Skip to main content
Log in

Competition for a mate restricts mate search of female pied flycatchers

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We studied the mate sampling behaviour of female pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, in a 40-ha area containing 10–12 unmated males whose nestboxes were monitored with videocameras. The main results were: (1) The females undertook a restricted mate search. The females that mated in the area during three monitoring periods (n = 20, 12 females released by us and 8 females that arrived naturally) sampled 1–10 males (median 4.5). This was about 40% of the available mating options. (2) Search costs in terms of time and energy were low. The search period was short (median 5.1 h) and only a small proportion of the search period was spent at the nestboxes of males (median 4%). The females visited up to seven different males in 1 h, and the time elapsing between visits to different males was short (median 13 min). The minimum distance travelled during the search was also short (median 1.4 km). (3) There was competition between the females. We recorded seven cases of two females visiting the same male at the same time, including at least one case involving physical fighting. (4) Females that experienced a high level of competition had a more restricted mate search than females that experienced a low level of competition. (5) The search pattern of most of the females did not conform to the best-of-n-males rule nor to the threshold criterion rule, because they made repeated visits to many of the males sampled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (1984) Polyterritorial polygyny in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca — evidence for the deception hypothesis. Ann Zool Fennici 21:217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (1990) Polyterritorial polygyny in the pied flycatcher. Adv Study Behav 19:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Alatalo RV, Carlson A, Lundberg A (1988) The search cost in mate choice of the pied flycatcher. Anim Behav 36:289–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Glynn C (1986) Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323:152–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Arak A (1988) Female mate selection in the natterjack toad: active choice or passive attraction? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:317–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia G, Pruett-Jones SG, Pruett-Jones MA (1985) The evolution of bower-building and the assessment of male quality. Z Tierpsychol 67:225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L, Downhower JF (1983) Constraints on female choice in the mottled sculpin. In: Wasser SK (ed) Social behaviour of female vertebrates. Academic Press, London, pp 39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale S, Slagsvold T (1990) Random settlement of female pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca: significance of male territory size. Anim Behav 39:231–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale S, Amundsen T, Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1990) Mate sampling behaviour of female pied flycatchers: evidence for active mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly M (1978) The cost of mating. Am Nat 112:771–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1978) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Bradbury JW (1986) Male and female mating strategies on sage grouse leks. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social evolution. Bird and mammals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 379–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronell AM (1989) Visiting behaviour by females of the sexually dichromatic damselfish, Chrysiptera cyanea (Teleostei: Pomacentridae): a probable method of assessing male quality. Ethology 81:89–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1982) Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): do residents always win? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruijt JP, Hogan JA (1967) Social behaviour on the lek in black grouse, Lyrurus tetrix tetrix (L.). Ardea 55:203–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1986) The function of courtship feeding during incubation in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 34:1441–1453

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightbody JP, Weatherhead PJ (1987) Polygyny in the yellow-headed blackbird: female choice versus male competition. Anim Behav 35:1670–1684

    Google Scholar 

  • Lill A (1974) Sexual behaviour of the lek-forming white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus trinitatis Hartert). Z Tierpsychol 36:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lill A (1976) Lek behaviour in the golden-headed manakin Pipra erythrocephala, in Trinidad (West Indies). Z Tierpsychol Beih 18:1–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore AJ (1989) The behavioural ecology of Libellula luctuosa (Burmeister) (Odonata: Libellulidae): III. Male density, OSR, and male and female mating behaviour. Behaviour 80:120–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore AJ, Moore PJ (1988) Female strategy during mate choice: threshold assessment. Evolution 42:387–391

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald P (1980) Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB, Payne K (1977) Social organization and mating success in local song populations of village indigobirds, Vidula chalybeata. Z Tierpsychol 45:113–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Halliday T, Sanders C (1991) Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim Behav 41:323–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski A (1987) The costs of choice in sexual selection. J Theor Biol 128:195–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruett-Jones SG, Pruett-Jones MA (1990) Sexual selection through female choice in Lawes' parotia, a lek-mating bird of paradise. Evolution 44:486–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Real L (1990) Search theory and mate choice. 1. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am Nat 136:376–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JD, Gross MR (1990) Costs and benefits of female mate choice: is there a lek paradox? Am Nat 136:230–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T (1986) Nest site settlement by the pied flycatcher: does the female choose her mate for the quality of his house or himself? Ornis Scand 17:210–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Dale S (1991) Male choice models: can cost of searching and cost of courtship explain mating patterns of female pied flycatchers? Ornis Scand 22:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT (1990) Return rates of male pied flycatchers: an experimental study manipulating breeding success. In: Blondel J, Gosler A, Lebreton JD, McCleery R (eds) Population biology of passerine birds. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 441–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T, Lifjeld JT, Stenmark G, Breiehagen T (1988) On the cost of searching for a mate in female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 36:433–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg H (1989) Pied flycatcher. In: Newton I (ed) Lifetime reproduction in birds. Academic Press, London, pp 55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Trail PW (1985) Courtship disruption modifies mate choice in a lek-breeding bird. Science 227:778–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Trail PW (1990) Why should lek-breeders be monomorphic? Evolution 44:1837–1852

    Google Scholar 

  • Trail PW, Adams ES (1989) Active mate choice at cock-of-the-rock leks: tactics of sampling and comparison. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:283–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ, Pruett-Jones SG (1990) Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:5749–5753

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing SR (1988) Cost of mating for female insects: risk of predation in Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Am Nat 131:139–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger JF (1983) Tactics of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 435–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton JT, Bollinger EK, Hibbard CJ (1986) Mating systems in homogeneous habitats: the effect of female uncertainty, knowledge costs, and random settlement. Am Nat 128:499–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M, Johnson K, Thornhill R, Ligon JD (1990) Mechanisms of female choice in red jungle fowl. Evolution 44:477–485

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dale, S., Rinden, H. & Slagsvold, T. Competition for a mate restricts mate search of female pied flycatchers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30, 165–176 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166699

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166699

Keywords

Navigation