Abstract
Parental modeling and reinforcement antecedents of masculine, feminine, androgynous, and undifferentiated sex-role orientation were tested for 228 college men and women using self and parent versions of the Bem Sex Role Inventory and the Parent Behavior Form. Parent scale differences indicated that psychological androgyny is associated with high levels of masculinity and femininity in both parents, with high levels of warmth and involvement, particularly with the same-sex parent, and, in females, with maternal cognitive/achievement encouragement. Sex typing occurred where both parents modeled traditional sex-role attributes and, for females, with extreme closeness with father in the absence of maternal cognitive/intellectual encouragement. An undifferentiated sex-role orientation was associated with low emotional and cognitive involvement with father in males and with an undifferentiated but emotionally involved mother in females. Finally, cross-sex typing in both sexes was associated with parental rejection, low feminity in both parents, and an absence of warmth or cognitive encouragement from either parent. These findings confirm and expand those of an earlier study for androgynous subjects, but differ markedly for cross-sex-typed subjects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A., & Huston, A. C. Identification as a process of incidental learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 63, 311–318.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. A comparative test of the status envy social power, and secondary reinforcement theories of identificatory learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 527–534.
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–643.
Constantinople, A. Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 389–407.
Heilbrun, A. B. Parent identification and filial sex-role behavior: The importance of biological context. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press, 1973.
Heilbrun, A. B. Identification with the father and sex role development of the daughter. The Family Coordinator, 1976, 25, 411–416.
Kelly, J. A. Parent behavior, personality and cheating. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1975.
Kelly, J. A., & Worell, L. Parent behaviors related to masculine, feminine, and androgynous sex role orientations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 843–851.
Lynn, D. B. Fathers and sex role development. The Family Coordinator, 1976, 25, 403–409.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.
Orlofsky, J. L., & Windle, M. T. Sex-role orientation, behavioral adaptability, and personal adjustment. Sex Roles, 1978; 4, 801–811.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orlofsky, J.L. Parental antecedents of sex-role orientation in college men and women. Sex Roles 5, 495–512 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287324
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287324