Skip to main content

John Philoponus

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Abstract

John Philoponus was a sixth-century commentator on Aristotle who lived between 490–570 CE. “John” was his Christian name, while “Philoponus” was a nickname given to him by various philosophers (which literally means “lover of work”), though he much preferred “the Grammarian.” Philosophically, Philoponus was perhaps the most brilliant of all the Ancient Commentators, developing some of the most stinging criticisms of Aristotelianism in history. He disagreed with Aristotle on such important matters as dynamics, optics, the existence of void, and the need for a fifth element. These criticisms in turn gave rise to a series of innovative ideas, placing Philoponus among the important scientific thinkers of Late antiquity. His religious beliefs were no less radical and controversial, which eventually led him to be condemned posthumously in 680 CE by the Third Council of Constantinople. This entry examines Philoponus’ most sustained attacks on Aristotelian science, including Aristotle’s position on motion, prime matter, space, and void.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Philoponus. (1887–1888). On Aristotle on physics (ed.: Vitelli, H.) CAG XVI – XVII. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philoponus. (1897a). On Aristotle on the soul (ed.: Hayduck, M.) CAG XV. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philoponus. (1897b). On Aristotle on generation and corruption (ed.: Vitelli, H.) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca [CAG] vol XIV 2. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philoponus. (1898). On Aristotle on categories (ed.: Busse, A.) CAG XIII 1. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philoponus. (1987). Against Aristotle on the eternity of the world (trans.: Wildberg, C.). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philoponus. (1991). Corollaries on place and void (trans.: Furley, D. with Simplicius); Against Philoponus on the eternity of the world (trans.: Wildberg, C.). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philoponus. (2005). Against Proclus on the eternity of the world 1–5 & 6–8 (trans.: Share, M.). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philoponus. (2006). Against Proclus on the eternity of the world 12–18 (trans.: Wilberding, J.). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Adamson, P. (2006). Vision, light and colour in Al-Kindi, Ptolemy and the ancient commentators. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 16, 207–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, J. (1991). Aristotle and Philoponus on light. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, F. (1997). John Philoponus’ new definition of prime matter. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco, A. B. (2003). Avempace, projectile motion, and impetus theory. Journal of the History of Ideas, 64(4), 521–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCoull, L. S. B. (1995). Another look at the career of John Philoponus. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 3(1), 269–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCoull, L. S. B. (2006). The historical context of John Philoponus’ De opificio mundi in the culture of Byzantine-Coptic Egypt. Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum, 9(2), 397–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambursky, S. (1958). Philoponus’ interpretation of Aristotle’s theory of light. Osiris, 13(1), 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedley, D. (1987). Philoponus’ conception of space. In R. Sorabji (Ed.), Philoponus and the rejection of Aristotelian science (pp. 140–153). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. (Ed.). (1987). Philoponus and the rejection of Aristotelian science (2nd ed.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Bull Inst Class Stud, supp. vol 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. (1988). Matter, space and motion. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. (1990). Aristotle transformed: The ancient commentators and their influence. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. (1991). From Aristotle to Brentano: The development of the concept of intentionality. In: Aristotle and the later tradition (Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. supp vol 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. (2005a). The philosophy of the commentators (200–600 AD): A sourcebook vol 1: Physics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. (2005b). Sordid deals and divine names in ammonius’ Alexandria. In A. Smith (Ed.), The philosopher and society in late antiquity. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrycken, K. (1990). The development of Philoponus’ thought and its chronology. In R. Sorabji (Ed.), Aristotle transformed (pp. 233–274). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildberg, C. (1988). John Philoponus’ criticism of Aristotle’s theory of aether. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, M. (1990). Philoponus and the rise of preclassical dynamics. In R. Sorabji (Ed.), Aristotle transformed (pp. 84–120).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Henry, D. (2020). John Philoponus. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_278

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics