Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of developmental stages in the coexistence of three species of Mononchoidea (Nematoda) in a pasture soil

  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Populations of each developmental stage of three mononchid species (Clarkus, Cobbonchus, Iotonchus) under grazed pasture were estimated in the presence and absence of the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa. All stages of all species had signs of prey in their gut. Introduction of earthworms changed the abundance of the species from 158000, 84000 and 2400/m2 to 43 000, 5000 and 41300/m2, but total biomass remained relatively unchanged at 288000 μg/m2. The larger Iotonchus was more abundant in the soil with earthworms and improved texture. The length ratios between the stages of the three species are 1.225, 1.235 and 1.395, with the overall mean of 1.285 close to the value for the Dyar-Hutchinson rule. Other analyses of population separation are made. Given the unequal abundance of the various stages, the species successfully coexist and exploit a wide resource. Predation by such nematodes on bacterial-feeding nematodes may influence bacterial grazing and thus nutrient cycling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alphey TJW (1985) A study of spatial distribution and population dynamics of two sympatric species of trichorid nematodes. Ann Appl Biol 107:497–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RV, Kirchner TB (1982) A simulation model for lifehistory strategies of bacteriophagic nematodes. In: Freckman DW (ed) Nematodes in soil ecosystem. University of Texas, Austin, pp 157–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman SJ, Gray TRG (1986) Importance of cryptic growth, yield factors and maintenance energy in models of microbial growth in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 18:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen FB, Fenchel TM (1977) Theories of populations in biological communities. Ecol Stud 20:1–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner JW (1980) Two metaphors of the niche. Synthese 43:123–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines AH (1982) Coexistence in a kelp forest: size, population dynamics, and resource partitioning in a guild of spider crabs (Brachyura, Majidae). Ecol Monogr 52:179–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogue EW (1982) Sediment disturbance and the spatial distribution of shallow water meiobenthic nematodes. J Mar Res 40:551–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Holter P (1982) Resource utilization and local coexistence in a guild of scarabaeid dung beetles (Aphodius spp.). Oikos 39:213–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper DJ, Cowland JA (1986) Fungal hosts for the chrysanthemum nematode, Aphelenchoides ritzemabosi. Plant Pathol 35:128–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KE (1985) Earthworms: their ecology and relationships with soils and land use. Academic Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen H, O'Neill RV, Gardner RH (1985) Use of an ecosystem model for testing ecosystem responses to inaccuracies of root and microflora productivity estimates. Br Ecol Soc [Special Publ] 4:233–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1984) Age structure component of niche width and intraspecific resource partitioning: can age groups function as ecological species? Am Nat 123:541–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small RW (1987) A review of the prey of predatory soil nematodes. Pedobiologia 30:179–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdill SMJ (1982) Effects of introduced earthworms on the productivity of New Zealand pastures. Pedobiologia 24:29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JD (1983) Organic matter turnover by earthworms. In: Satchell JE (ed) Earthworm ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki N (1985) Habitat selection of three chrysomelid species associated with Rumex spp. Oecologia 66:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates GW (1968) An analysis of annual variation of the nematode fauna in dune sand, at Himatangi Beach, New Zealand. Pedobiologia 8:173–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates GW (1973) Nematoda of a Danish beech forest. II Production estimates. Oikos 24:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates GW (1981) Soil nematode populations depressed in the presence of earthworms. Pedobiologia 22:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates GW (1984a) Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus (Nematoda: Tylenchida) populations changes under pasture during thirty-six months. Pedobiologia 27:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates GW (1984b) Variation in soil nematode diversity under pasture with soil and year. Soil Biol Biochem 16:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates GW (1987) Nematode feeding and activity: The importance of developmental stages. Biol Fertil Soils 3:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Zullini A, Peretti E (1986) Lead pollution and moss-inhabiting nematodes of an industrial area. Water Soil Air Pollut 27:403–410

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeates, G.W. Significance of developmental stages in the coexistence of three species of Mononchoidea (Nematoda) in a pasture soil. Biol Fert Soils 5, 225–229 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256905

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256905

Key words

Navigation