Skip to main content
Log in

An economic analysis of irrigation systems

  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An array of irrigation systems are available which can be broadly classified as being gravity flow or pressurized. Pressurized irrigation systems provide better control on the amount of applied water and, in most cases, better irrigation uniformity than gravity flow systems. They also have a higher initial capital cost than gravity flow systems and an analysis is required to determine whether the improved performance of pressurized systems justifies the additional costs. An economic analysis was done on several irrigation systems which included consideration of farm management costs associated with a given irrigation system, shifts in crop yield and drainage volumes associated with the optimal management of each irrigation system, and costs associated with disposal of drainage waters. Cotton was selected as the crop for analysis. Irrigation uniformity is a significant determinant to the results. Although irrigation uniformities can be highly variable based on design, maintenance and management, a typical uniformity for each irrigation system was selected. For the conditions of the analysis, gravity flow systems were calculated to be more profitable than pressurized systems if there was no constraint on the amount of drainage water generated or cost for its disposal. Imposition of costs for drainage water disposal induced a shift whereby pressurized systems became more profitable than gravity flow systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • California Cotton Progress Report (1987) University of California and Agricultural Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA

  • Christiansen JE (1942) Irrigation by sprinkling. Calif Agric Exp Sta Bull 670. University of California, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (1983) Trickle irrigation of cotton in California. Western Cotton Production Conference, Las Cruces, NM, pp 34–38

  • Fangmeier DD (1985) Evaluation of low-pressure moving irrigation systems. Paper presented at the 1985 Pacific Region, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan SR, Schwankl LJ, Lanini WT (1988) Weed control by subsurface drip irrigation. Calif Ag 42(3):22

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley D, Vaux Jr. HJ, Pickering N (1983) Evaluating low-volume irrigation systems for emission uniformity. Calif Ag 37(1 and 2):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Jury WA, Russo D, Sposito G, Elabd H (1987) The spatial variability of water and solute transport properties in unsatuated soil. I. Analysis of property variation and spatial structure with statistical models. Hilgardia 55(4):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J (1985) Irrigation uniformity as related to optimum crop production-additional research is needed. Irrig Sci 6:253

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Dinar A (1986) Simulated crop-water production functions for several crops when irrigated with saline waters. Hilgardia 54(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Blair JW, Devitt D, Lund LJ, Nash P (1977) Nitrate-nitrogen in effluent from agricultural tile drains in California. Hilgardia 45(9):289

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Vaux Jr HJ, Feinerman E (1984) Optimum crop water application as affected by uniformity of water infiltration. Agron J 76:435

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Dinar A, Knapp KC (1985) Crop-water production function model for saline irrigation waters. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Roberts C, Penberth M, Vasek C (1986) An Agricultural Dilemma: Drainage Water and Toxics Disposal in the San Joaquin Valley. Special Publ. 3319. Div of Agric and Nat Res, Oakland, CA 94608, 56 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle WM, Bordovsky JP (1981) Low energy precision application (LEPA) irrigation system. Trans ASAE 24:1241

    Google Scholar 

  • State Water Resources Control Board (August 1987) SWRCB Order No. W.Q85-1 Technical Committee Report. Regulation of Agricultural Drainage to the San Joaquin River, Final Report

  • Thompson GT, Spiess LB, Krider JN (1980) Farm resource and system selection. In: Jensen ME (ed) chap 3: Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. Am Soc Agr Eng Monograph, pp 45–73

  • University of California Committee of Consultants (1988) Associated Costs of Drainage Water Reduction. University of California Salinity/Drainage Task Force and University of California Water Resources Center

  • Wallender W (1986) Furrow model with spatially varying infiltration. Trans ASAE 29:1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrick AW (1983) Interrelationships of irrigation uniformity terms. J Irrig Drainage Div ASCE 109:317

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitayew M, Letey J, Vaux Jr HJ, Feinerman E (1985) Factors affecting uniformity and optimal water management with furrow irrigation. Irrig Sci 6:201

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Letey, J., Dinar, A., Woodring, C. et al. An economic analysis of irrigation systems. Irrig Sci 11, 37–43 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189993

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189993

Keywords

Navigation