Skip to main content
Log in

Risks and benefits of lethal male fighting in the colonial, polygynous thrips Hoplothrips karnyi (Insecta: Thysanoptera)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Males of Hoplothrips karnyi (Hood) (Insecta: Thysanoptera), a colonial fungus-feeding thrips, fight each other in defense of communal egg mass sites, where they mate with females that come to oviposit. Fighting males stab each other with their enlarged, armed forelegs and hit each other with their abdomens. Escalated fights occur between large males of similar size. Fights are often lethal; males that died during observations fought more frequently than other males, were stabbed more often and more severely than other males, and were relatively large, but somewhat smaller than their opponents. Large males tend to win fights and guard egg masses, and they secure about 80% of last matings before ovipositions. Guarding males apparently assess female reproductive condition by putting their forelegs partially around females' abdomens; guarding males, but not nonguarding males, mate preferentially with females that have yet to oviposit. Non-guarding males mate with females away from egg masses, sneak matings at egg masses, and occasionally challenge guarding males. Challenges tend to follow matings by non-guarding males at egg masses. Each of four observed or inferred takeovers was followed by the death of the guarding male that lost. Male fighting strategies are discussed in terms of the consistency of lethal fighting with game theory models. Guardin males appear to pursue a classical “hawk” strategy of “escalate until injured or victorious”. This strategy may be advantageous because only large males become guarders, the mating success of guarders greatly exceeds that of non-guarders, and high population viscosity ensures that benefits from killing an opponent accrue directly to gaurders. The occurrence of challenges by large non-guarders implies that fighting ability and resource value asymmetries between males change over time; such changes may result from the energetic costs of guarding, injury to guarding males, or depletion of guarding males' supply of sperm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ananthakrishnan TN (1979) Biosystematics of Thysanoptera. Ann Rev Entomol 24:159–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Ananthakrishnan TN (1984) Bioecology of Thrips. Indira Publishing. Oak Park, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki S, Makino S (1982) Gall usurpation and lethal fighting among fundatrices of the aphid Epipemphigus niisimae (Homoptera, Pemphigidae). Kontyu 50:365–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Arak A (1983) Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 181–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Austad SN (1983) A game-theoretical interpretation of male combat in the bowl and doily spider (Frontinella pyramitela). Anim Behav 31: 59–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode W (1978) Ultrastructure of the sternal glands of Thrips validus Uzel. Zoomorphologie 90:53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1982) The functions of antlers. Behaviour 79:108–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Gibson RM, Guinness FE (1979) The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Anim Behav 27:211–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan DP (1984) Life history and male dimorphism in the mite Kennethiella trisetosa (Acarina: Winterschmidtiidae), and its symbiotic relationship with the wasp Ancistroceres antilope (Hymenoptera: Eumenidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:725–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ (1986a) Territoriality and fighting in a colonial thrips, Hoplothrips pedicularius, and sexual dimorphism in Thysanoptera. Ecol Entomol 11: 119–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ (1986b) Size assessment and alternative fighting tactics in Elaphrothrips tuberculatus (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Anim Behav 34:1324–1335

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1978) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Halliday TR (1978) Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274:683–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119:601–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA, Sawrey DK (1984) Male capacity as related to sperm production, pregnancy initiation, and sperm competition in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominey W (1984) Alternative mating tactics and evolutionarily stable strategies. Am Zool 24:385–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1982) Beetle horn dimorphism: making the best of a bad lot. Am Nat 119:420–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW (1985) Influence of asymmetries in resource quality and age on aggression and dominance in black-chinned hummingbirds. Anim Behav 33:705–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox DJ, Guire KE (1976) Documentation for MIDAS. Statistical Research Laboratory, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M (1972) Male dimorphism as a consequence of sexual selection. Am Nat 106:574–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ (1987) The evolution of clutch size in parasitic wasps. Am Nat 129:221–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne D (1984) Male mating effort, confidence of paternity, and insect sperm competition. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 117–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1979) Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 167–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge AG (1981) The life history, social organization, and parental behavior of Hyla rosenbergi, a nest-building gladiator frog. Misc Pub Mus Zool Univ Michigan 160:1–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1982) Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): do residents always win? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis T (1973) Thrips: their biology, ecology, and economic importance. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R (1975) Courtship in parasitic wasps. In: Price PW (ed) Evolutionary stratgies of parasitic insects and mites. Plenum Press, New York, pp 66–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J Theor Biol 47:209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24:159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh T (1958) Social behavior of the American Buffalo. Zoologica 43:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray MG, Gerrard R (1984) Conflict in the neigh bourhood: models where close relatives are in direct competition. J Theor Biol 111:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatsuru K, Kramer DL (1982) Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the Lemon Tetra (Pisces, Characidae). Science 216:753–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Otronen M (1984) Male contests for territories and females in the fly Dryomyza anilis. Anim Behav 32:891–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Rubenstein DI (1981) Role assessment, reserve strategy, and the acquisition of information in asymmetric animal contests. Anim Behav 29:221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter DA, Wrensch DL, Johnston DE (1976) Aggression and mating success in spider mites. Science 193:160–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramer JD, Jensen TA, Hurst CJ (1983) Size-related variation in the advertisement call of Rana clamitans (Anura: Ranidae) and its effect on conspecific males. Copeia 1983:141–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand AS, Rand WM (1976) Agonistic displays in nesting iguanas: a stochastic analysis of dispute settlement dominated by the minimization of energy costs. Z Tierpsychol 40:279–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1978) Game spiders play: behavioral variability in territorial disputes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:135–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SK (1985) Fighting and assessment in the yellowrumped cacique (Cacicus cela). Behav Ecol Socibiol 18:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein DI (1980) On the evolution of alternative mating strategies. In: Staddon JER (ed) Limits to action: the allocation of individual behavior. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee ecology. Princeton Univ Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjonsdottir H, Parker GA (1981) Dung fly struggles: evidence for assessment strategy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater PJB (1973) Describing sequences of behavior. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in ethology, vol. 1. Plenum Press, New York, pp 131–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods, 7th ed. Iowa State Univ Press, Ames, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Stannard LJ (1957) The phylogeny and classification of the North American genera of the suborder Tubulifera (Thysanoptera). Ill. Biol. Monographs 25. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Stannard LJ (1968) The thrips, or Thysanoptera of Illinois. Ill Nat Hist Surv Bull 29:215–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter RB, Keiley M (1984) Agonistic interactions between male Frontinella pyramitella (Aranae, Linyphiidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1984) Fighting and assessment in Harpobittacus scorpionflies. Evolution 38:204–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiemann DL (1967) Observations on the natural history of the western banded glowworm Zarhipis integripennis (Le-Conte) (Coleoptera: Phengodidae). Proc Cal Acad Sci 35:235–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Timms S, Ferro DN, Emberson RM (1980) Selective advantage of pleomorphic male Sancassania berlesei (Michael) (Acari: Acaridae). Int J Acarol 6:97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Assem J, Gijswijt MJ, Nubel BK (1980) Observations on courtship and mating strategies in a few species of parasitic wasps (Chalcidoidea). Neth J Zool 30:208–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson PF, Shank CC (1976) Rutting-fight mortality among musk oxen on Banks Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Anim Behav 24:756–758

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crespi, B.J. Risks and benefits of lethal male fighting in the colonial, polygynous thrips Hoplothrips karnyi (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22, 293–301 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299845

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299845

Keywords

Navigation