Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular systematics and genetic differentiation of Pinus sylvestris (L.) and P. densiflora (Sieb. et Zucc.)

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Allozyme variation was examined in 22 populations of Pinus densiflora (Sieb, et Zucc.) and four geographic varieties of P. sylvestris (L.): var ‘lapponica’ (Fries, Hartman), var ‘armena’ (Komarov), var ‘mongolica’ (Litvinov) and var ‘sylvestriformis’ (Takenouchi). In addition, we developed paternal chloroplast (cp) DNA markers that distinguish P. densiflora from var ‘lapponica’, var ‘armena’ and var ‘mongolica’. UPGMA cluster analysis based on Nei's distances between all pairwise combinations of the 22 populations revealed patterns corresponding strictly to geographic origin and taxonomic status. Analysis of allozyme variation in var ‘lapponica’, var ‘armena’ and var ‘mongolica’ demonstrated a high level of intrapopulational variability but a low level of interpopulational differentiation. It appears that the late Pleistocene blending of genetically diverse populations was responsible for the observed variation patterns. The constructed phylogenetic trees also showed late divergence of these three varieties. The var ‘sylvestri formis’ was genetically distinct from the other three P. sylvestris varieties. The genetic distances separating var ‘sylvestriformis’ from P. densiflora and the other taxa lend support to a separate taxonomic status for var ‘sylvestriformis’ and a close relation with P. densiflora. We found that var ‘sylvestriformis’ harbors admixtures of allozymes and cpDNA from both P. sylvestris and P. densiflora, which suggests an introgressive nature of this variety. Levels of intrapopulational variability were similar in P. sylvestris and P. densiflora, but interpopulational differentiation was much higher in P. densiflora. In the constructed phylogenetic trees, populations of this species were characterized by relatively long internode distances and branch lengths. The present results suggest that P. densiflora has a more advanced evolutionary age than P. sylvestris.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boratyński A (1991) Range of natural distribution. In: Giertach M, Mátyás C (eds) Genetics of Scots pine. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, pp 19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21:550–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng W-C, Fu L-G (1978) Chinese flora. Sci Press 7:203–280 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng W-C, Fu L-K, Cheng C-Y (1975) Gymnospermae sinicae. Acta Phytotaxon Sinica 13:56–89 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston RC (1971) The estimation of admixture in racial hybrids. Ann Hum Genet 35:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris JS (1972) Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 106:645–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Giertych M (1991) Provenance variation in growth and phenology. In: Giertych M, Mátyás C (eds) Genetics of Scots pine. Akadémiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 87–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1982) Molecular evolution, protein polymorphism and evolutionary theory. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosiński G (1991) Hybridization. In: Giertych M, Mátyás C (eds) Genetics of Scots pine. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, pp 183–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidholm J, Gustafsson P (1991) The chloroplast genome of the gymnosperm Pinus contorta: a physical map and a complete collection of overlapping clones. Curr Genet 20:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JC (1991) Restsite: a phylogenetic program that sorts raw restriction data. J Hered 82:262–263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirov NT (1967) The genus Pinus. The Ronald Press Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotkov PI, Patlaj IN (1991) Systematic position within the genus Pinus and intraspecific taxonomy. In: Giertych M, Mátyás C (eds) Genetics of Scots pine. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, pp 31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Muona O (1990) Population genetics in forest tree improvement. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS (eds) Population genetics, breeding and genetic conservation. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., pp 282–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer JD, Shields CR, Cohen DB, Orton TJ (1983) Chloroplast DNA evolution and the origin of amphidiploid Brassica species. Theor Appl Genet 65:181–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritland K, Eckenwalder JE (1992) Polymorphism, hybridization, and variable evolutionary rate in molecular phylogenies. In: Soltis PL, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ (eds) Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and Hall, New York London, pp 404–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DF, Hiorns RW (1965) Methods of analysis of the genetic composition of hybrid population. Hum Biol 37:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby JL, Wright JW (1976) A revised classification of geographic variation in Scots pine. Silvae Genet 25:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PH, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman and Co, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Son D, Hong S, Yeo J, Ryu J (1989) Genetic variation of isozymes in populations of Pinus densiflora and Pinus thunbergii naturally distributed in Kyungpook province. J Korean For Soc 78:345–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (1981) On the utility of the distance Wagner procedure. Advances in cladistics. In: Funk VA, Brooks DR (eds) Proc 1st Meeting Willie Hennig Soc. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, pp 25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL, Seiander RB (1981) BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J Hered 72:281–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt AE (1984) Genetic studies of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) domestication by means of isozyme analysis. PhD thesis, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt AE (1991) Phylogenetic and applied studies on chloroplast genome in foret conifers. In: Fineschi S, Cannata F, Hattemer HH (eds) Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees. SPB Academic Publ, The Hague, the Netherlands, pp 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt AE, Lidholm J, Hallgren J-E (1986) DNA extraction and preliminary characterization of chloroplast DNA from Pinus sylvestris and Pinus contorta. In: Lindgren D (ed) Proc of the Frans Kempe Symp Provenances Forest Tree Breed for High Latitudes. Umeå, pp 269–280

  • Takenouchi M (1942) A preliminary report on the conifers of Manchukuo. J Jpn For Soc 24:113–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X-R, Szmidt AE (1990) Evolutionary analysis of Pinus densata (Masters), a putative Tertiary hybrid. 2. A study using species-specific chloroplast DNA markers. Theor Appl Genet 80:641–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X-R, Szmidt AE, Lindgren D (1991) Allozyme differentiation among populations of Pinus sylvestris L. from Sweden and China. Hereditas 114:219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler NC, Guries RP (1987) A quantitative measure of introgression between lodgepole and jack pines. Can J Bot 65:1876–1885

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P.M.A. Tigerstedt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szmidt, A.E., Wang, X.R. Molecular systematics and genetic differentiation of Pinus sylvestris (L.) and P. densiflora (Sieb. et Zucc.). Theoret. Appl. Genetics 86, 159–165 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222074

Key words

Navigation