Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variation in a semi-natural Drosophila population after a bottleneck I. Lethals, their allelism and effective population size

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A semi-natural Drosophila melanogaster population was twice forced through a genetic bottleneck and allowed to recover naturally. In one case additional variation was introduced to the recovering population. The percentage of lethal chromosomes, the level of allelism between these lethals, and the effective population size calculated from the allelism of these lethals all rose sharply in the few generations following each bottleneck, though this was not the case in the very first generation. Thereafter this rise decelerated rapidly and never returned to pre-bottleneck levels. Additional introduced variation had little effect. The reasons for and implications of this pattern have been considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, W. W., 1969. Genetics of natural populations. XLI. The selection coefficients of heterozygotes for lethal chromosomes in Drosophila on different genetic backgrounds. Genetics 62: 827–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon, M., 1977. The effective size of a natural Drosophila subobscura population. Heredity 38: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon, M., Chadburn, R. & Bishop, J. A., 1984a. The effects of different levels of genetic variation on the population ecology of a semi-natural Drosophila population. In preparation.

  • Begon, M., Chadburn, R., Bishop, J. A. & Keill, C., 1984b. Genetic structure of a semi-natural Drosophila melanogaster population after a bottleneck: the relative fitnesses of second chromosomes. Genetica (in press).

  • Begon, M., Krimbas, C. B. & Loukas, M., 1980. The genetics of Drosophila subobscura populations. XV. Effective size of a natural population estimated by three independent methods. Heredity 45: 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, F. N. & Johnson, N. L., 1952. The truncated Poisson. Biometrics 8: 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., 1946. Genetics of natural populations. XIII. Recombination and variability in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 31: 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., Levene, H., Spassky, B. & Spassky, N., 1959. Release of genetic variability through recombination. III. Drosophila prosaltans. Genetics 44: 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. & Spassky, B., 1968. Genetics of natural populations. XL. Heterotic and deleterious effects of recessive lethals in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 59: 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. & Wright, S., 1941. Genetics of natural populations. V. Relations between mutation rate and accumulation of lethals in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 26: 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. J. D., 1974. Effective population numbers in the snail Cepaea nemoralis. Evolution 28: 513–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlik, A. & Feuerbach-Mravlag, H., 1977. The genetic conditions in heterozygous and homozygous populations of Drosophila. III. EMS induced lethal mutations in homo- and heterozygous populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 47: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukas, M., Krimbas, C. B. & Sourdis, J., 1980. The genetics of Drosophila subobscura populations. XIII. A study of lethal allelism. Genetica 54: 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T., 1954. Genetic drift in irradiated experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 39: 529–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spassky, B., Spassky, N., Levene, H. & Dobzhansky, Th., 1958. Release of genetic variability through recombination. I. Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 43: 844–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperlich, D. & Karlik, A., 1970. The genetic conditions in heterozygous and homozygous populations of Drosophila. I. The fate of alien chromosomes. Genetica 41: 265–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperlich, D. & Karlik, A., 1972. The genetic conditions in heterozygous and homozygous populations of Drosophila. II. X-ray induced lethals in a homozygous and a heterozygous population. Genetica 43: 443–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., 1959. Release of genetic variability through recombination. II. Drosophila persimilis. Genetics 44: 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B. & Allen, A. C., 1961. Release of genetic variability through recombination. VII. Second and third chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 46: 1531–1553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sved, J. A. & Ayala, F. J., 1970. A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 66: 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B., 1951. Genetic changes within populations after X-irradiation. Genetics 36: 612–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B., 1956. Studies on irradiated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genetics 54: 280–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., 1938. Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science 87: 430–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., Dobzhansky, Th. & Hovanitz, W., 1942. Genetics of natural populations. VII. The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Begon, M., Chadburn, R., Bishop, J.A. et al. Genetic variation in a semi-natural Drosophila population after a bottleneck I. Lethals, their allelism and effective population size. Genetica 66, 11–20 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123601

Keywords

Navigation