Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of stereotyped behaviour in Mastomys natalensis

  • Published:
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The stereotyped behaviour was analysed in Mastomys natalensis, a species of desert rat recently introduced in laboratory practice. The components of stereotyped behaviour were similar to rat characterised by repetitive sniffing, rearing, licking, head movements and biting. Apomorphine (0.5–2.0 mg/kg), amphetamine (2.5–10 mg/kg), methylphenidate (10 – 30 mg/kg) and adamantanamine (10 – 50 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally, induced stereotyped behaviour in dose-dependent manner. Positive response was also obtained by other drugs acting on dopamine receptors like 1-dopa, GBR 12909, piribedil, tyramine, BS 9648, BS 9641 and BS 8824. Yohimbine (2 mg/kg) failed to produce any response. Apomorphine (2 mg/kg), amphetamine (10 mg/kg), methylphenidate (30 mg/kg) and piribedil (12 mg/kg) induced stereotypy which could be blocked by dopamine receptor blockers haloperidol (1 mg/kg) or pimozide (1 mg/kg) but yohimbine (2 mg/kg) an alpha adrenoceptor blocker was ineffective. Adamantanamine, piribedil and GBR 12909 enhanced the stereotypy induced by low doses of apomorphine, amphetamine and methylphenidate. The data shows that the stereotyped behaviour in Mastomys natalensis is mediated through dopaminergic mechanisms. It appears that both excitatory and inhibitory types of dopamine receptors are involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Browne RG, Segal DS (1977) Metabolic and experimental factors in the behavioural response to repeated amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:545–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson KG, Almasi J (1978) Sensitivity to apomorphine in the guinea pig as function of age and body weight. Psychopharmacology 57:279–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Cools AR, Van Rossum JM (1970) Caudate dopamine and stereotyped behaviour of cats. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 187:163–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Cools AR, Van Rossum JM (1976) Excitation mediating and inhibition mediating dopamine receptors, a new concept towards a better understanding of electrophysiological, biochemical, pharmacological, functional and clinical data. Psychopharmacology 45:243–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Cools AR, Van Rossum JM (1980) Mini review: Multiple receptors for brain dopamine in behavioural regulation: concept of dopamine E and dopamine I receptors. Life Sci 27:1237–1253

    Google Scholar 

  • Costall B, Naylor RJ (1973) On the mode of action of apomorphine. Eur J Pharmaco1 21:350–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Costall B, Naylor RJ (1974) Stereotyped and circling behaviour induced by dopamine agonists after lesion of the midbrain raphe nuclei. Eur J Pharmaco1 29:206–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Costall B, Naylor RJ, Cannon JG, Lee T (1977) Differentiation of the dopamine mechanisms mediating stereotyped behaviour and hyperactivity in the nucleus accumbens and caudate putamen. J Pharm Pharmacol 29:337–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhawan BN, Patnaik GK (1976) Evidence for non-dopaminergic nature of apomorphine induced pecking in pigeons. In: Bradley PB, Dhawan BN (eds) Drugs and central synaptic transmission. MacMillan, London, pp 301–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhawan BN, Srimal RC (1977) Drug induced stereotyped behaviour in guinea pig. In: Subramanyam S (ed) Neurohumoral correlates of behaviour. Thompson Press, Faridabad, pp 153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish CT (1983) Piribedil: Behavioural, neurochemical and clinical profile of a dopamine agonist. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiat 7:3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Durcan MJ, Fulker DW, Campbell IC (1984) Differences in the stereotypy response but not the motility response to apomorphine in the Roman high and Roman low avoiding strains of rats. Psychopharmacology 82:215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Einon DF, Sahakian BJ (1979) Environmentally induced differences in susceptibility of rats to CNS stimulants and CNS depressants: Evidence against a unitary explanation. Psychopharmacology 61:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst AM (1967) Mode of action of apomorphine and dexamphetamine on gnawing compulsion in rats. Psychopharmacology 10:316–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst AM, Smelik P (1966) Site of action of dopamine and apomorphine in compulsive gnawing behaviour in rats. Experientia 22:837–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Frommel ED (1965) The cholinergic mechanism of psychomotor agitation in apomorphine injected mice. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 154:231–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman I, Zacny J, Osman A, Azzaro A, Donovan C (1983) Dopaminergic nature of feeding induced behavioural stereotypies in stressed pigeons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18: 153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Grelak RP, Clark R, Stump JM, Vernier VG (1970) Amantadinedopamine interactions: Possible mode of action in Parkinsonism. Science 169:203–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati A, Dhawan BN (1984) Classification of central dopamine receptors. Ind J Pharmacol 16:182–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati A, Srimal RC, Dhawan KN, Dhawan BN (1987) On the mechanism of potentiation of apomorphine-induced stereotypy due to electroconvulsive shock. Neuropharmacology 26: 1733–1737

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati A, Hussain G, Srimal RC, Dhawan BN (1988) Comparison of cortical adrenergic, cholinergic and benzodiazepine receptors between albino rat and desert rat (Mastomys natalensis) using radioreceptor binding. Pharmacology (in press)

  • Hackman R, Pentikainen P, Neuvonen PJ, Vapaatalo H (1973) Inhibition of the apomorphine gnawing compulsion by amantadine. Experientia 29:1524–1525

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen PA, Niemegeers CJE, Jageneau AHM (1960) Apomorphine antagonism in rats. Arzneimittelforschung 10:1003–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg T, Ungerstedt U (1977) Apomorphine-induced locomotion and gnawing: Evidence that the experimental design greatly influences gnawing while locomotion remains unchanged. Eur J Pharmacol 46:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogilnicka E, Braestrup C (1976) Noradrenergic influence on the stereotyped behaviour induced by amphetamine, phenethylamine and apomorphine. J Pharm Pharmacol 28:253–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey SC, Dubey MP, Dhawan BN (1986) Ontogenic studies on brain biogenic amines in Mastomys natalensis. Ind J Med Res 84:405–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Randrup A, Munkvad I (1967) Stereotyped activities produced by amphetamine in several animal species and man. Psychopharmacology 11:300–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Randrup A, Munkvad I (1974) The pharmacology and physiology of stereotyped behaviour. J Psychiat Res 11:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheel-Krüger J (1970) Central effects of anticholinergic drugs measured by apomorphine gnawing test in mice. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 28:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla R, Srimal RC, Dhawan BN (1985) Centrally mediated effects of GBR 12909, a dopamine reuptake inhibitor on body temperature of pigeon, rabbit and Mastomys natalensis. Ind J Pharmacol 17:P077

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla R, Srimal RC, Dhawan BN (1981) The effect of intracerebroventricular administration of catecholamines and their antagonists on rectal temperature in Mastomys natalensis. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 318:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RC, Leelavathi DE, Lauritzen MA (1978) Behavioural effects of dopamine agonist increase with age. Commun Psychopharmacol 2:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Srimal RC, Dhawan BN (1970) An analysis of methylphenidate induced gnawing in guinea pig. Psychopharmacology 18: 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beck MC, Timmerman H (1974) Some benzhydryl derivatives as central dopamine receptor stimulating agents. J Pharm Pharmacol 26: 57–58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Send offprint requests to A. Gulati

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gulati, A., Srima, R.C. & Dhawan, B.N. An analysis of stereotyped behaviour in Mastomys natalensis. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 337, 572–575 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182734

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182734

Key words

Navigation