Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Statocysts of hydromedusae

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The statocysts of Leptomedusae are formed as a depression in the velum. They are lined on the inside towards the distal part of the velum by thin epithelium and towards the proximal part by ciliated sensory cells. Lithocytes are present in the centre. The concretion contains calcium sulphate and in some cases, calcium phosphate is also present in addition to some membranous material.

The statocysts of Narcomedusae arise from the exumbrellar nerve ring as free sensory clubs. They have a proximal basal cushion of sensory cells from the centre of which arises a sensory club (Aegina) or a sensory papilla carrying a sensory club (Solmissus). The sensory club has an axial strand of endodermal cells covered by ciliated sensory cells. Some of the endodermal cells have a concretion. While the statocysts of Leptomedusae are totally ectodermal, those of Narcomedusae are ecto-endodermal in origin.

The sensory cilia of Leptomedusae, especially those present on the sensory cells adjacent to the lithocyte, run close and parallel to the lithocyte membrane. In Narcomedusae the sensory cilia of the basal cushion and sensory papilla are tall and strong. Ciliary rootlets are missing in the sensory cilia of Leptomedusae and in the sensory club of Narcomedusae but they are strongly developed in the cilia of basal cushion and sensory papilla. The cilia have 9+2 filament content. A ring of stereocilia surrounds the kinocilium of the sensory club cells. Mechanism of statocyst function is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouillon, J.: Etude monographique du genre Limocnida (Limnomedusae). Ann. Soc. Zool. Belg. 87, 11, 253–500 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozler, E.: Sinnes-und nervenphysiologische Untersuchungen an Scyphomedusen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 4, 37–80 (1926)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorey, A. E.: The organisation and replacement of epidermis in acoellus turbellarians. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 106, 147–172 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fränkel, G.: Der statische Sinn der Medusen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 2, 658–690 (1925)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, D. E.: The transducer action of mechanoreceptor membranes. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 59–68 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. E.: Cytoarchitectural basis of the cochlear transducer. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 147–157 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, O., Hertwig, R.: Das Nervensystem und die Sinnesorgane der Medusen. Leipzig 1878

  • Hillman, D. E., Lewis, E. R.: Morphological basis for a mechanical transduction in the frog. Science 174, 416–418 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge, G. A.: The nerves and muscles of medusae IV. Inhibition in Aequorea forskalia. J. exp. Biol. 32, 642–648 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge, G. A.: Statocysts of medusae and evolution of stereocilia. Tissue and Cell 1, 341–353 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Humason, G. L.: Animal tissue technique, p. 261. San Francisco: Freeman & Co. 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillie, R. D.: Histopathologic technique and practical histochemistry. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Co. 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Linko, A.: Bau der Augen bei den Hydromedusen. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersbourg. Mem. Ser.8, 10, 1–22 (1900)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. H.: Improvement in epoxy resin embedding methods. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 9, 409–414 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. C., Jarett, L., Finke, E. H.: Embedding in epoxy resin for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy. Stain Technol. 35, 313–322 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, F. S.: The medusa of the British Isles. London: Cambridge University Press 1953

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, D. B.: Statolith differentiation in Aurelia aurita. J. exp. Zool. 169, 487–499 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, D. B., Beck, C. W.: Calcium sulphate dihydrate in Aurelia. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc. 87, 329–335 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thürm, U.: An insect mechanoreceptor. I. Fine structure and adequate stimulus. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 75–82 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Venable, H. J., Coggeshall, R. A.: A simplified lead citrate stain for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 25, 407–408 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. B.: Ear structure and function in modern mammals. Amer. Zool. 6, 451–466 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, B. S.: Construction and use of the vibrating needle for embryonic operations. Bioscience 18, 226–228 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. Z.: The statocysts of Octopus vulgaris. Proc. roy. Soc. B 152, 3–29 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

    C. L. Singla

Authors
  1. C. L. Singla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I am indebted to Professor G. O. Mackie for his valuable criticism and Dr. R. L. Fernald for the use of facilities of the University of Washington, Friday Harbor Laboratory. I am grateful to Mr. H. F. Dietrich for technical help.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singla, C.L. Statocysts of hydromedusae. Cell Tissue Res. 158, 391–407 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223835

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223835

Key words

Search

Navigation