Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Source localization of two evoked magnetic field components using two alternative procedures

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of two methods in assessing the location of the sources of the N100 and P200 components of evoked magnetic fields (EMFs) to transient tone stimuli. EMFs to left ear stimulation, containing both components, were recorded over the right hemisphere of six normal subjects. The magnetic scalp distributions calculated at several adjacent time points, covering the duration of each component's peak, were used to estimate the source parameters of each component. Good estimates of the source of both components were obtained from all magnetic field distributions. The averaged spatial parameters derived from all distributions of each component as well as the parameters derived from the distribution that gave the best source estimate for each component were projected onto magnetic resonance images of subject's head. It was found that the source of each component is located on the superior surface of the temporal lobe and that the source of the P200 component is anterior to the N100 source in all subjects using both procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Reinikainen K (1987) Analysis of magnetoencephalographic data obtained with a four channel SQUID magnetometer. In: Atsumi K, Kotani M, Llenos S, Katila T, Williamson SJ (eds) Biomagnetism 1987. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 299–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Hari R, Kaila K, Katila T, Tuomisto T, Varpula T (1982) Interstimulus interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54:561–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanicolaou AC, Baumann S, Rogers RL, Saydjari C, Amparo EG, Eisenberg HM (1989) Localization of auditory response sources using magnetoencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol (in press)

  • Pelizzone M, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L (1985) Evidence for multiple areas in the human auditory cortex. In: Weinberg H, Stroink G, Katila T (eds) Biomagnetism: applications and theory. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 326–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Press WH et al. (1986) Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers RL, Papanicolaou AC, Baumann S, Saydjari C, Eisenberg HM (1989) Nonstationary dynamics of sequential magnetic dipole source changes associated with N100 auditory evoked responses. In: Biomagnetism. Plenum Press, New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sams M, Hämäläinen M, Antervo A, Kaukoranta E, Reinikainen L, Hari R (1985) Cerebral neuromagnetic responses evoked by short auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 61:254–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto T, Hari R, Katila T, Poutanen T, Varpula T (1983) Studies of auditory evoked magnetic and electric responses: modality specificity and modelling. Nuovo Cimento 2D:471–483

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Papanicolaou, A.C., Rogers, R.L., Baumann, S. et al. Source localization of two evoked magnetic field components using two alternative procedures. Exp Brain Res 80, 44–48 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228845

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228845

Key words

Navigation