Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative greenhouse study of Eucalyptus grandis in vitro plantlets and half-sib seedlings, II. Dry matter accumulation and relative distribution

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vitro directly micropropagated plantlets from three selected five-year-old Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex. Maiden hybrids were compared to their related half-sib seedlings for growth and growth pattern parameters under greenhouse conditions used for operational seedling production. The oven dry weights were determined from stem, leaf, and root samples collected every 40 days for four times. Relative growth rate, net assimilation rates and shoot:root ratio were calculated. Survival was 98% and 95% for plantlets and seedlings, respectively. Significant differences were observed between parents in terms of shoot and root dry weights and their ratios with similar ranking among plantlets and seedlings, suggesting genetic control over these traits. Plantlets started with significantly higher root: shoot ratios and stem, leaf, root, and total dry weight. Although seedlings had higher relative growth and net assimilation rates, all the initial differences decreased sharply over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett IJ, Wroth CM, Davison EM, McComb JA (1986) For Ecol Manage 14:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Boote KJ (1977) Proc Soil Crop Sci Soc Florida 36:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Brando LG (1984) In: Marcus Wallenberg Foundation Symposia Proceedings, Falun, Sweden, pp 3–15

  • Cannell MGR (1985) In: Cannell MGR, Jackson JE (ed) Attributes of Trees as Crop Plants, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, pp 160–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans LT (1975) In: Evans LT (ed), Crop Physiology, London, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp 327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuspe SS, Gupta PK, Kulkarni DK, Mehta U, Mascarenhas AF (1987) Can J For 1361–1363

  • Leach GN (1979) Tappi 62:59–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt J (1980) In: Physiological Ecology, Vol 2, Water, Radiation, Salt, and Other Stresses, New York, Academic Press, pp 93–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas AF, Khuspe SS, Nudgauda RS, Gupta PK, Khan, BM (1988) In: Hanover JW, Keathley DE (ed), Genetic Manipulation of Woody Plants, New York, Plenum Press, pp 391–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckeand SE, Allen HL (1984) Physiol. Plant 61:523–528

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeand SE, Wisniewski LA (1982) In: Thielges BA (ed), Proc North Am For Biol Workshop, 7th, pp 214–219

  • Meskimen GF, Rockwood DL, Reddy, KV (1987) New Forests 3:197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA, Ferrar PJ, Slatyer RO (1978) Oecologia 6:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS User Guide: Statistics (1985) Version 5 Ed, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina

  • Shepherd KR, Sa-ardavut P (1984) Aust For Res 14:265–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buiijtenen JP (1979) In: Hollis CA, Squillace AE (ed), Proc North Am For Biol Workshop, 5th, pp 235–241

  • Venus JC, Causton DR (1979) Ann Bot 43:633–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrag EI (1989) Ph.D. disser, Univ Florida, 147 pp

  • Warrag EI, Lesney MS, Rockwood DL (1990) Plant Cell Rep (this vol)

  • Zimmer WJ, Grose RJ (1958) Aust For 22:13–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. M. Widholm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warrag, E.I., Lesney, M.S. & Rockwood, D.L. Comparative greenhouse study of Eucalyptus grandis in vitro plantlets and half-sib seedlings, II. Dry matter accumulation and relative distribution. Plant Cell Reports 8, 500–503 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269059

Keywords

Navigation