Abstract
In fights between males for access to mating territories, the winner may be the rival with the highest fighting capacity or that places the highest value on the disputed site. However, it is also possible that both factors simultaneously affect dispute settlement. Therefore, a better understanding of contest resolution rules may be achieved by simultaneously investigating how winning chances depend on individual motivation linked to resource value and on individual traits linked to fighting capacity. In this study, we used males of the dragonfly Micrathyria ungulata to evaluate whether individual fighting ability, individual motivation, or the interaction between both factors determine the individual investment in territorial contests. For this, we simulated the approach of an intruder to trigger a territorial defense response by either resident (marked males present in the territory for at least 1 day before the experiment) or substitute males (marked males that occupied the territories after we removed the residents). Resident males fought longer against the potential intruder than their substitute counterparts. However, traits related to fighting ability had a marginal effect on the time invested in fights. These results indicate that resident males are more willing to invest in fights regardless of their physical or physiological attributes. Distinct motivational levels among individuals should increase the variation in mean contest duration among rival pairs. If this effect is widespread, it may have important implications for studies that investigate contest rules by relating fighting duration and individual traits.
Significance statement
In many species, the winner of territorial fights is the individual with higher fighting ability or the one that values more the disputed resource and consequently is more motivated to fight. However, because these two factors may interact to determine the winner, investigations should benefit by simultaneously evaluating the effect of fighting ability and motivation on contest resolution. Here, we induced fights between focal males against artificially introduced rivals to test if male investment in fights is affected by an interaction between traits linked to fighting ability and motivational status. We showed that the prior occupation of a territory was the main determinant of the time spent fighting. We conclude that the previous occupation of a territory may increase individual motivation to fight due to higher valuation of the resource and eventually may surpass the effect of fighting ability to determine the winner.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcock J, Bailey WJ (1997) Success in territorial defence by male tarantula hawk wasp Hemipepsis ustulata: the role of residency. Ecol Entomol 22:377–383
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Arnott G, Elwood RW (2008) Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Anim Behav 76:529–542
Arnott G, Elwood RW (2009) Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:991–1004
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7, <URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4>
Bentley T, Hull TT, Hardy ICW, Goubault M (2009) The elusive paradox: owner–intruder roles, strategies, and outcomes in parasitoid contests. Behav Ecol 20:296–304
Bergman M, Olofsson M, Wiklund C (2010) Contest outcome in a territorial butterfly: the role of motivation. Proc R Soc B 277:3027–3033
Bolker B, R Development Core Team (2014) bbmle: tools for general maximum likelihood estimation. R package version 1.0.17. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bbmle
Briffa M (2008) Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size? Anim Behav 75:1053–1062
Briffa M, Elwood RW (2001) Motivational change during shell fights in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Anim Behav 62:505–510
Brown WD, Smith AT, Moskalik B, Gabriel J (2006) Aggressive contests in house crickets: size, motivation and the information content of aggressive songs. Anim Behav 72:225–233
Conrad KF, Pritchard G (1992) An ecological classification of odonate mating systems: the relative influence of natural, inter and intra-sexual selection on males. Biol J Linn Soc 45:255–269
Contreras-Garduño J, Canales-Lazcano J, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2006) Wing pigmentation, immune ability, fat reserves and territorial status in males of the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. J Ethol 24:165–173
Decarvalho TN, Watson PJ, Field SA (2004) Costs increase as ritualized fighting progresses within and between phases in the sierra dome spider, Neriene litigiosa. Anim Behav 68:473–482
Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223
Enquist M, Leimar O (1987) Evolution of fighting behaviour: the effect of variation in resource value. J Theor Biol 127:187–205
Enquist M, Leimar O (1990) The evolution of fatal fighting. Anim Behav 39:1–9
Hack MA (1997) Assessment strategies in the contests of male crickets, Acheta domesticus (L.) Anim Behav 53:733–747
Hardy ICW, Briffa M (2013) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Humphries EL, Hebblethwaite AJ, Batchelor TP, Hardy ICW (2006) The importance of valuing resources: host weight and contender age as determinants of parasitoid wasp contest outcomes. Anim Behav 72:891–898
Johnsson JI, Forser A (2002) Residence duration influences the outcome of territorial conflicts in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:282–286
Junior RSL, Peixoto PEC (2013) Males of the dragonfly Diastatops obscura fight according to predictions from game theory models. Anim Behav 85:663–669
Kemp DJ, Alcock J (2003) Lifetime resource utilization, flight physiology, and the evolution of contest competition in territorial insects. Am Nat 162:290–301
Killian KA, Allen JR (2008) Mating resets male cricket aggression. J Insect Behav 21:535–548
Koskimäki J, Rantala MJ, Taskinen J, Tynkkynen K, Suhonen J (2004) Immunocompetence and resource holding potential in the damselfly, Calopteryx virgo L. Behav Ecol 15:169–173
Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15:259–263
Lailvaux SP, Irschick DJ (2006) A functional perspective on sexual selection: insights and future prospects. Anim Behav 72:263–273
Lindström K, Pampoulie C (2005) Effects of resource holding potential and resource value on tenure at nest sites in sand gobies. Behav Ecol 16:70–74
López P, Martín J (2001) Fighting rules and rival recognition reduce costs of aggression in male lizards, Podarcis hispanica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:111–116
Marden JH, Cobb JR (2004) Territorial and mating success of dragonflies that vary in muscle power output and presence of gregarine gut parasites. Anim Behav 68:857–865
Marden JH, Waage JK (1990) Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim Behav 30:954–959
Mourão MAN, Peixoto PEC (2014) Do morphological and physiological characteristics of males of the dragonfly Macrothemis imitans determine the winner of territorial contests? J Insect Sci 14:89
O'Connor CM, Reddon AR, Ligocki IY, Hellman JK, Garvy KA, Marsh-Rollo SE, Hamilton IM, Balshine S (2015) Motivation but not body size influences territorial contest dynamics in a wild cichlid fish. Anim Behav 107:19–29
Palaoro AV, Briffa M (2017) Weaponry and defenses in fighting animals: how allometry can alter the predictions from contest theory. Behav Ecol 28:328–336
Palaoro AV, Dalostro MM, Costa JR, Santos S (2014) Freshwater decapod (Aegla longirostri) uses a mixed assessment strategy to resolve contests. Anim Behav 95:71–79
Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243
Parker GA, Rubenstein DI (1981) Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Anim Behav 29:221–240
Peixoto PEC, Benson WW (2008) Body mass and not wing length predicts territorial success in a tropical satyrine butterfly. Ethology 114:1069–1077
Peixoto PEC, Benson WW (2011) Fat and body mass predict residency status in two tropical satyrine butterflies. Ethology 117:722–730
Peixoto PEC, Benson WW (2012) Influence of previous residency and body mass in the territorial contests of the butterfly Hermeuptychia fallax (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae). J Ethol 30:61–68
Plaistow SJ, Siva-Jothy MT (1999) The ontogenetic switch between odonate life history stages: effects on fitness when time and food are limited. Anim Behav 58:659–667
R Core Team (2014) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/
Rodrígues-Muñoz R, Bretman A, Tregenza T (2011) Guarding males protect females from predation in a wild insect. Curr Biol 21:1716–1719
Schielzeth H (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecology Evol 1:103–113
Stockermans BC, Hardy ICW (2013) Subjective and objective components of resource value additively increase aggression in parasitoid contests. Biol Lett 9:20130391
Suhonen J, Rantala MJ, Honkavaara J (2008) Territoriality in odonates. In: Córdoba-Aguilar A (ed) Dragonflies and damselflies: model organisms for ecological and evolutionary research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 203–218
Switzer PV (1997a) Factors affecting site fidelity in a territorial animal, Perithemis tenera. Anim Behav 53:865–877
Switzer PV (1997b) Past reproductive success affects future habitat selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:307–312
Takeuchi T (2006) Matter of size or matter of residency experience? Territorial contest in a green hairstreak, Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ethology 112:293–299
Takeuchi T, Honda K (2009) Early comers become owners: effect of residency experience on territorial contest dynamics in a lycaenid butterfly. Ethology 115:767–773
Taylor PW, Elwood RW (2003) The mismeasure of animal contests. Anim Behav 65:1195–1202
Tsai Y-JJ, Barrows EM, Weiss MR (2014) Why do larger and older males win contests in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis? Anim Behav 91:151–159
Vande Velde L, Van Dyck H (2013) Lipid economy, flight activity and reproductive behaviour in the speckled wood butterfly: on the energetic cost of territory holding. Oikos 122:555–562
Vieira MC, Peixoto PEC (2013) Winners and losers: a meta-analysis of functional determinants of fighting ability in arthropod contests. Funct Ecol 27:305–313
Waage JK (1988) Confusion over residency and the escalation of damselfly territorial disputes. Anim Behav 36:586–595
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
We thank José Enéas Schramm Júnior, Gabriela Oliveira, Alane Oliveira, Viviana Barboni, Lorena Andrade, Kailane Gonçalves, and Tarcisio Bastos for their help in fieldwork and the staff of Sempre-Viva Municipal Reserve for logistical support. PECP has research grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq-PELD: 403774/2012-8; CNPq produtividade em pesquisa: 305561/2014-6) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (Fapesb: JCB0034/2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by S. Sakaluk
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
dos Santos, T.B., Peixoto, P.E. Agonistic interactions in the dragonfly Micrathyria ungulata: does male fighting investment come from an innate ability or an indomitable will?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2335-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2335-z