJ. D., and SmithI.: 1983, ‘Self-concept: The construct validity of interpretations based upon the SDQ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173–187.
MarshH. W., SmithI. D., and BarnesJ.: 1985, ‘Multidimensional self-concepts: Relations with sex and academic achievement’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 581–596.
MeeceJ. L., ParsonsJ. E., KaczalaC. M., GoffS. B., and FuttermanR.: 1982, ‘Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice’, Psychological Bulletin, 91, 324–348.
MidgleyC., FeldlauferH., and EcclesJ. S.: 1989, ‘Change in teacher efficacy and student self and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247–258.
MuraR.: 1987, ‘Sex-related differences in expectations of success in undergraduate mathematics’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 15–24.
Parker, L.: 1984, November, ‘Sex Differences in Mathematics: Trends in Participation and Achievement 1976–1983’, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Perth.
ParkerL., and OfferJ.: 1987, ‘Girls, boys and lower secondary school achievement: The shifting scene 1972–1986’, Unicorn, 13 (3), 148–154.
RelichJ. D., ConroyJ. and WebberV.: 1991, Gender Differences in Self-Concept: Male and Female Mathematics Teachers as Role Models. Sydney NSW: Department of School Education.
RelichJ. D., WayJ., and MartinA.: 1994, ‘Attitudes to teaching mathematics: Further development of a measurement instrument’, Mathematics Education Reserch Journal, 6, 56–69.
ShavelsonR. J., HubnerJ. J., and StantonG. C.: 1976, ‘Validation of construct interpretations’, Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
ThomasB., and CostelloJ.: 1988, ‘Identifying attitudes to mathematics’, Mathematics Teaching, 122, 62–64.
WheelesV. E., and PotortiP. F.: 1989, ‘Student assessment of teacher masculinity and femininity: A test of sex role congruency hypothesis on student attitudes toward learning’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 259–262.
WillisS.: 1989, Real Girls Don't Do Maths: Gender and the Construction of Privilege, Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Relich, J. Gender, self-concept and teachers of mathematics: Effects on attitudes to teaching and learning. Educ Stud Math 30, 179–195 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302629
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302629