Skip to main content
Log in

MR imaging of the accessory soleus muscle appearance in six patients and a review of the literature

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined seven ankles with an accessory soleus muscle to determine if the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features were sufficient to allow accurate diagnosis of this anomalous muscle. We believe that the diagnosis of an accessory soleus muscle is unequivocal with MR imaging on the basis of morphology and signal intensity. Therefore, we suggest that this imaging method should be utilized in patients suspected of having a mass or with persistent swelling in the region of the ankle with or without pain, for the noninvasive diagnosis of this muscle and to better define the regional anatomy presperatively if surgery is being considered for relief of symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dunn AW. Anomalous muscles simulating soft tissue tumors in the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1965;47: 1397

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mansberg VJ, Van Neikerk AL. The accessory soleus muscle: a case report an review of the literature. Australas Radiol 1991;35: 276

    Google Scholar 

  3. Romanus B, Lindahl S, Stener B. Accessory soleus muscle. A clinical and radiographic presentation of eleven cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986;68: 731

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buschmann WR, Cheung Y, Jahss MH. Magnetic resonance imaging of anomalous leg muscles: accessory soleus, peroneus quartus and the flexor digitorum longus accessorius. Foot Ankle 1991;12: 109

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ekstrom JE, Shuman WP, Mack LA. MR imaging of accessory soleus muscle. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14: 239

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baran G, Sundaram M. Radiologic case study. Accessory soleus muscle. Orthopedics 14: 499

  7. Paul MA, Imanse J, Golding RP, Koomen AR, Meijer S. Accessory soleus muscle mimicking a soft tissue tumor: a report of 2 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1991;62: 609

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lorentzon R, Wirell S. Anatomic variations of the accessory soleus muscle. Acta Radiol 1987;28: 627

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bonnell J, Cruess R. Anomalous insertion of the soleus muscle as a cause of fixed equinus deformity: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51: 999

    Google Scholar 

  10. Danielsson LG, el-Haddad I, Sabri T. Clubfoot with supernumerary soleus muscle. Report of 2 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1990;61: 371

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon SL, Matheson DW. The accessory soleus. Clin Orthop 1973;97: 129

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ger R, Sedlin E. The accessory soleus muscle. Clin Orthop 1976;116: 200

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trosko JJ. Accessory soleus: a clinical perspective and report of three cases. J Foot Surg 1986;25: 296

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nichols GW, Kalenak A. The accessory soleus muscle. Clin Orthop 1984;190: 279

    Google Scholar 

  15. Apple JS, Martinez S, Khoury MB, Nunley JA. Case report 376: accessory (anomalous) soleus muscle. Skeletal Radiol 1986;15: 398

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy WA, Totty WG, Carroll JE. MRI of normal and pathologic skeletal muscle. AJR 1986;146: 565

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pettersson H, Giovannetti M, Gillespy T, Slone R, Springfield D. Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of supernumerary soleus muscle. Eur J Radiol 1987;7: 149

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wu KK. Accessory soleus muscle simulating a soft tissue tumor of the posteromedial ankle region. J Foot Surg 1991;30: 470

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, J.S., Resnick, D. MR imaging of the accessory soleus muscle appearance in six patients and a review of the literature. Skeletal Radiol. 23, 525–528 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223083

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223083

Key words

Navigation