Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MRI detection of soleus muscle injuries in professional football players

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of soleus muscle injuries in symptomatic professional football players stratified according to both the Munich consensus statement and the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC), and to investigate the association between specific MRI features and the “return to play” (RTP).

Materials and methods

Professional football players with an episode of acute posterior calf pain and impaired function, subsequent to sports activity, underwent ultrasound followed by MRI examination reviewed by two different radiologists with more than 10 years of experience in the musculoskeletal system. MRI features and RTP outcome were evaluated for all types of injuries.

Results

During a 36-month period, a total of 20 professional football players were evaluated. According to the Munich consensus, 11 were type 3A, 8 were type 3B, and 1 was type 4, whereas according to the BAMIC, 11 lesions were considered grade 1, 4 grade 2, 4 grade 3, and 1 grade 4. RTP data were available for all patients (mean 3.3 ± 1.6 weeks). Both the Munich consensus and the BAMIC correlated with RTP (Spearman correlation = 0.982 and p < 0.0001 and 0.886 and p < 0.0001 respectively). Extension of edema was an independent prognostic factor for RTP in two different models of multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.044 model A; p = 0.031 model B).

Conclusions

The Munich consensus and BAMIC grading systems are useful tools for defining the patient’s prognosis and proper rehabilitation time after injury. The MRI feature that we should carefully look for is the extension of edema, as it seems to significantly affect the RTP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Waldén M. Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer). Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(6):1226–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elias JJ, Faust AF, Chu YH, et al. The soleus muscle acts as an agonist for the anterior cruciate ligament. An in vitro experimental study. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(2):241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hodgson JA, Finni T, Lai AM, et al. Influence of structure on the tissue dynamics of the human soleus muscle observed in MRI studies during isometric contractions. J Morphol. 2006;267(5):584–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garrett WE Jr. Muscle strain injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(6 Suppl):S2–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Balius R, Rodas G, Pedret C, et al. Soleus muscle injury: sensitivity of ultrasound patterns. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(6):805–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koulouris G, Ting AYI, Jhamb A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of injuries to the calf muscle complex. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:921–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lundgren JM, Davis BA. Endartery stenosis of the popliteal artery mimicking gastrocnemius strain: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(9):1548–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bencardino JT, Rosenberg ZS, Brown RR, et al. Traumatic musculotendinous injuries of the knee: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiographics. 2000;20:S103–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koulouris G, Connell D. Hamstring muscle complex: an imaging review. Radiographics. 2005;25:571–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert TJ Jr, Bullis BR, Griffiths HJ. Tennis calf or tennis leg. Orthopedics. 1996;19(2):179. 182, 184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Millar AP. Strains of the posterior calf musculature ("tennis leg"). Am J Sports Med. 1979;7(3):172–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Noya J, Sillero M. Incidencia lesional en el fútbol profesional español a lo largo de una temporada: días de baja por lesión. Apunts Med Esport. 2012;47(176):115–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Orchard J, Best TM. The management of muscle strain injuries: an early return versus the risk of recurrence. Clin J Sport Med. 2002;12(1):3–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Orchard JW, Best TM, Mueller-Wohlfahrt HW, et al. The early management of muscle strains in the elite athlete: best practice in a world with a limited evidence basis. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:158–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brandser EA, el-Khoury GY, Kathol MH, et al. Hamstring injuries: radiographic, conventional tomographic, CT, and MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 1995;197:257–262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O'Donoghue DH. Treatment of injuries to athletes. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1984. p. 742.

  17. Kerkhoffs GMMJ, van Es N, Wieldraaijer T, et al. Diagnosis and prognosis of acute hamstring injuries in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:500–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Connell DA, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL, et al. Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments of acute and healing hamstring injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:975–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ekstrand J, Healy JC, Waldén M, et al. Hamstring muscle injuries in professional football: the correlation of MRI findings with return to play. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:112–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Askling CM, Tengvar M, Saartok T, et al. Acute first-time hamstring strains during high-speed running: a longitudinal study including clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Am J Sports Med. 2006;35:197–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Slavotinek J. Muscle injury: the role of imaging in prognostic assignment and monitoring of muscle repair. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14:194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mueller-Wohlfahrt HW, Haensel L, Mithoefer K, et al. Terminology and classification of muscle injuries in sport: the Munich consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(6):342–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pollock N, James SL, Lee JC, Chakraverty R. British athletics muscle injury classification: a new grading system. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(18):1347–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hayashi D, Hamilton B, Guermazi A, et al. Traumatic injuries of thigh and calf muscles in athletes: role and clinical relevance of MR imaging and ultrasound. Insights Imaging. 2012;3(6):591–601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Maffulli N, Oliva F, Frizziero A, et al. ISMuLT guidelines for muscle injuries. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014;3(4):241–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Balius R, Alomar X, Rodas G, et al. The soleus muscle: MRI, anatomic and histologic findings in cadavers with clinical correlation of strain injury distribution. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(4):521–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pedret C, Rodas G, Balius R, et al. Return to play after soleus muscle injuries. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;22:3(7).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ekstrand J, Askling C, Magnusson H, et al. Return to play after thigh muscle injury in elite football players: implementation and validation of the Munich muscle injury classification. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:769–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Paolo Ferrero for his assistance in statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, University Milano-Bicocca, Piazza OMS 1, Bergamo, Italy

    G. Pezzotta, G. Querques, A. Pecorelli, R. Nani & S. Sironi

Authors
  1. G. Pezzotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Querques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Pecorelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Nani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Sironi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Pezzotta.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pezzotta, G., Querques, G., Pecorelli, A. et al. MRI detection of soleus muscle injuries in professional football players. Skeletal Radiol 46, 1513–1520 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2729-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2729-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation