Skip to main content
Log in

Selection index updating

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

When traits become evident at different ages or there are large differences in the costs of measuring various traits, selection by independent culling levels may give a higher aggregate economic return than index selection because not all traits need to be measured on all individuals. The problems with optimum independent culling selection is that general solutions are not possible and numerical integration is needed for specific cases. Recently, Xu and Muir (1991) developed a new independent culling level procedure by use of orthogonal transformation of the original characters. With their procedure, explicit solutions for optimum truncation points are possible without numerical integration. As such, the procedure is proficient for any number of stages, and generalized theoretical comparisons of alternative breeding strategies are possible. However, their procedure was limited to the case where selection is for one character at each stage. In this paper, our previous results are extended to the general case of multi-stage index selection, called selection index updating. This procedure is called selection index updating because as traits become available in latter stages, each subsequent index contains all of the traits available up to that stage.

The procedure is to develop sequential indices for each stage such that correlations among indices at different stages are zero. Optimum culling points are obtained for the updating procedure by using Xu and Muir's (1991) iterative equations. Due to the property of orthogonality of the updated indices, aggregate gain can be partitioned into gains due to various stages of selection. Partitioning of aggregate economic gain is useful to breeders who desire to adjust individual trait selection intensity based on facilities available at that stage. Methods are discussed to modify the procedure to obtain maximum aggregate economic return per unit of cost associated with obtaining measures on each trait. An application of multi-stage selection is demonstrated using a set of data for Rhode Island Red layer type chickens. A second example demonstrates the use of multi-stage selection optimized with respect to aggregate economic gain and costs associated with obtaining measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbar MK, Gyles NR, Brown CJ (1986) The theory and applications of selection indexes for the improvement of modern poultry stocks. Arkansas Agric Exp Stn, University of Arkansas

  • Cunningham EP (1975) Multi-stage index selection. Theor Appl Genet 46:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducrocq V, Colleau JJ (1989) Optimum truncation points for independent culling level selection on a multivariate normal distribution, with an application to dairy cattle selection. Genet Sel Evol 21:185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd ed. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazel LN, Lush JL (1942) The efficiency of three methods of selection. J. Hered 33:393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne O, Nordskog AW (1959) Restricted selection indices. Biometrics 15:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RS, Peters G, Wilkinson JH (1965) Symmetric decomposition of a positive definite matrix. Num Math 7:362–383

    Google Scholar 

  • NamKoong G (1970) Optimum allocation of selection intensity in two stages of truncation selections. Biometrics 26:465–476

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1985) SAS users' guide: basics, version 5. SAS Institute Inc, Cary N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton AM (1989) INDCULL Version 30: Independent culling for two or more traits. J Hered 80:166–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1967) Linear regression analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SP, Quass RL (1982) Optimal truncation points for independent culling level selection involving two traits. Biometrics 38:975–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing TL, Nordskog AW (1982) Use of individual feed records in a selection program for egg production efficiency. II. Effectiveness of different selection indexes. Poul Sci 61:231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Muir WM (1991) Multi-stage selection for genetic gain by orthogonal transformation. Genetics 129:963–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Young SSY (1964) Multi-stage selection for genetic gain. Heredity 19:131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Young SSY, Weiler H (1961) Selection for two correlated traits by independent culling levels. J. Genet 57:329–338

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by D. Van Vleck

Journal Paper No. 12813 of the Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, S., Muir, W.M. Selection index updating. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 83, 451–458 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226533

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226533

Key words

Navigation