Skip to main content
Log in

Intravenous cefazolin in penetrating eye injuries

I. Effects of trauma and multiple doses on intraocular delivery

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The poor intraocular penetration of systemically administered antibiotics has raised questions regarding their usefulness as prophylactic agents in the management of penetrating eye injuries. Cefazolin was administered intravenously to rabbits with penetrating eye injuries to determine the influence of trauma on ocular pharmacokinetics. Following a standardized penetrating eye injury in 27 New Zealand white rabbits, animals were divided into three groups that received either three, six, or nine doses of intravenous cefazolin every 8 h. Cefazolin levels were then measured in the traumatized eye, the non-traumatized (control) fellow eye, and in the serum of each animal. In the three treatment groups vitreous concentrations of cefazolin were significantly higher in traumatized eyes than in the non-injured eyes. After three doses, vitreous concentrations of cefazolin in traumatized eyes averaged 9.1 mg/l; mean concentrations of cefazolin in non-injured eyes were 0.6 mg/l (P < 0.0002). After six doses of intravenous cefazolin, vitreous concentrations in traumatized eyes averaged 7.3 mg/l; cefazolin levels in non-injured eyes were 0.6 mg/l in the non-traumatized eyes (P < 0.0005). After nine doses, vitreous cefazolin concentrations in traumatized eyes averaged 9.7 mg/l, while mean levels in the non-traumatized eyes were all 0.05 mg/l (P < 0.0002).

This work suggests that penetrating injuries of the eye alter ocular pharmacokinetics, resulting in high intraocular concentrations of systemically administered cefazolin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abel R Jr, Boyle GL, Furman M, Leopoldl (1974) Intraocular penetration of cefazolin sodium in rabbits. Am J Ophthalmol 78:779–787

    Google Scholar 

  2. Affeldt JC Flynn HW Jr, Forster RK, Mandelbaum S, Clarkson JG, Jarus GD (1987) Microbial endophthalmitis resulting from ocular trauma. Ophthalmology 94:407–413

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alfaro DV, Pince K, Park J, Runyan T, Ryan SJ, Liggett PE (1992) Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in penetrating ocular injuries; an experimental study. Retina 12:S3-S6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Axelrod JL, Klein RM, Bergen RL, Sheikh MZ (1985) Human vitreous levels of selected antistaphylococcal antibiotics. Am J Ophthalmol 100:570–575

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barza M, Kane E, Baum J (1983) Pharmacokinetics of intravitreal carbenicillin, cefazolin and gentamicin in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:1602–1607

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brinton GS, Topping TM, Hyndiuk RA, Aaberg TM, Reeser FH, Abrams GW (1984) Posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 102:547–550

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clearly PE, Ryan SJ (1979) Method of production and natural history of experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rhesus monkey. Am J Ophthalmol 88:212–220

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ficker LA, Meredith TA, Gardner SK, Wilson LA (1990) Cefazolin levels after intravitreal injection. Effects of inflammation and surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:501–505

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gardner SK (1987) Ocular drug penetration and pharmacokinetic principles. In: Lamberts DW, Potter DE (ed) Clinical ophthalmic pharmacology. Little, Brown, Boston, pp 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glasser DB, Hyndiuk RA (1987) Ocular penetration of antibiotics. In: Lamberts D.W., Potter D.E. (eds) Clinical ophthalmic pharmacology. Little, Brown, Boston, pp 525–566

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gregor Z, Ryan SJ (1982) Blood-retinal barrier after blunt trauma to the eye. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 219:205–208

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kervick GN, Flynn HW, Alfonso E, Miller D (1990) Antibiotic therapy for Bacillus species infections. Am J Ophthalmol 110:683–687

    Google Scholar 

  13. Latanza L, Alfaro DV, Bockman B, Iwamoto T, Heinemann MH, Chang S (1988) Leukotrienes levels in the aqueous humor following experimental ocular trauma. Retina 8:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leeds NH, Peyman GA, House B (1987) Moxalactam (Moxam) in the treatment of experimental staphylococcal endophthalmitis. Ophthalmic Surg 13:653–656

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martin DF, Ficker LA, Aguilar HA, Gardner SK, Wilson LA, Meredith TA (1990) Vitreous cefazolin levels after intravenous injection: effects of inflammation, repeated antibiotic doses, and surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 108:411–414

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parrish CM, O'Day DM (1987) Traumatic endophthalmitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 27:112–119

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peyman GA, Carroll PC, Raichand M (1980) Prevention and management of traumatic endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 87:320–324

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quintiliani R, French M, Nightingale CH (1982) First and second generation cephalosporins. Med Clin North Am 66:183–197

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spalding SC, Sternberg P (1990) Controversies in the management of posterior segment ocular trauma. Retina 10:S76-S82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alfaro, D.V., Liggett, P.E. Intravenous cefazolin in penetrating eye injuries. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232, 238–241 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184012

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184012

Keywords

Navigation