Skip to main content
Log in

RFLP-based phylogeny of Musa species in Papua New Guinea

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Random genomic probes were used to detect restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in 26 accessions of Musa representing eight species from Papua New Guinea (PNG), M. textilis, M. jackeyi and one accession of Ensete. Ninety-eight phylogenetically informative characters were scored and analyzed cladistically and phenetically. Results generally agreed with previous morphology-based phylogenetic analyses. However, the closest wild relative of the edible M. fehi (fe'i banana) appears to be M. lolodensis. Musa angustigemma is sister species with M. boman and M. jackeyi and is distinct from M. peekelii, with which it is often united. Musa boman is unambiguously placed in section Australimusa. The diploid parthenocarpic landraces of section Musa unique to PNG are closely related to, but apparently distinct from, M. acuminata ssp. banksii. The evolution of the fe'i bananas and the M. acuminata-derived diploid landraces of PNG are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argent GCC (1976) The wild bananas of Papua New Guinea. Notes R Bot Gard Edinburgh 35:77–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JG (1893) A synopsis of the genera and species of Musaceae. Ann Bot 7:189–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker JL, Umali DL (1956) Classification of Philippine Musae I. The genera Musa L. and Ensete Horan. Philipp Agric 40:231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheesman EE (1947) Classification of the bananas. II. The genus Musa L. Kew Bull 2:106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheesman EE (1949) Classification of the bananas. III. Critical notes on species. Kew Bull 4:445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheesman EE (1950) Classification of the bananas. III. Critical notes on species. Kew Bull 4:27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debener T, Salamini F, Gebhardt C (1990) Phylogeny of wild and cultivated Solanum species based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLPs). Theor Appl Genet 79:360–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds KS (1946) M. fehi, the indigenous banana of Fiji. Nature 157:729–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1986) PHYLIP (Phylogenetic Inference Package) version 2.9. University of Washington, Pullman, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (1983) Production year book 1983. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawel N, Jarret RL, Whittemore A (1992) Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-based phylogenetic analysis of Musa. Theor Appl Genet (in press).

  • Havey MJ, Muehlbauer FJ (1989) Variability for restriction fragment lengths phylogenies in lentil. Theor Appl Genet 77:839–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarret RL (1990) Identification of genetic diversity in the genus Musa. INIBAP, Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDaniels LH (1947) A study of the Fe'i banana and its distribution with reference to Polynesian migrations. Bernice P Bishop Museum Bull 190, Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, pp 3–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menancio DI, Hepburn AG, Hymowitz T (1990) Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of wild perennial relatives of soybean. Theor Appl Genet 79:235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JC, Tanksley SD (1990) RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80:437–448.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhumphius GE (1750) Herbarium Amboinense, 5.

  • Richardson JM (1957) The fibers of Australimusa in relation to abaca improvement. Trop Agric (Trinidad) 34:207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe PR (1981) Breeding an intractable crop. Bananas. In: Rachie KO, Lyman JM (eds) Genetic engineering for crop improvement. Working Papers, Rockefeller Foundation, pp 66–84.

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1988) SAS/STAT user's guide. SAS Institute, Gary, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock S (1990) Collecting Musa in Papua New Guinea. In: Jarret RL (ed) Identification of genetic diversity in the genus Musa. INIBAP, Montpellier, France, pp 140–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd K (1990) Observations on Musa taxonomy. In: Jarret RL (ed) Identification of genetic diversity in the genus Musa. INIBAP, Montpellier, France, pp 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1948) Classification of the bananas. III. Critical notes on species. Kew Bull 5:573–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1956a) Botanical results of the banana collecting expedition 1954–55. Kew Bull 11:463–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1956b) A banana collecting expedition to South East Asia and the Pacific. Trop Agric (Trinidad) 33:251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1959) The bananas. Longmans, Green and Co, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1962) The evolution of the bananas. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW, Weatherup ST (1990) Numerical taxonomy of the wild bananas (Musa). New Phytol 115:567–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song KM, Osborn TC, Williams PH (1988) Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet 76:593–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern E (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:302–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (1985) PAUP-Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.2. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL, R Sclander (1989) Biosys-1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezenas du Montcel H (1990) Musa acuminata subspecies banksii: status and diversity. In: Jarret RL (ed) Identification of genetic diversity in the genus Musa. INIBAP, Montpellier, France, pp 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. Beckmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jarret, R.L., Gawel, N., Whittemore, A. et al. RFLP-based phylogeny of Musa species in Papua New Guinea. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 84, 579–584 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224155

Key words

Navigation