Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of local recurrent disease in musculoskeletal tumors: magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 2 1/2-year prospective study of surgically treated malignant mesenchymal neoplasms showed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to be superior to computed tomography (CT) in sensitivity for local recurrent disease measuring less than 15 cm3. Larger masses were detected with similar sensitivity; specificity and predictive values did not differ. The presence of areas of high signal intensity on T2-weighted images proved to be a reliable criterion except in fibrous neoplasms. However, differentiation between non-hemorrhagic fluid collections, cross-sectioned veins or bowel contents and small tumor nodules cannot be made simply by signal intensity, but has to be based upon the evaluation of gross morphologic criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aisen AM, Martel W, Braunstein EM, McMillin KI, Philips WA, Kling TF (1986) MRI and CT evaluation of primary bone and soft tissue tumors. AJR 146:749

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beltran J, Noto AM, McGhee RB, Freedy RM, McCalla MS (1987) Infections of the musculoskeletal system: High-fieldstrength MR imaging. Radiology 164:449

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beltran J, Noto AM, Chatteries DW, Chakeres AJ (1987) Tumors of the osseous spine. Staging with MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 162:565

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berquist TH, Brown ML, Fitzgerald RH Jr, May GR (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging: Application in musculoskeletal infection. Magn Reson Imaging 3:219

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bohndorf K, Reiser M, Lochner B, de Lacroix WF, Steinbrich W (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging of primary tumours and tumour-like lesions of bone. Skeletal Radiol 15:511

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daffner RH, Lupetin AR, Dash N, Deeb ZL, Sefczek RJ, Schapiro RL (1986) MRI in the detection of malignant infiltration of bone marrow. AJR 146:353

    Google Scholar 

  7. Demas BE, Heelan RT, Lane J, Marcove R, Hajdu S, Murray FB (1988) Soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: Comparison of MR and CT in determining the extent of disease. AJR 150:615

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ehman RL, Berquist TH, McLeod RA (1988) MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system: A 5-year-appraisal. Radiology 166:313

    Google Scholar 

  9. Genant HK, Wilson JS, Bovill EG (1980) Computed tomography of the musculoskeletal system. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 62:1088

    Google Scholar 

  10. Petterson MO, Gillespy T, Hamlin DJ, Enneking WF, Springfield DS, Andrew ER, Spanier SS, Ilone R (1987) Primary musculoskeletal tumors: Examination with MR imaging compared with conventional modalities. Radiology 164:237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Petterson H, Slone RM, Spanier S, Gillespy T III, Fitzsimmons JR, Scott KN (1988) Musculoskeletal tumours: T1 and T2 relaxation times. Radiology 167:783

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reuther G, Mutschler W (1989) Radiomorphologische Klassifikation zentraler Chondrosarkome. Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Nuklearmed Ergänzungsband 150:1

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richardson ML, Kilcoyne RF, Gillespy T III (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal neoplasms. Radiol Clin North Am 24:259

    Google Scholar 

  14. Totty WG, Murphy WA, Lee JKT (1986) Soft tissue tumors: MR imaging. Radiology 160:135

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vanel D, Lacombe MJ, Couanet D, Kalifa C, Spielmann M, Genin J (1987) Musculoskeletal tumors: Follow-up with MR imaging after treatment with surgery and radiation therapy. Radiology 164:243

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wetzel LH, Levine E, Murphey MD (1987) Comparison of MR imaging and CT in the evaluation of musculoskeletal masses. Radiographics 7:851

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zimmer WD, Berquist TH, McLeod RA (1985) Bone tumors: Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography. Radiology 155:709

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reuther, G., Mutschler, W. Detection of local recurrent disease in musculoskeletal tumors: magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol. 19, 85–90 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197611

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197611

Key words

Navigation