Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic diversity in the orange subfamily Aurantioideae. II. Genetic relationships among genera and species

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic relationships were studied by means of ten isoenzymatic systems, at the genus and species level, using two distances and four methods of aggregation in a germplasm collection of 198 cultivars and accessions of 54 species belonging to Citrus and 13 related genera. The most consistent results were obtained by the chord distance and the neighbor-joining clustering method. Citrus species were distributed in two main groups: the orange-mandarin group and the lime lemon-citron-pummelo group. The species C. halimii and C. tachibana are not included in these groups. Mandarin species fall into three main subgroups: one includes C. sinensis; the second, C. aurantium, the third, small-fruit species. The citron, the pummelo and the ancient lemon subgroups form a cluster to which the species belonging to subgenus Papeda and the cultivated limes, lemons and bergamots are related. Microcitrus spp, to which Severinia buxifolia and Atalantia ceylanica seem to be related, cluster with the lime lemon-citron-pummelo group while Fortunella is close to the orange-mandarin group. Poncirus trifoliata, the most important species for citrus rootstock improvement is located far from Citrus but connected to it through Fortunella spp. A broad distribution of species has been found that should be taken into account to sample new genotypes in the search of desired characters in order to fully and efficiently use genetic resources for citrus improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asíns MJ, Herrero R, Navarro L (1995) Factors affecting Cirtus tree isozyme-gene expression. Theor Appl Genet 90:892–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett HC, Rhodes AM (1976) A numerical taxonomic study of affinity relationships in cultivated Cirus and its close relatives. Syst Bot 1:105–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzecri JP (1970) Distance distributionelle et metrique du chi-deux en analyse factorielle des correspondences. Laboratoire de Statistique Mahtematique, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel L (1978) Classification botanique des espèces du genre Citrus. Fruit 33:695–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretó MP, Asíns MJ, Carbonell EA (1993) Genetic variability in Lycopersicon species and their genetic relationships. Theor Appl Genet 86:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21:550–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Esen A, Scora RW (1977) Amylase polymorphism in Citrus and some related genera. Am J Bot 64:305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH (1990) Germplasm conservation and utilization in horticulture. In: Bennett AB, O'Neill SD (eds) Horticulture biotechnology. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RM, Vardi A, Galun E (1986) The plastome of Citrus. Physical map, variation among Citrus cultivars and species and comparison with related genera. Theor Appl Genet 72:170–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosser JW, Gmitter FG Jr (1990) Wide-hybridization of Citrus via protoplast fusion: progress, strategies and limitations. In: Bennett AB, O'Neill SD (eds) Horticultural biotechnology. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa T, Oogaki C (1985) Numerical taxonomic study of Citrus L. and Fortunella Swingle using morphological characters. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 54:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa T, Ishizawa Y, Oogaki C (1986) Phylogenetic study of fraction I progtectein study of fraction I protein in the genus Citrus and its close related genera. Jpn J Gen 61:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • He SW, Liu GF, Li WP (1988) Wild mandarin oranges in China. In: Goren R, Mendel K (eds) Proc Int Soc Citricult, vol 1. Balaband, Rehovot, Israel and Margrat Publishers, Weikersheim, Germany, pp 113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero R, Asíns MJ, Carbonell EA, Navarro L (1996) Genetic diversity in the orange subfamily Aurantioideae. I. Intraspecies and intragenus genetic variability. Theor Appl Genet 92:599–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai M, Kozaki I, Kajiura I (1986) Isozyme analysis and phylogenetic relationships of citrus. Jpn J Breed 36:377–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai M, Mitsue S, Kita K, Kajiura I (1990) A survey and isozyme analysis of wild mandarin, tachibana (Citrus tachibana (Mak.) Tanaka) growing in Japan. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 59:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson RW (1967) Horticultural varieties of citrus. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The citrus industry, vol 1. University of California, Berkeley, pp 431–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwamasa M, Nito N (1988) Cytogenetics and the evolution of modern cultivated citrus. In: Goren R, Mendel K (eds) Proc Int Soc Citricult, vol 1. Balaband, Rehovot, Israel and Margrat Publishers, Weikersheim, Germany, pp 265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwamasa M, Nito N, Ling J-T (1988) Intra- and intergeneric hybridization in the orange subfamily, Aurantioideae. In: Goren R, Mendel K (eds) Proc Int Soc Citricult, vol 1. Balaband, Rehovot, Israel and Margrat Publishers, Weikersheim, Germany, pp 123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozaki I, Hirai M (1981) Pollen ultrastructure of citrus cultivars. In: Matsumoto K (eds) Proc Int Soc Citricult, vol 1: I.S.C. Printing Co., Misaki-cho, Japan, pp 19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe F-J, Legendre P (1992) Statistical significnance of the matrix correlation coefficient for comparing independent phylogenetic trees. Syst Biol 41:378–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Luro F, Laigret F, Bové JM, Ollitrault P (1992) Application of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) to citrus genetics and taxonomy. In: Tribulato E, Gentile A, Reforgiato (eds) Proc Int Soc Citricult, vol 1. I.S.C., MCS Congress. Catania, Italy, pp 225–228

  • Malik MN, Scora RW, Soost RK (1974) Studies on the origin of the lemon. Hilgardia 42:361–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro L, Juarez J, Pina JA, Ballester LF, Arregui JM (1988) The citrus variety improvement program in Spain after eleven years. In: Goren R, Mendel K (eds) Proc 10th Conf Int Organization Citrus Virol IOCV. Balaband, Rehovot, Israel and Margrat Publishers, Weikersheim, Germany, pp 400–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1991) Relative efficiencies of different tree-making methods for molecular data. In: Miyamoto MM, Cracraft J (eds) Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 90–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollitrault P (1990) Isozymes and restriction fragment length polymorphisms as genetic markers in citrus selection. In: Proc 4th Asia-Pacific Int Conf Citrus Rehabilitation. FAO-UNDP RAS /86/022 regional project. FAO, Rone, pp 59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Potvin C, Bergeron Y, Simon JP (1983) A numerical taxonomic study of selected citrus species (Rutaceae) based on biochemical characters. Syst Bot 8:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Prim RC (1957) Shortest connection matrix network and some generalisations. Bell System Technol J 36:1389–1401

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Nito N, Isshiki S (1994) Genetic analysis of phosphoglucoisomerase isozymes in “true citrus fruit trees”. Sci Hortic 60:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose ML (1988) Isozymes and DNA restriction fragment polymorphism in citrus breeding and systematics. In: Goren R, Mendel K (eds) Proc Int Soc Citricult, vol 1. Balaband, Rehovot, Israel and Margrat Publishers, Weikersheim, Germany, pp 155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Scora RW (1988) Biochemistry, taxonomy and evolution of modern cultivated citrus. In: Goren R, Mendel K (eds) Proc Int Soc Citricult, vol 1. Balaband, Rehovot, Israel and Margrat Publishers, Weikersheim, Germany, pp 277–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Scora W, Kumamoto J (1983) Chemotaxonomy of the genus Citrus. In: Waterman PG, Grundon MF (eds) Chemistry and chemical taxonomy of the rutales. (Phytochem Soc Eur Symp Ser No 22.) Academic Press, London, pp 342–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman. San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone BC, Lowry JB, Scora RW, Jong K (1974) Citrus halimii: A new species from Malaya and Peninsular Thailand. Biotropica 5:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingle WT, Reece PC (1967) The botany of citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The citrus industry, vol 1. University of California, Berkeley, pp 190–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL, Olsen GJ (1990) Phylogeny reconstruction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C (eds) Molecular systematics. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland, Mass., pp 411–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres AM, Soost RK, Diedenhofen U (1978) Leaf isoenzymes as genetic markers in citrus. Am J Bot 65:869–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto M, Kobayashi S, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y (1993) Phylogenetic relationships of citrus revealed by RFLP analysis of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA. Jpn J Breed 43:355–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye YM, Kong Y, Zheng XH (1981) Studies on pollen morphology of citrus plants. In: Matsumoto K (ed) Proc Int Soc Citricult, vol 1. I.S.C. Printing Co., Misaki-cho, Japan, pp 23–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. M. A. Tigerstedt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrero, R., Asíns, M.J., Pina, J.A. et al. Genetic diversity in the orange subfamily Aurantioideae. II. Genetic relationships among genera and species. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 93, 1327–1334 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223466

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223466

Key words

Navigation