Skip to main content
Log in

The role of proprioception for motor learning in locust flight

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a ‘muscle-specific’ flight simulator (simulator driven by muscle action potentials) locusts (Locusta migratoria) show motor learning by which steering performance of the closed-loop muscles is improved. The role of proprioceptive feedback for this motor learning has been studied. Closed-loop muscles were cut in order to disable proprioceptive feedback of their contractions. Since there are no proprioceptors within the muscles, this is a muscle-specific deafferentation. Cut muscles are still activated during flight and their action potentials can be used for controlling the flight simulator. With cut muscles in closed-loop, steering is less reliable as can be seen from the frequent oscillations of the yaw angle. However, periods of stable flight indicate that ‘deafferented’ muscles are still, in principle, functional for steering. Open-loop yaw stimuli reveal that steering reactions in cut muscles are weaker and have a longer delay than intact muscles. This is responsible for the oscillations observed in closed-loop flight. Intact muscles can take over from cut muscles in order to re-establish stable closed-loop flight. This shows that proprioceptive mechanisms for learning are muscle specific. A hypothetical scheme is presented to explain the role of proprioception for motor learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Büschges A, Pearson K (1991) Adaptive modifications in the flight system of the locust after removal of wing proprioceptors. J Exp Biol 157:313–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg M, Wolf R (1988) Reafferent control of optomotor yaw torque in Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A 163:373–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden CD, Rothwell JC, Day BL (1984) The use of peripheral feedback in the control of movement. Trends Neurosci 7:253–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhl B (1988) Short-term learning during flight control in Locusta migratoria. J Comp Physiol A 163:803–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhl B (1989) ‘Biological noise’ and plasticity of sensorimotor pathways in the locust flight system. J Comp Physiol A 166:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhl B (1991a) Motor learning in the locust flight system requires proprioceptive feedback. Naturwissenschaften 78:84–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhl B (1991b) Simulation of a model for motor learning in locust flight control. In: Elsner N, Penzlin H (eds) Synapse, transmission, modulation. Proceedings of the 19th Göttingen Neurobiology Conference. G Thieme, Stuttgart New York, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhl B, Bacon J (1983) The TCG wind-sensitive interneurone in the locust. II. Directional sensitivity and role in flight stabilisation. J Comp Physiol 150:453–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhl B, Nachtigall W (1978) Proprioceptive input on the locust flight motor revealed by muscle stimulation. J Comp Physiol 128:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez M, Pearson K (1991) Octopaminergic modulation of interneurons in the flight system of the locust. J Neurophysiol 66:1522–1537

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert D (1988) Visual steering under closed-loop conditions by flying locusts: flexibility of optomotor response and mechanisms of correctional steering. J Comp Physiol A 164:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell CHF (1988) Mechanisms of flight steering in locusts. Experientia 44:389–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Schildberger K, Huber F (1988) Post-lesion plasticity in the auditory system of the cricket. In: Flohr H (ed) Post-lesion neural plasticity. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 565–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz B (1989) Neuroplasticity and phonotaxis in monaural adult female crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus de Geer). J Comp Physiol A 164:343–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CP (1981) Contribution of compound eyes and ocelli to steering of locusts in flight. J Exp Biol 93:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Thüring DA (1986) Variability of motor output during flight steering in locusts. J Comp Physiol A 156:655–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf R, Heisenberg M (1990) Visual control of straight flight in Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A 167:269–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf R, Heisenberg M (1991) Basic organization of operant behavior as revealed in Drosophila flight orientation. J Comp Physiol A 169:699–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarnack W, Möhl B (1977a) Activity of the direct down-stroke flight muscles of Locusta migratoria (L.) during steering behaviour in flight I. Patterns of time shift. J Comp Physiol 118:215–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarnack W, Möhl B (1977b) A data aquisition processor with data reduction for electrophysiological experiments. Fortschr Zool 24:321–326

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Möhl, B. The role of proprioception for motor learning in locust flight. J Comp Physiol A 172, 325–332 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216614

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216614

Key words

Navigation