Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How to improve the muscle synergy analysis methodology?

  • Invited Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Muscle synergy analysis is increasingly used in domains such as neurosciences, robotics, rehabilitation or sport sciences to analyze and better understand motor coordination. The analysis uses dimensionality reduction techniques to identify regularities in spatial, temporal or spatio-temporal patterns of multiple muscle activation. Recent studies have pointed out variability in outcomes associated with the different methodological options available and there was a need to clarify several aspects of the analysis methodology. While synergy analysis appears to be a robust technique, it remain a statistical tool and is, therefore, sensitive to the amount and quality of input data (EMGs). In particular, attention should be paid to EMG amplitude normalization, baseline noise removal or EMG filtering which may diminish or increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the EMG signal and could have major effects on synergy estimates. In order to robustly identify synergies, experiments should be performed so that the groups of muscles that would potentially form a synergy are activated with a sufficient level of activity, ensuring that the synergy subspace is fully explored. The concurrent use of various synergy formulations-spatial, temporal and spatio-temporal synergies- should be encouraged. The number of synergies represents either the dimension of the spatial structure or the number of independent temporal patterns, and we observed that these two aspects are often mixed in the analysis. To select a number, criteria based on noise estimates, reliability of analysis results, or functional outcomes of the synergies provide interesting substitutes to criteria solely based on variance thresholds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EMG:

Electromyography

ICA:

Independent component analysis

iEMG:

Integrated EMG

NNMF:

Non-negative matrix factorization

PCA:

Principal component analysis

pNMF:

Projective non-negative matrix factorization

RMS:

Root mean square

SNR:

Signal to noise ratio

SSE:

Sum of squared errors

SST:

Total sum of square

SVD:

Singular value decomposition

VAF:

Variance accounted for

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Benjie BARTOS for the English corrections. We also thank Tieme LARAQUE for his valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas A. Turpin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Michael Lindinger.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 145 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turpin, N.A., Uriac, S. & Dalleau, G. How to improve the muscle synergy analysis methodology?. Eur J Appl Physiol 121, 1009–1025 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04604-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04604-9

Keywords

Navigation