Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assessed the reach to grasp movement and its adaptive response to a perturbation of object size. In blocked trials, subjects (n = 12) were instructed to reach 35 cm to grasp and lift a small- (0.7 cm) or large-diameter (8 cm) cylinder. Under an unconstrained condition (condition 1), no instructions as to the type of grasp to adopt were given. Subjects thus naturally used a precision grip (PG) for the small cylinder and whole hand prehension (WHP) for the large cylinder. Under condition 2, subjects were instructed to utilize a PG for grasps of both the large and small cylinders. For condition 3, the instruction was to use WHP irrespective of object size. Kinematic organization was determined with analysis of the recordings of active markers placed on the wrist, thumb, and three fingers. For condition 1 the results showed a temporal arrangement of both components (transport and manipulation) which differed from that of conditions 2 and 3. In perturbed trials, illumination shifted from the small to large cylinder or vice versa. With condition 1, subjects automatically switched from one grasp to another with no or little increase of movement duration. This was generally achieved by an earlier temporal setting of peak wrist deceleration. For conditions 2 and 3, where a change of aperture was required, movement duration was prolonged without adaptation of earlier transport component parameters. It is concluded that the adaptive responses to a change of distal patterning also affect the organization of the proximal component. Assessment of grasps constrained by instructions may lead to interpretations of central control of the reach to grasp movement which differ from those obtained by assessing more natural prehensile patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alstermarck B, Lundberg A, Norrsell U, Sybirska E (1981) Integration in descending motor pathways controlling the forelimb in the cat. 9. Differential behavioural defects after spinal cord lesions interrupting defined pathways from higher centres to motoneurones. Exp Brain Res 42:299–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arbib MA (1985) Schemas for the temporal control of behavior. Hum Neurobiol 4:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman J, Kuypers HGJM (1973) Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the splitbrain rhesus monkey. Brain 96:653–674

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz B, Armstrong TJ (1992) A kinematic model of the human hand to evaluate its prehensile capabilities. J Biomech 25:149–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Jeannerod M (1991) Measuring time to awareness. Neuroreport 2:797–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M (1991) Temporal dissociation of motor responses and subjective awareness: a study in normal subjects. Brain 114:2639–2655

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Bennett KMB, Paulignan Y (1992) Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching? Behav Brain Res 50:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebatch JG, Gandevia SC (1989) The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. Brain 112:749–763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craik KJW (1948) Theory of the human operator in control systems: II. Man as an element in a control system. Br J Psychol 38:142–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutkosky MR, Wright PK (1986) Friction, stability and the design of robotic fingers. Int J Robot Res 5:20–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Evarts EV, Tanji J (1976) Reflex and intended responses in motor cortex pyramidal tract neurons of monkey. J Neurophysiol 39:1069–1080

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM, Peterson JR (1964) Information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol 67:103–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Castiello U, Corradini ML, Scarpa M, Umiltá C, Rizzolatti G (1991) Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 29:361–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Scarpa M, Castiello U (1992) Temporal coupling between transport and manipulation components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation. Behav Brain Res 47:71–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991) Integration of sensory information during the programming of PG: comments on the contributions of size cues. Exp Brain Res 85:226–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P (1991) Task coordination in human prehension. J Mot Behav 23:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Wing AM (1991) Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension. Neurosci Lett 122:103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry FM, Harrison JS (1961) Refractoriness of a fast movement. Percept Mot Skills 13:351–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Iberall T, Lyons D (1984) Towards perceptual robotics. Proceedings of the 1984 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Halifax, Nova Scotia, October, pp 147–157

  • Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting tasks with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS, Holt KG, Kugler PN, Turvey MT (1980) On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures. I. Empirical lines of convergence. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 49–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee RG, Tatton WG (1975) Motor responses to sudden limb displacements in primates with specific CNS lesions and in human patients with motor system disorders. Can J Neurol Sci 2:285–293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Bekey GA (1986) A generic grasp mode selection paradigm for robot hands on the basis of object geometric primitives. USC-IRIS Report No 218. Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California at Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C (1987) Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 41:365–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athenes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sci 9:149–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir RB (1985) Small hand muscles in precision grip: a corticospinal prerogative? Exp Brain Res [Suppl] 10:155–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir RB, Lemon RN (1983) Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip. Brain Res 261:312–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JT, Wong YC, Kwan AC (1985) Sequential activation of neurons in primate motor cortex during unrestrained forelimb movement. J Neurophysiol 53:435–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier JR (1956) The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 38:902–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Nashner L, Berthoz A (1978) Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control. Brain Res 150:403–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R (1991a) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size. Exp Brain Res 87:407–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M (1991b) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 83:502–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porter R, Lewis MM (1975) Relationship of neuronal discharges in the precentral gyrus of monkeys to the performance of arm movements. Brain Res 98:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67:455–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Camarda R, Fogassi L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M (1988) Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Exp Brain Res 71:491–507

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Day BL, Dick JPR, Kachi T, Cowan JMA, Marsden CD (1987) Motor cortex stimulation in intact man: I. General characteristics of EMG response in different muscles. Brain 110:1173–1190

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA (1969) Movement time as a determiner of timing accuracy. J Exp Psychol 79:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Terzuolo C (1980) Space-time invariance in learned motor skills. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 525–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LRT (1979) Movement time, movement extent and response complexity as determinants of programmed motor control. J Hum Mov Stud 5:189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise SP, Desimone R (1988) Behavioral neurophysiology: insights into seeing and grasping. Science 242:736–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelaznik HN, Schmidt RA, Gielen SCAM, Milich M (1983) Kinematic properties of rapid aimed hand movements. J Mot Behav 15:217–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelaznik HN, Slotta J, Rosenbaum DA (1989) A new theory for the linear speed accuracy trade-off in aimed hand movements. In: Worringham CJ (ed) Spatial, temporal and electromyographical variability in human motor control. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, p 18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Psicolgia, Universitá di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 5, I-40127, Bologna, Italy

    U. Castiello

  2. Dipartimento di Psicolgia Generale, Universitá di Padova, Padova, Italy

    K. M. B. Bennett

  3. Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science and Physical Education, Arizona State University, 85287-0404, Tempe, Arizona, USA

    G. E. Stelmach

Authors
  1. U. Castiello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. M. B. Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. E. Stelmach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castiello, U., Bennett, K.M.B. & Stelmach, G.E. Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size. Exp Brain Res 94, 163–178 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230479

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230479

Key words

Search

Navigation