Skip to main content
Log in

Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to determine the maximum joint stiffness that could be produced by cocontraction of wrist flexor and extensor muscles, experiments were conducted in which healthy human subjects stabilized a wrist manipulandum that was made mechanically unstable by using positive position feedback to create a load with the characteristics of a negative spring. To determine a subject's limit of stability, the negative stiffness of the manipulandum was increased by increments until the subject could no longer reliably stabilize the manipulandum in a 1° target window. Static wrist stiffness was measured by applying a 3° rampand-hold displacement of the manipulandum, which stretched the wrist flexor muscles. As the load stiffness was made more and more negative, subjects responded by increasing the level of cocontraction of flexor and extensor muscles to increase the stiffness of the wrist. The stiffness measured at a subject's limit of stability was taken as the maximum stiffness that the subject could achieve by cocontraction of wrist flexor and extensor muscles. In almost all cases, this value was as large or larger than that measured when the subject was asked to cocontract maximally to stiffen the wrist in the absence of any load. Static wrist stiffness was also measured when subjects reciprocally activated flexor or extensor muscles to hold the manipulandum in the target window against a load generated by a stretched spring. We found a strong linear correlation between wrist stiffness and flexor torque over the range of torques used in this study (20–80% maximal voluntary contraction). The maximum stiffness achieved by cocontraction of wrist flexor and extensor muscles was less than 50% of the maximum value predicted from the joint stiffness measured during matched reciprocal activation of flexor and extensor muscles. EMG recorded from either wrist flexor or extensor muscles during maximal cocontraction confirmed that this reduced stiffness was due to lower levels of activation during cocontraction of flexor and extensor muscles than during reciprocal contraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akazawa K, Milner TE, Stein RB (1983) Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. J Neurophysiol 49: 6–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera EJ de la, Milner TE (1994) The effects of skinfold thickness on the selectivity of surface EMG. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 93: 91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett DJ, Gorassini M, Prochazka A (1994) Catching a ball: contributions of intrinstic muscle stiffness, reflexes, and higher order responses. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 72: 525–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaday C, Forget R, Milner TE (1994) A re-examination of the effects of instruction on the long-latency stretch reflex response of the flexor pollicis longus muscle. Exp Brain Res 100: 515–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter RR, Crago PE, Gorman PH (1993) Nonlinear stretch reflex interaction during cocontraction. J Neurophysiol 69: 943–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Chequer RS, Goodin DS, Aminoff MJ, Maeztu C (1994) Late electromyographic activity following stretch in human forearm muscles: physiological role. Brain Res 641: 273–278

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca CJ, Mambrito B (1987) Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coordination and reciprocal activation. J Neurophysiol 58: 525–542

    Google Scholar 

  • De Serres SJ, Milner TE (1991) Wrist muscle activation patterns and stiffness associated with stable and unstable mechanical loads. Exp Brain Res 86: 451–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen CCAM. Houk JC (1984) Nonlinear viscosity of human wrist. J Neurophysiol 52: 553–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin DS, Aminoff MJ (1992) The basis and functional role of the late EMG activity in human forearm muscles following wrist displacement. Brain Res 589: 39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagbarth K-E, Wallin G, Löfstedt L (1975) Muscle spindle activity in man during voluntary fast alternating movements. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 38: 625–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Hébert LJ, De Serres SJ, Arsenault AB (1991) Cocontraction of the elbow muscles during combined tasks of pronation-flexion and supination-flexion. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 31: 483–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N (1984) Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles. IEEE Trans Autom Control 29: 681–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtz SJ (1964) Influence of gravitational forces on function of lower extremity muscles. J Appl Physiol 19: 999–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey DR, Reed DJ (1983) Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and coactivation of antagonist muscles. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. Raven, New York, pp 347–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter IW, Kearney RE (1982) Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with mean ankle torque. J Biomech 15: 747–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Iles JF, Pisini JV (1992) Cortical modulation of transmission in spinal reflex pathways of man. J Physiol (Lond) 455: 425–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger RJ, Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1982) Myoelectric responses at flexors and extensors of human wrist to step torque perturbations. J Neurophysiol 48: 388–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowska E, Padel Y, Tanaka R (1976) Disynaptic inhibition of spinal motoneurons from the motor cortex in the monkey. J Physiol (Lond) 258: 467–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongen HAH, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM (1989) Inhomogeneous activation of motoneurone pools as revealed by co-contraction of antagonistic human arm muscles. Exp Brain Res 75: 555–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney RE, Hunter IW (1990) System identification of human joint dynamics. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18: 55–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh TJ, Grabiner MD (1993) Evaluation of methods to minimize cross talk in surface electromyography. J Biomech [Suppl 1] 26: 151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Licata F, Soechting JF (1982) The mechanical behavior of the human forearm in response to transient perturbations. Biol Cybern 44: 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Borghese NA, Carrozzo M (1991) Transient reversal of the stretch reflex in human arm muscles. J Neurophysiol 66: 939–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Carrozzo M, Borghese NA (1993) Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man. J Neurophysiol 69: 1443–1464

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee RG, Tatton WG (1982) Long latency reflexes to imposed displacements of the human wrist: dependence on duration of movement. Exp Brain Res 45: 207–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner TE (1986) Judgment and control of velocity in rapid voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 62: 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner TE, Cloutier C (1993) Compensation for mechanically unstable loading in voluntary wrist movement. Exp Brain Res 94: 522–532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J, Petersen N, Deuschl G, Ballegaard M (1993) Task-related changes in the effect of magnetic brain stimulation on spinal neurones in man. J Physiol (Lond) 471: 223–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Riek S, Bawa P (1992) Recruitment of motor units in human forearm extensors. J Neurophysiol 68: 100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell J, Day B, Berardelli A, Marsden C (1984) Effects of motor cortex stimulation on spinal interneurones in intact man. Exp Brain Res 54: 382–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1981) The coactivation of antagonist muscles. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 59: 733–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler AE, Hutton RS (1986) Was Sherrington right about co-contractions? Brain Res 370: 171–175

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milner, T.E., Cloutier, C., Leger, A.B. et al. Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness. Exp Brain Res 107, 293–305 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230049

Key words

Navigation