Skip to main content
Log in

Visual field deficits in cats reared with cyclodeviations of the eyes

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Visual fields of ten cats which had one or both eyes rotated at 8 days of age were measured by two forms of perimetry and compared to visual fields of two normal cats and of four cats with monocular rotations at 16 days, 3 months or 6 months of age. All animals showed excellent localization of visual stimuli and responded to the actual location of stimuli in space rather than to the retinal locus normally associated with that location. In cats with monocular rotations, the field of the normal eye was always normal, extending from 90 ° ipsilateral to 30 ° contralateral. Cats with rotations of one eye at 3 or 6 months of age had essentially normal fields in the rotated eye as well, while cats with surgery at 8 or 16 days had restricted horizontal fields. They responded only to stimuli in the ipsilateral hemifield; they were blind in the contralateral hemifield. Their superior and inferior visual fields were normal. The field deficits related consistently to visual field coordinates and not to the angle or direction of rotation. In cats with binocular rotations the visual field of at least one eye extended across the midline. Thus, the extent of the field depended upon sensorimotor experiences of the cat both before and after surgery. It is argued that these monocular field deficits have a central origin, not a retinal one.

When tested with both eyes open, seven of 14 experimental animals did not respond throughout the visual field seen by each eye alone. The total visual field with both eyes open was less than the sum of the two monocular fields; greatest losses were most pronounced in the extreme periphery of the field ipsilateral to the rotated eye. Since changes in eye position (e.g., convergence during bincocular viewing) were not observed, it is suggested that the binocular losses indicate suppression of the deviated eye which has a central origin.

All animals were tested for visual following, visually-triggered extension (placing), and visually-guided reaching. Cats which had been routinely encouraged to use the rotated eye(s) by occlusion of the other eye showed skilful performance within a few weeks after surgery as previously reported by Peck and Crewther (1975), Mitchell et al. (1976) and others. In contrast, two cats reared with both eyes open after unilateral rotation in infancy were profoundly handicapped, as previously reported by Yinon (1975, 1976).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blakemore C, Van Sluyters RC, Peck CK, Hein A (1975) Development of cat visual cortex following rotation of one eye. Nature 257: 584–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewther SG, Crewther DP, Peck CK (1977) Maintained binocularity in kittens raised with both eyes open. ARVO (Abstracts) p 269

  • Crewther SG, Crewther DP, Peck CK, Pettigrew JD (1980) The visual cortical effects of rearing cats with monocular or binocular cyclotorsion. J Neurophysiol 44: 97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke-Elder S, Wybar K (1973) Ocular motility and strabismus. System of ophthalmology, vol VI. Kimpton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elberger AJ (1979) The role of the corpus callosum in the development of interocular eye alignment and the organization of the visual field in the cat. Exp Brain Res 36: 71–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon B, Moran J, Presson J (1979a) Visual fields of cats reared with one eye rotated. Brain Res 174: 167–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon B, Moran J, Presson J (1979b) Visual field deficits in cats with one eye rotated. Abstr Soc Neurosci 5: 626

    Google Scholar 

  • Granit R (1977) The purposive brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 36–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecaen H, Alberg ML (1978) Human neuropsychology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein A, Held R (1967) Dissociation of visual placing into elicited and guided components. Science 158: 390–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitländer H, Hoffman KP (1978) The visual field of monocularly deprived cats after late closure or enucleation of the nondeprived eye. Brain Res 145: 153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1970) The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol (Lond) 206: 419–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes A (1976) A supplement to the cat schematic eye. Vision Res 16: 149–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda H, Jacobson SG (1977) Nasal field loss in cats reared with convergent squint. Behavioural studies. J Physiol (Lond) 270: 367–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson SG, Ikeda H (1979) Behavioural studies of spatial vision in cats reared with convergent squint. Is amblyopia due to arrest of development? Exp Brain Res 34: 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalil R (1978) Dark rearing in the cat. Effects on visuomotor behavior and cell growth in the lateral geniculate nucleus. J Comp Neurol 178: 451–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DE, Giffin F, Muir D, Blakemore C, Van Sluyters RC (1976) Behavioral compensation of cats after early rotation of one eye. Exp Brain Res 25: 109–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DM, Griffin F, Wilkinson F, Anderson P, Smith ML (1976) Visual resolution in young kittens. Vision Res 16: 363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson C, Freeman RD (1978) Eye alignment in cats. Nature 271: 446–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Orem J, Schlag-Rey M, Schlag J (1973) Unilateral visual neglect and thalamic intralaminar lesions in the cat. Exp Neurol 40: 784–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck CK, Crewther SG (1975) Perceptual effects of surgical rotation of the eye in kittens. Brain Res 99: 213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck CK, Crewther SG, Barber G, Johannsen CJ (1979) Pattern discrimination and visuomotor behavior following rotation of one or both eyes in kittens and in adult cats. Exp Brain Res 34: 401–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck CK, Schlag-Rey M, Schlag J (1980) Visuo-oculomotor properties of cells in the superior colliculus of the alert cat. J Comp Neurol (in press)

  • Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M (1977) Visuomotor properties of cells in cat thalamic internal medullary lamina. In: Baker R, Berthoz A (eds) Control of gaze by brain stem neurons. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, pp 453–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M, Peck CK, Joseph JP (1980) Thalamic neurons detecting the position of visual targets in space. Exp Brain Res (in press)

  • Sherman SM (1972) Development of interocular alignment in cats. Brain Res 37: 187–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SM (1973) Visual field defects in monocularly and binocularly deprived cats. Brain Res 49: 25–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SM (1974) Permanence of visual perimetry defects in monocularly and binocularly deprived cats. Brain Res 73: 491–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SM (1977a) The effect of superior colliculus lesions upon the visual fields of cats with cortical ablations. J Comp Neurol 172: 211–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SM (1977b) The effect of cortical and tectal lesions on the visual fields of binocularly deprived cats. J Comp Neurol 172: 231–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SM, Sprague JM (1979) Effects of visual cortex lesions upon the visual fields of monocularly deprived cats. J Comp Neurol 188: 291–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Simoni A, Sprague JM (1976) Parimetric analysis of binocular and monocular visual fields in Siamese cats. Brain Res 111: 189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry RW (1943) Effect of 180 degree rotation of the retinal field on visuomotor coordination. J Exp Zool 92: 263–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague JM, Levy J, DiBernardino A, Berlucchi G (1978) Visual cortical areas mediating from discrimination in the cat. J Comp Neurol 172: 441–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague JM, Meikle TH Jr (1965) The role of the superior colliculus in visually guided behavior. Exp Neurol 11: 115–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Timney B, Peck CK (1979) Visual acuity in cats following surgical rotation of one or both eyes. Abstr Soc Neurosci 5: 811

    Google Scholar 

  • Timney B, Peck CK (in prep.) Visual acuity in cats following surgical rotation of one or both eyes

  • Toga AW, Layton BS, Horenstein S (1979) Visually directed behavior is influenced by the posterior ectosylvain gyrus in the cat. Brain Res 178: 606–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumosa N, Tieman SB, Hirsch HVB (1980) Unequal alternating monocular deprivation causes asymmetric visual fields in cats. Science 208: 421–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusa RJ, Palmer LA, Rosenquist AC (1978) Retinotopic organization of area 17 (striate cortex) in the cat. J Comp Neurol 177: 213–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hof-Van Duin J (1976) Development of visuomotor behavior in normal and dark-reared cats. Brain Res 104: 233–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hof-Van Duin J (1977) Visual field measurements in monocularly deprived and normal cats. Exp Brain Res 30: 353–368

    Google Scholar 

  • van Grunau MW (1979) The role of maturation and visual experience in the development of eye alignment in cats. Exp Brain Res 37: 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson FE (1980) Reversal of the behavioral effects of monocular deprivation as a function of age in the kitten. Behav Brain Res 1: 101–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinon U (1975) Eye rotation in developing kittens: the effect on ocular dominance and receptive field organization of cortical cells. Exp Brain Res 34: 215–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinon U (1976) Eye rotation surgically induced in cats modifies properties of cortical neurons. Exp Neurol 51: 603–627

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by Grant NS 14116 from the US Public Health Service

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peck, C.K., Barber, G., Pilsecker, C.E. et al. Visual field deficits in cats reared with cyclodeviations of the eyes. Exp Brain Res 41, 61–74 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236680

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236680

Key words

Navigation