Skip to main content
Log in

Chirurgische Therapie des proximalen Gallengangkarzinoms

Surgical treatment of proximal bile duct cancer

  • Published:
Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

During the past 13 years a total of 60 patients (33 male, 27 female, median age 64.8 years) were operated upon and 21 of these patients underwent resection with a resectability rate of 35%. The remaining 39 patients had a palliative procedure. In 7 patients some form of bypass procedure was performed. 25 patients underwent some form of drainage procedure and in 7 patients only an explorative laparotomy was undertaken. Patients having resection surgery had a postoperative complication rate of 29% and there were 2 postoperative deaths (9.5%). The complication rate in the palliation group was 38%. The mean survival time in patients operated on with surgical resection was 34.1 months, palliative procedures 4.8 months and in patients with nonresectable tumors 3.6 months. In the resection group (n = 21) curative resection (= R0-resection) was performed in 14 patients, whereas in 7 patients there was a histologically invasion of the bile duct (= R0-resection). The mean survival time in the R0-group was 45.7 months and 11.8 months in the R1-group (Breslow p < 0.0098, Mantel-Cox p < 0.0070). we conclude that radical surgical resection offers the best possibility of prolonged survival with a good quality of life in patients with hilar cancer.

Zusammenfassung

Von 1977 bis 1989 werden 60 Patienten (33 Männer, 27 Frauen mit einem Durchschnittsalter von 64,8 Jahren) an der I. Chirurgischen Universitätsklinik in Wien operiert. 21 Bifurkationskarzinome konnten reseziert werden, das entspricht einer Resektionsrate von 35%. Bei 32 Patienten wurde eine Palliation und bei 7 eine Explorativ-Laparotomie durchgeführt. Die Komplikationsrate in der operablen Gruppe betrug 29%. 2 Patienten sind postoperativ verstorben, das entspricht einer Letalitätsrate von 9,5%. Die Komplikationsrate in der Gruppe der palliativ behandelten Gruppe war 38%. Die mittlere Überlebenszeit nach chirurgischer Resektion betrug 34,1 Monate, nach palliativer Maßnahme 4,8 Monate und nach Exploration 3,6 Monate. In der resezierten Gruppe (n = 21) waren in 14 Fällen kurative Resektionen (RO-Resektion) möglich, während in 7 Fällen eine histologische Tumorinfiltration am Resektat vorlag (R1-Resektion). Die mittlere Überlebenszeit in der R0-Gruppe betrug 45,7 Monate und 11,8 Monate in der R1-Gruppe (Breslow p < 0,009, Mantel-Cox p < 0,0070). Eine Verbesserung der Prognose und eine Verbesserung der Lebensqualität beim primären Karzinom der Hepaticusgabel kann neben einer Früherkennung nur durch die radikale Resektion erreicht werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Alexander F, Rossi R, O'Bryan M, Khettry U, Braasch JW, Watkins E (1984) Biliary carcinoma. Am J Surg 147: 503–509

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altemeier WA, Gall EA, Zinninger MM, Hoxworth PI (1957) Sclerosing carcinoma of the major intrahepatic bile ducts. Arch Surg 75:450–461

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bismuth H, Corlette MB (1975) Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:170–178

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bismuth H, Castaing D, Traynor O (1988) Resection or palliation. Priority of surgery in the treatment of hilar cancer. World J Surg 12:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blumgart LH, Benjamin IS, Hadjis NS, Beazley R (1984) Surgical approaches to cholangiocarcinoma at the confluence of the hepatic ducts. Lancet 1:66–70

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron JL, Broe P, Zuidema GD (1982) Proximal bile duct tumors. Surgical management with silastic transhepatic biliary stents. Ann Surg 196:412–419

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dudley SE, Edis AJ, Adson MA (1979) Biliary decompression in hilar obstruction. Arch Surg 114:519–522

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iwasaki Y, Okamura T, Ozalki A, Todoroki T, Takase Y, Ohara K (1986) Surgical treatment for carcinoma at the confluence of the major hepatic ducts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162:457–464

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Non-parametic estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klatskin G (1965) Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. Am J Med 38:241–256

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kremer B, Henne-Bruns D, Soehendra N, Grimm H, Pieper F (1988) Zur Problematik der chirurgischen Therapie des Hepaticusgabelcarcinoms. Chirurg 59:472–477

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kremer B, Henne-Bruns D, Grimm H (1990) Prinzipien der chirurgischen Behandlung von proximalen Gallengangkarzinomen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 115:863–867

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lai E, Tompkins R, Roslyn J, Hann L (1987) Proximal bile duct cancer. Quality of survival. Ann Surg 205:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  14. Launois G, Campion JP, Brisset P, Gosseling M (1979) Carcinoma of the hepatic hilus: surgical treatment and the case for resection. Ann Surg 190:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lygidakis NJ (1987) Kombinierte Rekonstruktion der Gallengänge und Lebergefäße bei Carcinomen der Hepaticusgabel. Chirurg 58:282–285

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lygidakis NJ, van der Heyde MN, Houthoff J (1988) Surgical approaches to the management of primary biliary cholangiocarcinoma of the porta hepatis. The decision-making dilemma. Hepatogastroenterology 35:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  17. Malchow-Möller A, Matzen P, Bjerregaard B et al (1981) Causes and characteristics of 500 consecutive cases of jaundice. Scand J Gastroenterol 16:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  18. Malt RA, Warshaw AL, Jamieson CG, Hawk JC (1980) Left intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy for proximal obstruction of the biliary tract. Surg Gynecol Obstet 150:193–197

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chem Rep 50:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mizumoto R, Kawarda Y, Suzuki H (1986) Surgical treatment of hilar carcinoma of the bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162:153–158

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pichlmayr R, Ringe B, Lauchart W Bechstein WO, Gubernatis G, Wagner E (1988) Radical resection and liver grafting as the two main components of surgical strategy in the treatment of proximal bile duct cancer. World J Surg 12:68–77

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pinson CW, Rossi RL (1988) Extended right hepatic lobectomy, left hepatic lobectomy, and skeletization for proximal bile duct cancer. World J Surg 12:52–56

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ringe B, Wittekind C, Bechstein WO, Bunzendahl H, Pichlmayr R (1989) The role of liver transplantation in hepatobiliary malignancy. Ann Surg 209:88–98

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schriefers KH, Smague E (1984) Operationstechniken bei Neoplasien der proximalen Gallenwege. Chirurg 55:787–793

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tompkins RK, Thomas D, Wile A, Longmire WP Jr (1981) Prognostic factors in bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 194:447–457

    Google Scholar 

  26. White TT (1988) Skeletization resection and central hepatic resection in the treatment of bile duct cancer. World J Surg 12:48–51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teleky, B., Funovics, J.M., Herbst, F. et al. Chirurgische Therapie des proximalen Gallengangkarzinoms. Langenbecks Arch Chir 376, 286–290 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188269

Key words

Navigation