Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana: comparison of the efficiencies with various organs, plant ecotypes and Agrobacterium strains

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana was compared with different organs, Arabidopsis ecotypes, and Agrobacterium strains. Efficiency of shoot regeneration was examined using hypocotyl, cotyledon and root explants prepared from young seedlings. Hypocotyl expiants had the highest regeneration efficiency in all of the four Arabidopsis ecotypes tested, when based on a tissue culture system of callus-inducing medium (CIM: Valvekens et al. 1988) and shoot-inducing medium (SIM: Feldmann and Marks 1986). Histochemical analysis using the ß-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene showed that the gusA gene expression increased as the period of preincubation on CIM was extended, suggesting that dividing cells are susceptible to Agrobacterium infection. In order to obtain transgenic shoots, hypocotyl explants preincubated for 7 or 8 days on CIM were infected with Agrobacterium containing a binary vector which carries two drug-resistant genes as selection markers, and transferred to SIM for selection of transformed shoots. Of four Arabidopsis ecotypes and of three Agrobacterium strains examined, Wassilewskija ecotype and EHA101 strain showed the highest efficiency of regeneration of transformed shoots. By combining the most efficient factors of preincubation period, Arabidopsis ecotype, tissue, and bacterial strain, we obtained a transformation efficiency of about 80–90%. Southern analysis of 124 transgenic plants showed that 44% had one copy of inserted T-DNA while the others had more than one copy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AIM:

Agrobacterium infection medium

CIM:

callus-inducing medium

CTAB:

cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid

GUS:

ß-glucuronidase

hph:

hygromycin phosphotransferase

IAA:

indole-3-acetic acid

IBA:

indole-3-butyric acid

2ip:

N -(2-isopentenyl) adenine

NPTII:

neomycin phosphotransferase II

RIM:

root-inducing medium

35S:

cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter

SIM:

shoot-inducing medium

References

  • Akama K and Tanifuji S (1990) Plant Mol. Biol. 15:337–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang S-S, Park S-K, Nam H-G (1990) In: Abstract of the Fourth International Conference on Arabidopsis Research, Vienna, pp28

  • Christianson ML, Warnick DA (1983) Dev. Biol. 95:288–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke MC, Wei W, Lindsey K (1992) Plant Mol.Biol.Rep. 10:178–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Focus 12:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Estelle MA, Somerville CR (1986) Trends in Genetics 2:89–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann KA, Marks MD (1986) Plant Sci. 47:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann KA, Marks MD (1987) Mol. Gen. Genet. 208:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Exp. Cell Res. 50:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekema A, Hirsch P, Hooykaas P, Schilperoort R (1983) Nature 303:179–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hood EE, Helmer GL, Fraley RT, Chilton, M-D (1986) J.Bacteriol. 168:1291–1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA (1987) Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5:387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan M (1987) EMBO J. 6:3901–3907

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd AM, Barnason AR, Rogers SG, Byrne MC, Fraley RT, Horsch RB (1986) Science 234:464–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Márton L, Browse J (1991) Plant Cell Rep. 10:235–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerowitz EM, Pruitt RE (1985) Science 229:1214–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney MM, Walker JM, Sharma K (1989) Plant Cell Rep. 8:238–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol. Plant 15:473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta S, Mita S, Hattori T, Nakamura K (1990) Plant Cell Physiol. 31:805–813

    Google Scholar 

  • Rédei GP, Koncz C, Schell J (1988) In: Gustafson JP, Appols R (eds) Chromosome structure and function. Plenum Press, New York, pp 175–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangwan RS, Bourgeois Y, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1991) Mol. Gen. Gent. 230:475–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R, Willmitzer L (1988) Plant Cell Rep. 7:583–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern EM (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 98:503–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Valvekens D, Van Montagu M, Van Lijsebettens M (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5536–5540

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Haute E, Joos H, Maes S, Warren G, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1983) EMBO J. 2:411–418

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. M. Widholm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akama, K., Shiraishi, H., Ohta, S. et al. Efficient transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana: comparison of the efficiencies with various organs, plant ecotypes and Agrobacterium strains. Plant Cell Reports 12, 7–11 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232413

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232413

Key words

Navigation