Abstract
John Philoponus was a sixth-century commentator on Aristotle who lived between 490–570 CE. “John” was his Christian name, while “Philoponus” was a nickname given to him by various philosophers (which literally means “lover of work”), though he much preferred “the Grammarian.” Philosophically, Philoponus was perhaps the most brilliant of all the Ancient Commentators, developing some of the most stinging criticisms of Aristotelianism in history. He disagreed with Aristotle on such important matters as dynamics, optics, the existence of void, and the need for a fifth element. These criticisms in turn gave rise to a series of innovative ideas, placing Philoponus among the important scientific thinkers of Late antiquity. His religious beliefs were no less radical and controversial, which eventually led him to be condemned posthumously in 680 CE by the Third Council of Constantinople. This entry examines Philoponus’ most sustained attacks on Aristotelian science, including Aristotle’s position on motion, prime matter, space, and void.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Philoponus. (1887–1888). On Aristotle on physics (ed.: Vitelli, H.) CAG XVI – XVII. Berlin: Reimer.
Philoponus. (1897a). On Aristotle on the soul (ed.: Hayduck, M.) CAG XV. Berlin: Reimer.
Philoponus. (1897b). On Aristotle on generation and corruption (ed.: Vitelli, H.) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca [CAG] vol XIV 2. Berlin: Reimer.
Philoponus. (1898). On Aristotle on categories (ed.: Busse, A.) CAG XIII 1. Berlin: Reimer.
Philoponus. (1987). Against Aristotle on the eternity of the world (trans.: Wildberg, C.). London: Duckworth.
Philoponus. (1991). Corollaries on place and void (trans.: Furley, D. with Simplicius); Against Philoponus on the eternity of the world (trans.: Wildberg, C.). London: Duckworth.
Philoponus. (2005). Against Proclus on the eternity of the world 1–5 & 6–8 (trans.: Share, M.). London: Duckworth.
Philoponus. (2006). Against Proclus on the eternity of the world 12–18 (trans.: Wilberding, J.). London: Duckworth.
Secondary Sources
Adamson, P. (2006). Vision, light and colour in Al-Kindi, Ptolemy and the ancient commentators. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 16, 207–236.
de Groot, J. (1991). Aristotle and Philoponus on light. New York: Garland.
de Haas, F. (1997). John Philoponus’ new definition of prime matter. Leiden: Brill.
Franco, A. B. (2003). Avempace, projectile motion, and impetus theory. Journal of the History of Ideas, 64(4), 521–546.
MacCoull, L. S. B. (1995). Another look at the career of John Philoponus. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 3(1), 269–279.
MacCoull, L. S. B. (2006). The historical context of John Philoponus’ De opificio mundi in the culture of Byzantine-Coptic Egypt. Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum, 9(2), 397–423.
Sambursky, S. (1958). Philoponus’ interpretation of Aristotle’s theory of light. Osiris, 13(1), 114–126.
Sedley, D. (1987). Philoponus’ conception of space. In R. Sorabji (Ed.), Philoponus and the rejection of Aristotelian science (pp. 140–153). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Sorabji, R. (Ed.). (1987). Philoponus and the rejection of Aristotelian science (2nd ed.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Bull Inst Class Stud, supp. vol 2008.
Sorabji, R. (1988). Matter, space and motion. London: Duckworth.
Sorabji, R. (1990). Aristotle transformed: The ancient commentators and their influence. London: Duckworth.
Sorabji, R. (1991). From Aristotle to Brentano: The development of the concept of intentionality. In: Aristotle and the later tradition (Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. supp vol 1991).
Sorabji, R. (2005a). The philosophy of the commentators (200–600 AD): A sourcebook vol 1: Physics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Sorabji, R. (2005b). Sordid deals and divine names in ammonius’ Alexandria. In A. Smith (Ed.), The philosopher and society in late antiquity. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.
Verrycken, K. (1990). The development of Philoponus’ thought and its chronology. In R. Sorabji (Ed.), Aristotle transformed (pp. 233–274). London: Duckworth.
Wildberg, C. (1988). John Philoponus’ criticism of Aristotle’s theory of aether. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Wolff, M. (1990). Philoponus and the rise of preclassical dynamics. In R. Sorabji (Ed.), Aristotle transformed (pp. 84–120).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Henry, D. (2020). John Philoponus. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_278
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_278
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1663-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1665-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities