Skip to main content
Log in

The deimatic reaction in the praying mantis Stagmatoptera biocellata

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

When the mantid Stagmatoptera biocellata is shown a foe, the insect displays a characteristic response called the deimatic reaction (DR) (Fig. 1). A systematic study of the response is presented in this paper. 1. The full display is an assembly of seven independent and very stereotyped components. The lesser the strength of the reaction, the smaller the number of components. They disappear in a stereotyped order. 2. The occurrence of the DR proved to be highly predictable using birds as releasers (i.e. troupials, shiny cow-birds, Java sparrow and canarys). But the DR was also induced by the back projection of real or filmed shiny cow-birds silhouettes. Only a film taken and projected at 100 frames a second induced a DR as a “real” stimulus. 3. A DR is immediately induced by a bird presented for 2 minutes. The response duration exceedes the presentation interval. The leftover time ranged from few seconds to 45 minutes. When the insect and the predator were faced for long time, the DR was displayed as long as the stimulus was shown and a response that lasted 6 hours was recorded. Some conclusions were deduced from testing crude interferences in the nervous system (Fig. 3). Namely, that the DR can be elicited either by visual and tactile stimuli, and that the movements involved in the display are not coordinated with each other in a closed-circuit system. This finding is discussed in connection with an hypothesis put forward by Vowles (1961). 4. The survival value of the DR is analyzed and the paper concludes, unlike previous reports, that the over-all effect of the display is to frighten the foe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.: Notes on the floral simulation of Gongylus gongylodes Lin. P. Asiat. Soc. Bengal. 1877, 193–195 (1877).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros Pita, J. C., Maldonado, H.: A fovea in the praying mantis eye II. Some morphological characteristics. Z. vergl. Physiol. 67, 79–92 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, G. D. H.: Experiments on the relative edibility of insects, with special reference to coloration. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1921, 1–105 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, J.: A comparative study of innate defensive behaviour in Trinidad mantids (Orthoptera, Mantoidea). Zoologica 37, 259–293 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goureau, P.: Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. 10, (1841).

  • Heinz, H.: Vergleichende Beobachtungen über die Putzhandlung bei Dipteren im allgemeinen und bei Sarcophaga. Z. Tierpsychol. 6, 330–371 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingstow, R. G. W.: Animal colours and adornment. London 1933.

  • Huber, F.: Sitz und Bedeutung nervöser Zentren für Instinkthandlungen bei Männchen der Gryllus campestris. Z. Tierpsychol. 12, 12–48 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L., Maldonado, H.: A fovea in the praying mantis eye. III. The centring of the prey. Z. vergl. Physiol. 6, 93–101 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado, H., Barros Pita, J. C.: Hit distance and the predatory strike of the praying mantis. Z. vergl. Physiol. 56, 237–257 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: A fovea in the praying mantis eye. I. Estimation Barros Pita, J. C.: of the catching distance. Z. vergl. Physiol. 67, 58–78 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Levin, L.: Distance estimation and the monocular cleaning reflex in praying mantis. Z. vergl. Physiol. 56, 258–267 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, H.: Regelung und Steurung bei der Orientierung der Lebewesen. Regelungstechnik 10, 226–232 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Prey capture in mantids. Recent advances in invertebrate physiology, p. 51–71. Oregon: University of Oregon Publ. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilling, S., Mittelstaedt, H., Roeder, K. D.: Prey recognition in the praying mantis. Behaviour 14, 164–184 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roonwal, M. L.: The frightening attitude of a desert mantid Eremiaphila braueri Kr. (Orthoptera, Mantodea). Proc. roy. ent. Soc. Lond. (a), 13, 71–72 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, D.: The modification and attitude of Idolum diabolicum, a mantis of the kind called floral simulators. Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. 10, 175–180 (1899).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stäger, P.: Matis religiosa L. als Musikerin. Z. wiss. Insekt. Biol.23, 162–164 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley, G. C.: Frightening attitudes and floral simulation in praying mantids. Proc. roy. ent. Soc. Lond. 14, 91–96 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vowles, D. M.: Neural mechanism in insect behaviour. Current problems in animal behaviour, p. 5–29 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, A.: Insect tropisms. Canad. Ent. 50, 357–360 (1918).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. E.: Notes on the life history of Gongylus gongylodes, a mantis of the tribe Empusides, and a floral simulator. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1904, 125–137 (1904).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Mason, J.: On the presence of a stridulation apparatus in certain Mantidae. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1878, 263–269 (1878).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is deeply indebted to Dr. John Engelhardt for reading the manuscript; to Mr. J. Machin and Mr. M. Rodriguez for drawing the figures and to Miss Arlette Dupré for her secretarial work. Mr. R. Pingarrón's help with photographs is also acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maldonado, H. The deimatic reaction in the praying mantis Stagmatoptera biocellata . Z. Vergl. Physiol. 68, 60–71 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297812

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297812

Keywords

Navigation