Skip to main content
Log in

Histological comparison of single somatic embryos of maize from suspension culture with somatic embryos attached to callus cells

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An embryogenic suspension culture of Zea mays, genotype 4C1, was obtained from friable callus that was cultured on solid medium and had been obtained from zygotic embryos. The suspension contained non-dividing elongated cells, clusters of dividing isodiametric cells, and globular, ovoid, and polar stages of somatic embryos. The single somatic embryos were blocked in shoot meristem formation: when transferred to regeneration medium they developed a root and, at the shoot side, a green cap with meristematic cells, but a scutellum and leaf primordia were not formed. In medium containing 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, somatic embryos formed embryogenic callus aggregates, consisting of globular stage somatic embryos attached to each other via undifferentiated callus cells. These somatic embryos developed into mature embryos with the zygotic histological characteristics, such as scutellum and leaf primordia, in maturation medium, and then regenerated into plants in regeneration medium. By omitting the maturation phase, regeneration occurred via organogenesis. Polyembryos, i. e. embryos attached to each other without callus tissue in between, behaved as single somatic embryos. It is concluded that the attached callus tissue provides a factor that stimulates scutellum and leaf primordia formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CMM:

callus maintenance medium

2,4D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid

PCV:

packed cell volume

MS:

Murashige and Skoog medium

References

  • Conger BV, Havanesian JC, Trigiano RN, Gray DJ (1989) Cro Sci. 29: 448–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu C, Yin KC, Chu CY, Bi FY (1975) Sci. Sin. 18: 659–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransz PF, Schel JHN (1991) Can J. Bot. 69: 26–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Mórocz S, Donn G, Nemeth J, Dudits D (1990) Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 721–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Mórocz S, Dudits D, Nemeth J (1986) In: Somers DA, Gegenbach BG, Biesboer DD, Hackett WP, Green CE (eds) VI Int. Congr. Plant Tissue and Cell Culturere Minneapolis. p. 190

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Prioli L, Sondahl MR (1989) Biotechnology 7: 589–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes CA, Lowe KS, Ruby KL (1988) Biotechnology 6: 56–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Schel JHN, Kieft H, Van Lammeren AAM (1984) Can. J. Bot 62: 2842–2853

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan WF (1988) Ann. Rev. Genet. 22: 353–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Shillito RD, Carswell GK, Johnson CM, DiMaio JJ, Harms CT (1989) Biotechnology 7: 581–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lammeren AAM (1988) Acta Bot. Neerl. 37: 49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil IK (1988) Biotechnology 6: 397–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Vasil IK (1986). J. Plant Physiol. 124: 399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Walthall ED, Brady T (1986) Cell Differentiation 18: 37–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. Lörz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emons, A.M.C., Kieft, H. Histological comparison of single somatic embryos of maize from suspension culture with somatic embryos attached to callus cells. Plant Cell Reports 10, 485–488 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234578

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234578

Keywords

Navigation