Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of haloperidol and d-amphetamine on perceived quantity of foods and tones

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hypothesis that dopamine (DA) receptor agonists and antagonists affect “hedonia” associated with natural rewards was tested, using a psychophysical procedure previously shown to be sensitive to both the sweetness of food and the motivational state of rats. Rats were first trained to discriminate between two different quantities of a rewarding stimulus by pressing one of two levers. Perceived quantity was subsequently derived from generalization trials of intermediate quantities. Haloperidol (0.03–0.083 mg/kg), a DA receptor antagonist, did not influence perceived food quantity, an indirect marker of hedonic value. On the other hand, d-amphetamine (0.25–1.0 mg/kg) affected perceived food quantity in a dose-dependent fashion, and in the same direction as occurs after increasing hunger or food sweetness. Both haloperidol and amphetamine influenced the perceived quantity of a stimulus without natural reinforcing properties (a tone), but the effect of amphetamine on the perceived quantity of this initially neutral stimulus was opposite in direction to that observed with food. These results suggest that whereas amphetamine affects hedonic processes, haloperidol does not. In addition, it seems that haloperidol probably produces its actions through effects on motor mechanisms or by interfering with the response-facilitating properties of rewards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beninger RJ (1982) A comparison of the effects of pimozide and non-reinforcement on discriminated operant responding in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 16:667–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Church RM, Meck WH (1984) The numerical attribute of stimuli. In: Roitblat HL, Bever TG, Terrace HS (eds) Animal cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 445–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Clody DE, Carlton PL (1980) Stimulus efficacy, chlorpromazine and schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology 69:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews PB, Morse WH (1961) Behavioral Pharmacology. Annu Rev Pharmacol 1:145–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A, Koob GF, Bloom FE (1981) Response artifact in the measurement of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia. Science 209:357–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1983) Dissociable effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and alpha-flupenthixol on choice and rate measures of reinforcement in the rat. Psychopharmacology 79:180–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Faustman WO, Fowler SC (1981) Use of response duration to distinguish the effects of haloperidol from nonreward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:327–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibiger HC, Zis AP, Phillips AG (1975) Haloperidol induced disruption of conditioned avoidance responding: attenuation by prior training or by anticholinergic drugs. Eur J Pharmacol 30:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouriezos G, Wise RA (1976) Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits. Brain Res 103:377–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin KBJ (1978) Catecholamines and self-stimulation: reward and performance deficits dissociated. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:813–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin KBJ, McCoy SN (1979) Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:71–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Karras D (1984) Pimozide and d-amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramling SE, Fowler SC, Collins KR (1984) Some effects of pimozide on nondeprived rats licking sucrose solutions in an anhedonia paradigm. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21:617–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray T, Wise RA (1980) Effects of pimozide on lever-pressing behavior maintained on an intermittent reinforcement schedule. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:931–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenshaw AJ, Sanger DJ, Blackman DE (1981) The effects of pimozide and of reward omission on fixed-interval behavior of rats maintained by food and electrical brain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:227–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman GM (1983) A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and d-amphetamine. J Exp Anal Behav 40:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman GM, Kinzie DL, Seiden LS (1986) Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance. Psychopharmacology 88:346–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RT (1970) Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism of psychomotor stimulation. In: Costa E, Garattini S (eds) Amphetamines and related compounds. Raven, New York, pp 781–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin J, Tombaugh TN, Zacharko RM, Anisman H (1983) Alteration of exploration and the response to food associated cues after treatment with pimozide. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:235–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Maricq AV, Church RW (1983) The differential effects of haloperidol and methamphetamine of time estimation in the rat. Psychopharmacology 79:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Maricq AV, Roberts S, Church RW (1981) Methamphetamine and time estimation. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 7:18–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Iverson MT, Fibiger HC, Wilkie, DM (1987) Alteration in the perception of food quantity by rats induced by manipulations of hunger and food sweetness. Learn Motiv

  • Mason ST, Beninger RJ, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1980) Pimozide-induced suppression of responding: evidence against a block of food reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:917–923

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall RB, Appelbaum MI (1973) Bias in the analysis of repeated-measures designs: some alternative approaches. Child Dev 44:401–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley MJ, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1984) The effect of pimozide on variable-interval performance: a test of the “anhedonia” hypothesis of the mode of action of neuroleptics. Psychopharmacology 84:531–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley MJ, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1985) The effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour maintained under variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 87:207–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1979) Decreased resistance to extinction after haloperidol: implications for the role of dopamine in reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 10:751–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW (1975) The potentiation of conditioned reinforcement by psychomotor stimulant drugs: a test of Hill's hypothesis. Psychopharmacology 45:103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW, Watson BA, Gaskin M, Ennis C (1983) Contrasting interactions of pipradol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 80:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamone JD (1986) Differential effects of haloperidol and extinction on instrumental behaviours. Psychopharmacology 88:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Spetch ML, Treit D (1984) The effect of d-amphetamine on short-term memory for time in pigeons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21:663–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Stellar JR, Kelly AE, Corbett D (1983) Effects of peripheral and central dopamine blockade on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation: evidence for both reward and motor deficits. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:433–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Szostak C, Tombaugh TN, Tombaugh J (1981) Examination of the effects of pimozide on two conditional discrimination problems differing in levels of task complexity. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol 5:615–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JR, Robbins TW (1984) Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 84:405–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN (1981) Effects of pimozide on nondiscriminated and discriminated performance in the pigeon. Psychopharmacology 73:137–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN, Ritch MA, Shepherd DT (1980) Effects of pimozide on accuracy of performance and distribution of correct responding on a simultaneous discrimination task in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13:859–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN, Szostak C, Mills P (1983) Failure of pimozide to disrupt the acquisition of light-dark and spatial discrimination problems. Psychopharmacology 79:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5:39–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Spindler J, DeWit H, Gerber GJ (1978) Neuroleptic-induced “anhedonia” in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food. Science 201:262–264

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neurological Sciences, University of British Columbia, V6T 1W5, Vancouver, B.C., Canada

    M. T. Martin-Iverson & H. C. Fibiger

  2. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, V6T 1W5, Vancouver, B.C., Canada

    D. Wilkie

Authors
  1. M. T. Martin-Iverson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Wilkie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. C. Fibiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin-Iverson, M.T., Wilkie, D. & Fibiger, H.C. Effects of haloperidol and d-amphetamine on perceived quantity of foods and tones. Psychopharmacology 93, 374–381 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187260

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187260

Key words

Search

Navigation