Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Graded recruitment in a ponerine ant

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

(1) The giant tropical ant, Paraponera clavata, exhibits graded recruitment responses, depending on the type, quantity, and quality of a food source. More ants are initially recruited to a large prey or scavenge item than to a large quantity of sugar water. (2) Individual ants encountering prey items gauge the size and/or unwieldiness of the item, regardless of the weight, when determining whether to recruit. (3) The trail pheromone of this species is often used as an orientation device by individual ants, independent of recruitment of nestmates. (4) It is proposed that the foraging behavior of P. clavata represents one of the evolutionary transitions from the independent foraging activities of the primitive ants to the highly coordinated cooperative foraging activities of many “higher” ants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attygale AB, Morgan ED (1985) Ant trail pheromones. Adv Ins Physiol 18:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed MD, Bennett B (1985) Mass recruitment to nectar sources in Paraponera clavata: A field study. Insectes Soc 32:198–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadab R, Rettenmeyer CW (1975) Mass recruitment by army ants. Science 188:1124–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford DL, Rissing SW (1983) Regulation of recruitment by individual scouts in Formica oreas Insectes Soc 30:177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Hangartner W (1969) Structure and variability of the individual odor trail in Solenopsis geminata. Z Vergl Physiol 62:111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins CP, Haskins EF (1950) Notes on the biology and social behavior of the archaic ponerine ants of the genera Myrmecia and Promyrmecia. Ann Entomol Soc Am 43:461–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1971) Recruitment behavior in Camponotus socius. Z Vergl Physiol 75:123–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1974) Communication by tandem running in the ant Camponotus sericeus. J Comp Physiol 90:105–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1976) Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:3–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1978) Ethological aspects of chemical communication in ants. Adv Study Behav 8:75–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1984) The evolution of insect communication. In: Lewis T (ed) Insect communication, Academic Press, New York, pp 349–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Stanton R, Markl H (1978) Recruitment and food-retrieving behavior in Novomessor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:163–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1970) Recruitment trails in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex badius. Psyche 77:385–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH, Carroll CR (1983) Paraponera clavata. In: Janzen DH (ed) Costa Rican Natural History. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 752–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe K, Howse PE (1978) The mass recruitment system of the leaf cutting ant, Atta cephalotes. Anim Behav 27:930–939

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessen K, Maschwitz U (1985) Individual specific trails in the ant Pachycondyla tesserinoda. Naturwissenschaften 72:549–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Markl H, Hölldobler B (1978) Recruitment and food-retrieving behavior in Novomessor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:183–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (1974) The comparative social behavior of the bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Möglich M, Hölldobler B (1975) Communication and orientation during foraging and emigration in the ant, Formica fusca. J Comp Physiol 101:275–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster G, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor FJ (1978) Foraging behavior of ants: theoretical considerations. J Theor Biol 71:541–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA (1977) Recruitment behavior, orientation, and the organization of foraging in the Carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1962) Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant, Solenopsis saevissima. Anim Behav 10:134–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Young AM, Hermann HR (1980) Notes on the foraging of the giant tropical ant, Paraponera clavata J Kansas Entomol Soc 53:32–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental, Population, and Organismic Biology, University of Colorado, 80309-0334, Boulder, CO, USA

    Michael D. Breed, Jennifer H. Fewell, Allen J. Moore & Kristina R. Williams

Authors
  1. Michael D. Breed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer H. Fewell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Allen J. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kristina R. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breed, M.D., Fewell, J.H., Moore, A.J. et al. Graded recruitment in a ponerine ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20, 407–411 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302983

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302983

Keywords

Search

Navigation