Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic and phenotypic relationships in response to NaCl at different developmental stages in alfalfa

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The perennial forage alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) may be affected by salinity at all stages of development. Selection for increased seed germination or seedling growth in saline environments has not resulted in improved forage yield under salt stress. The purpose of this study was to determine genetic and phenotypic relationships between plant performance in the presence of NaCl at three developmental stages in alfalfa. Understanding these relationships may improve the efficiency of breeding programs aimed at increasing crop survival and yields in saline environments. Fourteen half-sib families were randomly chosen from both an experimental alfalfa population produced from two cycles of mass selection for improved forage regrowth yield at 80 mM NaCl (A80), as well as from an unselected control population (AC1). In two separate experiments, individual plant performance was measured in these families at seed germination (radicle length at 7 days), and during seedling growth (forage yield at 40 days post-planting) and post-harvest regrowth (forage yield at 67 and 95 days post-planting) in the presence of 0 or 80 mM NaCl. Genetic, phenotypic, and family rank correlation coefficients, and broad-sense and narrow-sense heritability estimates were calculated within each growth stage, NaCl level, and population. Radicle length was not highly correlated with seedling or regrowth forage yield within a population or across NaCl levels. Phenotypic correlations between seedling and regrowth yields were also low. Heritability estimates were higher at 0 NaCl in AC1 between all growth stages, but were greater in A80 at 80 mM NaCl. Genetic correlations between seedling and regrowth yields were all positive. This suggests that selection for forage yield in saline environments at harvests-1,-2, or -3 should not decrease performance at other stages. Genetic correlations between seedling and regrowth yields were higher in A80 than in AC1 at 80 mM NaCl. The results indicate that selection for increased alfalfa forage yield in saline environments at germination may not be optimum. Family selection at germination or during seedling growth may be more effective than individual plant selection at any growth stage in saline environments. The results suggest than selection methods which include each critical growth stage may be required to develop alfalfa cultivars with increased forage yield in saline environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen SG (1984) Physiology of salt tolerance in alfalfa. PhD thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson/AZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen SG, Dobrenz AK, Schonhorst MH, Stoner JE (1985) Heritability of NaCl tolerance in germinating alfalfa seeds. Agron 177:99–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, McNeilly T, Bradshaw AD (1986) The response to NaCl and ionic content of selected salt-tolerant and normal lines of three legume forage species in sand culture. New Phytol 104:463–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, McNeilly T, Bradshaw AD (1987) Selection and heritability of tolerance to sodium chloride in four forage species. Crop Sci 26:232–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Assadian NW, Miyamoto S (1987) Salt effects on alfalfa seedling emergence. Agron S 79:710–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers AD, Hayward HE (1948) A method for measuring the effects of soil salinity on seed germination with observations on several crop plants. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 13:224–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (1988) Plant breeding for stress environments. CRC Press, Boca Raton/FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns G, Billard TC, Matsui KM (1990) Salinity threat to Upper Egypt. Nature 344:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson JR, Ditterline RL, Martin JM, Sands DC, Lund RE (1983) Alfalfa seed germination in antibiotic agar containing NaCl. Crop Sci 23:882–885

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrenz AK, Schonhorst MH, Stone JE, Thompson RK, Allen S, Smith D (1983) Registration of AZ-GERM SALT-I nondormant alfalfa germplasm. Crop Sci 23:807

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrenz AK, Robinson DL, Smith SE, Poteet DC (1989) Registration of AZ-GERM SALT-II nondormant alfalfa germplasm. Crop Sci 29:293

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RR Jr, Leath KT (1979) Comparison of four methods of selection for resistance to Leptosphaerulina briosiana in alfalfa. Can J Genet Cytol 21:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Stn Circ 347

  • Johnson DW (1990) Stress productivity in alfalfa: selection under saline and non-saline environmental conditions. PhD thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, Diss Abs 51:4648B

  • Johnson DW, Smith SE, Dobrenz AK (1991) Registration of AZ-90NDC-ST nondormant alfalfa germplasm with improved forage yield in saline environments. Crop Sci 31:1098–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RA (1987) Genetic advances in salt tolerance: In: Nevins DJ, Jones RA (eds) Tomato biotechnology. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalu BA, Fick GW (1981) Quantifying morphological development of alfalfa for studies of herbage quality. Crop Sci 21:267–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapulnik Y, Teuber LR, Phillips DA (1989) Lucerne (Medicago sativa) selected for vigor in a nonsaline environment maintained growth under salt stress. Aust J Agric Res 40:1253–1259

    Google Scholar 

  • Levings III CS, Dudley JW (1963) Evaluation of certain mating designs for estimation of genetic variance in autotetraploid alfalfa. Crop Sci 3:532–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas EV (1986) Salt tolerance of plants. Appl Agric Res 1:12–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas EV, Hoffman GJ (1977) Crop salt tolerance — current assessment. J Irrig Drainage Div Am Soc Civ Eng 103:115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • McKell CM, Goodin JR, Jefferies RL (1986) Saline land of the United States of America and Canada. Reclam Reveg Res 5:159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • McKimmie T, Dobrenz AK (1987) A method for evaluation of salt tolerance during germination, emergence, and seedling establishment. Agron J 79:943–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad RM, Campbell WF, Rumbaugh MD (1989) Variation in salt tolerance of alfalfa. Arid Soil Res 3:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HT, Sleper DA (1983) Theory and application of halfsib matings in forage grass breeding. Theor Appl Genet 64:187–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble CL, Halloran GM, West DW (1984) Identification and selection for salt tolerance in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Aust J Agric Res 35:239–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott SJ, Jones RA, Williams WA (1984) Review of data analysis methods for seed germination. Crop Sci 24:1192–1199

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon MC (1985) Principles and strategies in breeding for higher salt tolerance. Plant Soil 89:227–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SE, Dobrenz AK (1987) Seed age and salt tolerance at germination in alfalfa. Crop Sci 27:1053–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SE, Meiners M, Putzar N, Dobrenz AK (1989) Potential use of measurements of callus and male gametophyte NaCl tolerance in lucerne breeding. Euphytica 43:245–251

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. L. Kahler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, D.W., Smith, S.E. & Dobrenz, A.K. Genetic and phenotypic relationships in response to NaCl at different developmental stages in alfalfa. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 83, 833–838 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226705

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226705

Key words

Navigation