Skip to main content
Log in

Photoperiod gene control over partitioning between reproductive and vegetative growth

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The hypothesis tested was that lack of photoperiod gene activity allows inherent partitioning of photosynthate to continued growth of the earliest potential buds, flowers, pods, and seeds (the organs that give rise to the yield). Alternatively, and competitively, photoperiod gene activity causes the photosynthate to be partitioned predominantly toward continued growth of new vegetative organs plus later initiation of more reproductive (yield) organs. This hypothesis was tested by comparing an insensitive and a photoperiod-sensitive bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar and their F1 with F2 segregates of undetermined genotype. Randomly derived homozygous F8 segregates were also compared. The F8 generation included one photoperiod-insensitive and one photoperiod-sensitive genotype in a 1:1 ratio, which verified control by one photoperiod gene. Under long daylength (LD), in addition to early versus late flowering and maturity, the two genotypes expressed opposite levels of 23 other traits that would be changed by competitive partitioning of the photosynthate. In contrast, under short daylength (SD), both genotypes flowered and matured early, and both expressed the levels for all 25 traits that the photoperiod-insensitive genotype expressed in both SD and LD. The photoperiod gene interacted with daylength to control the levels of all three major physiological components of yield: the aerial biomass, harvest index, and days to maturity. Included among the other traits with levels altered by daylength-modulated photoperiod gene activity were: the number of branches, nodes, leaves and leaf area, the rate of yield accumulation, and sink activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bravo A (1975) Characterization of high yielding dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars by simplified growth analysis. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez GA (1975) Effect of temperature and daylength on time of flowering in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaytan MA, Kohashi-Shibata J (1991) Flowering in bean: number of cycles to induce anthesis and duration of the flowering stimulus in two varieties of (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Bean Improvement Coop Annu Rep 34:80–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Gniffke PA (1982) Varietal differences in photoperiodically mediated flowering responses in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). MSc thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gniffke PA (1985) Studies of phonological variation in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as modulated by mean temperature and photoperiod. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenham J (1982) Vegetative and reproductive development in a photoperiod sensitive and an insensitive cultivar, as influenced by environment. MSc thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges T (1991) Predicting crop phenology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kueneman EA (1978) Evaluation of the yield potential of growth habits of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and determination of plant types of high density plantings. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kueneman EA, Sandsted RF, Wallace DH, Bravo A, Wien HC (1979) Effect of plant arrangements and densities on yields of dry beans. Agron J 71:419–424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenya HK, Korban SS, Coyne DP (1982) Changes in patterns of inheritance of flowering time of dry beans in different environments. J Hered 73:306–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Masaya PN (1978) Genetic and environmental control of flowering in Phaseolus vulgaris L. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DG, Morgan CB (1984) Photoperiod and the abscission of flower buds in Phaseolus vulgaris. In: Vince-Prue D, Thomas B, Cockshull KE (eds) Light and the flowering process. Academic Press, New York, pp 227–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad AFH (1983) The effects of daylength and temperature on days to first flower and maturity in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murfet IC (1977) Environmental interaction and the genetics of flowering. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 28:253–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutters RG, Hall AE, Patel PN (1989) Photoperiod and light quality effects on cowpea floral development at high temperatures. Crop Sci 29:1501–1505

    Google Scholar 

  • Padda DS, Munger HM (1969) Photoperiod, temperature and genotype interactions affecting time of flowering in beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 94:157–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinby JR (1975) The genetics of sorghum improvement. J Hered 66:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger R (1976) Glossary of genetics and cytogenetics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudorf W (1958) Genetics of Phaseolus aborigineus Bukart. In: Proc X Int Cong Genet vol 2. p 243

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury FB, Ross CW (1991) Plant physiology 4th edn. Wadsworth Publ, Belmont, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully BT, Wallace DH (1990) Variation in and relationship of biomass, growth rate, harvest index, and phenology to yield of common bean. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 115:218–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire GR (1990) The physiology of tropical crop production. Bookcraft, Bath, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Enriquez GA (1980) Daylength and temperature effects on days to flowering of early and the maturing beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 105:583–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Gniffke PA, Masaya PN, Zobel RW (1991) Photoperiod, temperature and genotype interaction effects on days and node to flowering of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116:534–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Baudoin JP, Beaver JS, Coyne DP, Halseth DE, Masaya PN, Munger HM, Myers JR, Silbernagel M, Yourstone KS, Zobel RW (1993a) Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theor Appl Genet 86:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Zobel RW, Yourstone KS (1993c) A whole-system reconsideration of paradigms about photoperiod and temperature control of crop yield. Theor Appl Genet 86:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wareing PF, Patrick J (1975) Source-sink relations and the partitioning of assimilates in the plant. In: Cooper JP (ed) Photosynthesis and productivity in different environments. (International Biological Programme vol 3). Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 481–499

    Google Scholar 

  • White JW, Laing DR (1989) Photoperiod response of flowering in diverse genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Field Crops Res 22:113–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Department of Plant Breeding and Biometry paper no. 758

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, D.H., Yourstone, K.S., Masaya, P.N. et al. Photoperiod gene control over partitioning between reproductive and vegetative growth. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 86, 6–16 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223803

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223803

Key words

Navigation