Skip to main content
Log in

Intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content among world populations of a mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse)

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Aedes albopictus is commonly distributed in most parts of the Oriental region and on many islands in the Indian and the Pacific Oceans. The species was recently introduced into the United States and Brazil. Feulgen cytophotometric quantitation of haploid nuclear DNA content was carried out for 37 populations of Ae. albopictus to determine the extent of intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content and whether the range expansion of the species has coincided with an increase in DNA content. The haploid nuclear DNA content varied nearly three-fold. The minimum DNA content was 0.62 pg in Koh Samui from Thailand, and the maximum DNA content was 1.66 pg in Houston-61 from the United States. Statistical comparisons of populations revealed significant differences in DNA contents. No geographic clustering of populations was noted with respect to DNA content. In general, populations from the United States and Brazil had higher DNA contents, but there was no indication that the range expansion had occurred hand in hand with an increase in DNA content. Each population had a specific amount of DNA that is probably imposed by the microenvironment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altamura MM, Bass P, Cavallini A, Cionini G, Cremonini R, Monacelli B, Pasqua G, Sassoli O, Tran Thanh K van, Cionini PG (1987) Nuclear DNA changes during plant development and the morphogenetic response in vitro of Nicotiana tabacum tissues. Plant Sci 53:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann K, Goin OB, Goin CJ (1972) Nuclear DNA amounts in vertebrates. Brookhaven Symp Biol 23:419–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassi P, Cionini PG, Cremonini R, Seghizzi P (1984) Under-representation of nuclear DNA sequences in differentiating root cells of Vicia faba. Protoplasma 123:70–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MD (1976) DNA amounts, latitude, and crop plant distribution. Environ. Exp Bot 16:93–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyn GP, Miksche JP (1976) Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. Iowa University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Black WC IV, Rai KS (1988) Genome evolution in mosquitoes; intraspecific and interspecific variation in repetitive DNA amounts and organization. Genet Res 51:185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton DW, Bickham JW, Genoways HH (1989) Flow-cytophotometric analyses of nuclear DNA content in four families of neotropical bats. Evolution 43:756–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1985a) Introduction: the evolutionary significance of genome size. In: Cavalier-Smith T (ed) The evolution of genome size. Wiley, New York, pp 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T (1985b) Eukaryotic gene numbers, non-coding DNA and genome size. In: Cavalier-Smith T (ed) The evolution of genome size. Wiley, New York, pp 69–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallini A, Zolfini C, Cionini G, Cremonini R, Natali L, Sassoli O, Cionini PG (1986) Nuclear DNA changes within Helianthus annus L.: cytophotometric, karyological, and biochemical analyses. Theor Appl Genet 73:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Cionini PG (1990) Nuclear DNA changes during plant development. G Bot Ital (in press)

  • Cullis CA (1983) Environmentally induced changes in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 1:117–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle WF, Sapienza C (1980) Selfish genes, the phenotypic paradigm and genome evolution. Nature 284:601–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling AW, Atkin NB, Setzer PY (1971) Genome sizes of teleostean fishes: increases in some deep-sea species. Am Nat 105:549–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari JA, Rai KS (1989) Phenotypic correlates of genome size variation in Aedes albopictus. Evolution 43:895–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell RB, Bennett MD, Smith JB, Smith DB (1974) Genome size and the production of repetitive nucleotide sequence DNA in plants. Biochem Genet 12:257–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Forratini OP (1986) Identificacao de Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus do Brasil. Rev Saude Publ S Paulo 20:244–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold JR, Amemiya CT (1987) Genome size variation in North American minnows (Cyprinidae). II. Variation amont 20 species. Genome 29:481–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold JR, Price HJ (1987) Genome size variation in North American minnows (Cyprinidae). I. Distribution of the variation in five species. Heredity 54:297–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley WA (1988) The biology of Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Contr Ass [Suppl 4]: 1–40

  • Hinengardner R (1976) Evolution of genome size: In: Ayala FJ (ed) Molecular Evolution. Sinauer, Massachusetts, pp 179–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson J, Narayan RJK, Rees H (1980) Constraints on the composition of supplementary DNA. Chromosoma 78:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson OW, Utter FM, Renovitch PS (1987) Interspecific differences in salmonid cellular DNA identified by flow cytometry. Copeia 1987:1001–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird CD (1973) DNA of Drosophila chromosomes. Annu Rev Genet 7:177–204

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLain DK, Rai KS, Fraser MJ (1987) Intraspecific and interspecific variation in the sequence and abundance of highly repeated DNA among mosquitoes of the Aedes albopictus subgroup. Heredity 58:373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazim AL (1980) Nuclear DNA in anurans of the USSR. Experientia 36:190–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Miksche JP (1971) Intraspecific variation of DNA per cell between Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. provenances. Chromosoma 32:343–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Natali L, Cavallini A, Cremonini R, Bass P, Cionini PG (1986) Amplification of nuclear DNA sequences during induced plant cell dedifferentiation. Cell Differ 18:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgel LE, Crick FHC (1980) Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature 284:604–607

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patau K (1952) Absorption microphotometry of irregularshaped objects. Chromosoma 5:341–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao PN, Rai KS (1987) Interand intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content in Aedes mosquitoes. Heredity 59:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees H, Jones GH (1972) The origin of the wide species variation in nuclear DNA content. Int Rev Cytol 32:53–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood SW, Patton JL (1982) Genome evolution in pocket gophers (genus Thomomys). II. Variation in cellular DNA content. Chromosoma 85:163–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuter BJ, Thomas JE, Taylor WD, Zimmerman M (1983) Phenotypic correlates of genomic DNA contents in unicellular eukaryotes and other cells. Am Nat 122:26–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CE (1956) The history of dengue in tropical Asia and its relationships to the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Trop Med Hyg 59:243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow AH, Price HJ, Underbrink AG (1972) A survey of DNA content per cell and per chromosome of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms: some evolutionary considerations. Brookhaven Symp Biol 23:451–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Walbot V, Cullis CA (1985) Rapid genome changes in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 36:367–396

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by F. Mechelke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Rai, K.S. Intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content among world populations of a mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse). Theoret. Appl. Genetics 79, 748–752 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224239

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224239

Key words

Navigation