Skip to main content
Log in

An examination of the ability of RAPD markers to determine the relationships within and between Rubus species

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

RAPD markers were generated from 13 different Rubus species in order to assess the degree of similarity between species from the important subgenera. All ten primers revealed scorable polymorphisms within both the closely related and the genetically diverse individuals. Three hundred and seventy-two markers were generated and scored from the material analysed. Estimates of similarity, dendrograms and principle co-ordinate analysis were calculated, with the results generally being in agreemen with previous classifications of the species studied, confirming the validity and usefulness of the RAPD method. However, amongst the species studied, R. macraei of the Idaeobats proved more diverse and grouped in with both the Idaeobats and Eubats at only 26% similarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cousineau JC, Donnelly DJ (1989) Identification of raspberry cultivars in vivo and in vitro using isoenzyme analysis. HortSci 24:490–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner DE (1983) Leaf rust caused by Kuehneola uredinis on native and non-native Rubus species in Hawaii. Plant Dis 67:962–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, McNicol RJ, Greig K, Van de Ven WTG (1994) Identification of red raspberry cultivars and an assessment of their relatedness using fingerprints produced by random primers. J Hortic Sci 69:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell G, Garrie JB (1966) Fingerprinting raspberry cultivars by empirical paper chromatography. J Sci Food Agric 17:189–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL (1978) Plant breeding. Annual Report Scottish Crop Research Institute for 1978, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL (1988) Raspberries and blackberries: their breeding, diseases and growth. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5267–5273

    Google Scholar 

  • Nybom H, Rogstad SH, Schaal BA (1990) Genetic variation detected by use of the M13 ‘DNA fingerprint’ probe in Malus, Prunus and Rubus. Theor Appl Gen 79:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Ourecky DK (1975) Brambles. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, Indiana, pp 98–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent JG, Page D (1992) Identification of raspberry cultivars by non-radioactive DNA fingerprinting. HortSci 27:1108–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell W, Phillips MS, McNicol JW, Waugh R (1991) The use of DNA markers to estimate the extent and nature of genetic variability in Solanum tuberosum cultivars. Ann Appl Biol 118:423–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh R, Van de Ven WTG, Phillips MS, Powell W (1990) Chloroplast DNA diversity in the genus Rubus (Rosaceae) revealed by Southern hybridisation. Plant System Evol 172:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh J, McClellan M (1990) Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:7213–7218

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. M. A. Tigerstedt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graham, J., McNicol, R.J. An examination of the ability of RAPD markers to determine the relationships within and between Rubus species. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 90, 1128–1132 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222932

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222932

Key word

Navigation