Skip to main content
Log in

The mating system of two hybridizing species of water striders (Gerridae)

I. Ripple signal functions

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In Alberta and British Columbia, breeding males of pond-dwelling Limnoporus dissortis and L. notabilis defend territories around floating leaves and produce ripple signals (repel signals) at intruders. Before and during mating and oviposition, males also produce courtship signals, and repel signals if intruders appear. Females do not maintain territories or produce repel signals. In the field, repel signals were recorded and analyzed by computer, then played back by oscillating a leaf tip with a magnet. Dead females (models) in natural position were guided with thread into territories, to entice males to signal. Models were guided so the forelegs were within 3 mm of a magnetbearing leaftip. Repel-signaling males approached models closely, then switched to courtship signals, wherepon playbacks of repel signals caused the males immediately to reply with repel signals and attack the model. Males thus distinguished sex by presence or absence of the repel signal. With a dead male L. notabilis pinned near a magnet on a territory leaf, playbacks were made to patrolling Limnoporus and Gerris buenoi males that skated by and showed interest in the model. After playbacks, Limnoporus notabilis (large) males skated away at the usual slow patrolling pace, but hybrid (medium) and L. dissortis (small) males skated away rapidly, indicating that repel signals repel at least smaller intruder males. Gerris buenoi males skated away slowly after playbacks, their relatively small size indicating that small size was not by itself a necessary reason for a strider to skate rapidly away. Coexistent Limnoporus dissortis and L. notabilis hybridize extensively in Alberta and British Columbia. Waveform and frequency comparisons of repel signals from pure and hybrid individuals showed no significant difference in these characteristics. Repel signals from both species resulted in similar playback responses from both species, indicating that in this area ripple signals are not involved effectively in species discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD (1967) Acoustical communication in arthropods. Ann Rev Entomol 12:495–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Austad SN Howard RD (eds) (1984) Alternative reproductive tactics (symposium). Am Zool 24:305–418

  • Hayashi K (1985) Alternative reproductive strategies in the water strider Gerris elongatus (Heteroptera, Gerridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:301–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Nummelin M (1982) An easy method for measuring surface wave signals. Ann Zool Fenn 19:237–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf JL (1981) Biometry (2nd ed). WH Freeman & Co, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence JR, Scudder GG (1980) Habitats, life cycles, and guild structure among water striders (Heteroptera: Gerridae) on the Fraser Plateau of British Columbia. Can Entomol 112:779–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence JR, Wilcox RS (1986) The mating system of two hybridizing species of water striders (Gerridae). II. Alternative tactics of males and females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Vepsäläinen K, Nummelin M (1985) Male territoriality in the waterstrider Limnoporus rufoscutellatus. Ann Zool Fenn 22:441–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RS (1972) Communication by surface waves: mating behavior of a water strider. J Comp Physiol 80:255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RS (1979) Sex discrimination in Gerris remigis: role of a surface wave signal. Science 206:1325–1327

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RS (1984) Male copulatory guarding enhances female foraging in a water strider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RS, Kashinsky WM (1980) A computerized method of analyzing and playing back vibratory animal signals. Behav Res Meth Instr 12:361–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RS, Ruckdeschel T (1982) Food threshold territoriality in a water strider (Gerris remigis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:85–90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilcox, R.S., Spence, J.R. The mating system of two hybridizing species of water striders (Gerridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19, 79–85 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299942

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299942

Keywords

Navigation