Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial orientation of trout to partially polarized light

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The results of this study reveal that rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss formerly Salmo gairdneri) are capable of orienting to polarized light fields, and that the degree of polarization of the polarized light field affects the accuracy of orientation behavior. As previously shown, rainbow trout can accurately orient to a plane polarized light field after several sessions of food-rewarded training. The present data demonstrate that the accuracy of such orientation decreases the degree of polarization of the plane-polarized light field is lowered. In testing sessions, different concentrations of latex beads were introduced into a cuvette positioned below the light source to degrade the degree of polarization. There was evidence that trout could still detect the evector and use it in making orienting responses when the light was only 65% polarized. However, most of the test trout did not demonstrate orienting ability at levels of polarization below the 75% level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor ER, Smith FE (1953) The orientation of Cladocera to polarized light. Am Nat 87:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard GD, Wehner R (1977) Functional similarities between polarization vision and colour vision. Vision Res 17:1019–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill PA (1971) Perception of polarized light by yearling sockeye salmon. J Fish Res Bd Can 28:1319–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot C (1965) On the orientation of young sockeye salmon (Oncorhyncus nerka) during their seaward migration out of the lakes. Behavior [Suppl] 14:198

    Google Scholar 

  • Forward RB, Horch DW, Waterman TH (1972) Visual orientation at the water surface by the teleost Zenarchopterus sp. Biol Bull 143:112–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Forward RB, Waterman TH (1973) Evidence for e-vector and light intensity pattern discrimination by the teleost Dermogenys sp. J Comp Physiol 87:189–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch K von (1949) Die Polarisation des Himmelslichtes als orientierender Faktor bei den Tänzen der Bienen. Experientia 4:142–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW, McFarland WN (1987) Cone photoreceptor mechanisms and the detection of polarized light in fish. J Comp Physiol A 160:459–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryshyn CW, Arnold MG, Bowering E, Cole RL (1990) Spatial orientation of rainbow trout to plane-polarized light: The ontogeny of e-vector discrimination and spectral sensitivity characteristics. J Comp Physiol A 166:565–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanoff A (1974) Polarization measurements in the sea. In: Jerlov NG, Neilsen ES (eds) Optical aspects of oceanography. Academic Press, London, pp 151–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanoff A, Waterman TH (1958) Factors, mainly depth and wavelength, affecting the degree of underwater light polarization. J Mar Res 16:283–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerlov NG (1963) Optical oceanography. Ocean Mar Biol Annu Rev 1:89–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerlov NG (1976) Optical oceanography. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleerekoper H, Matis JH, Timms AM, Gesler P (1973) Locomotor response of the goldfish to polarized light and its e-vector. J Comp Physiol 86:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Konnen GP (1985) Polarized light in nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 172

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreithen ML, Keeton WT (1974) Detection of polarized light by the homing pigeon, Columba livia. J Comp Physiol 89:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythgoe JN (1979) The ecology of vision. Oxford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythgoe JN, Hemming CC (1967). Polarized light and underwater vision. Nature 213:893–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossel S, Wehner R (1986) Polarization vision in bees. Nature (Lond) 323:128–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw SR (1966) Polarized light responses from crab retinula cells. Nature 211:92–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DH, Adler K (1973) Spatial orientation by salamanders using plane polarized light. Science 181:285–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman TH (1975) Natural polarized light and e-vector discrimination by vertebrates. In: Evans GC, Bainbridge R, Rackham O (eds) Light as an ecological factor. Blackwell, Oxford London, pp 305–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman TH, Forward RB (1972) Field demonstration of polarotaxis in the fish Zenarchopterus sp. J Exp Zool 180:33–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1976) Polarized-light navigation by insects. Sci Am 235:106–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolotov V, Frantsevich L (1973) Orientation of bees by the polarized light of a limited area of the sky. J Comp Physiol 85:25–36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawryshyn, C.W., Bolger, A.E. Spatial orientation of trout to partially polarized light. J Comp Physiol A 167, 691–697 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192663

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192663

Key words

Navigation