Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lebenswelt structures of Galilean physics: The case of Galileo's pendulum

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to give a self-reflective account of the building of Galileo's pendulum in order to discover what were the practical contingencies of building and using the pendulum for demonstrating the law of isochronism. In doing this, the unique Lebenswelt structures of “Galilean physics” are explicated through the ethnomethodological concepts developed by Harold Garfinkel. The presupposition is that the practical logic of “Galilean physics” is embedded in the instruments themselves. In building the pendulum and recovering its original use, “Galilean physics” becomes for ethnomethodologists a first-hand practical discovery. This is not a reconstruction of the mind of the historical Galileo but, rather, an explication of Galileo's practical perspective on the instrument as an intersubjective and interchangeable standpoint available for ethnomethodological analysis. This enables us to study historical facts from the standpoint of the practical logic of the original practice with a pedagogical eye for the instructive reproducibility of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, G.P. and Hacker, P.M. (1985). Wittgenstein—Rules, Grammar and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagioli, M. (1990). Galileo the Emblem Maker. ISIS 81: 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biagioli, M. (1993). Galileo Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjelic, D. (1992). The Praxiological Validity of Natural Scientific Practices as a Criterion for Identifying Their Unique Social-object Character: The Case of the ‘Authentication’ of Goethe's Morphological Theorem. Qualitative Sociology 3: 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjelic, D. (1995). An Ethnomethodological Clarification of Husserl's Concepts of “regressive inquiry;” and “Galilean physics” by Means of Discovering Praxioms. Human Studies 18: 189–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjelic, D. and Lynch, M. (1992). The Work of [Scientific] Demonstration, Respecifying Newton's and Goethe's Theories of Prismatic Color. In G. Watson and R.M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in Context. London: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R.G. (1957). The Idea of History. Oxford: A Galaxy Book, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M. (1985). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. and Parsons, E.D. (1990). The Praxiology of Perception: Visual Orientation and Practical Action. Inquiry 33: 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978). Edmund Husserl's Origin of Geometry: An Introduction. Boulder, CO: Nicolas Hays Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. (1975). The Role of Music in Galileo's Experiments. Scientific American 6:98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. (1981). Galileo at work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method. London: NLB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo, G. (1974). Two new sciences. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo, G. (1967). Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems — Ptolomeic and Copernican. Berkely: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. (1987). How Experiments End. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1989). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1991). Respecification: Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order,* Logic, Reason, Meaning, Method, etc. in and as of the Essential Haecceity of Immortal Ordinary Society, (I)—an Announcement of Studies. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, pp. 10–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M. and Livingston, E. (1981). The Work of Discovering Sciences Constructed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 131–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., et al. (1988). Respecifying the Natural Sciences as Discovering Sciences of Practical Action, I & II: Doing so Ethnographically by Administering a Schedule of Contingencies in Discussion with Laboratory Scientists and by Hanging Around Their Laboratories. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Gooding, D. (1992). Mathematics and Method in Faraday's Experiments. Unpublished manuscript. Gurwitsch, A. (1974).

  • Gurwitsch, A. (1974) Phenomenology and the Theory of Science. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitsch, A. (1988). Galilean Physics in the Light of Husserl's Phenomenology. In E. McMullin (Ed.), Galileo Man of Science. Princeton, NJ: The Scholar's Bookshelf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1967). What Is a Thing?. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (1994). Pendulums and Planes: What Galileo Didn't Publish. Nuncius 9: 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunson, N.R. (1969). Perception and Discovery: An Introduction to Scientific Inquiry. Freeman, Cooper & Company.

  • Hunter, J.F.M. (1973). Essays after Wittgenstein. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwest University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, L.R. and Martin, M.J. (1942). A Laboratory Manual ofExperiments in Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, E. (1958). Critique ofPure Reason. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelman, J.J. and Kisiel J.T. (1970). Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyre, A. (1968). Metaphysics and Measurement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyre, A. (1978). Galileo Studies. NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: the [Social] Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, E. (1986). The Ethnomethodological Foundation of Mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, E. (1993). The Disciplinarity of Knowledge at the Mathematics-physics Interference. In E. Messer-Davidow et al. (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1985). Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science. London: Routledge & Paul Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1991). Method: Measurement — Ordinary and Scientific Measurement as Ethnomethodological Phenomena. In G. Button (Ed.) Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action — Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., Livingston, E. and Garfinkel, H. (1983). Temporal Order in Laboratory Work. In Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science Observed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macomber, W.B. (1967) The Anatomy of Disillusion. Evanston: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E. (1988). Galileo Man of Science. Princeton: The Scholar's Bookshelf.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLachlan, J. (1976). Galileo's Experiments with Pendulumd: Real and Imaginary. Annals of Science 33:173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1983). Philosophical Papers 1913–1946. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, DNY: A Doubleday Anchor Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponty, M.M. (1967). Phenomenology ofPerception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1948). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarton, G. (1948). The Life of Science. New York: Henry Schuman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, S. (1989). Glass Works: Newton's Prisms and the Uses of Experiment. In D. Gooding et al. (Eds.), The Use of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1994). A Social History of Truth. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1973). Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. and Luckman, T. (1989). The Structure of the Life-world, vol. II. Evanston: North-western University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough. Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminology, University of Southern Maine, 04103, Portland, ME, USA

    Dušan I. Bjelic

Authors
  1. Dušan I. Bjelic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I would like to thank Mike Lynch, Eric Livingston, Jim MacLachlan, and Shelley Schweizer-Bjelic for their comments

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bjelic, D.I. Lebenswelt structures of Galilean physics: The case of Galileo's pendulum. Hum Stud 19, 409–432 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188851

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188851

Keywords

Search

Navigation